Spatial Modeling of Daily PM2.5, NO2, and CO Concentrations Measured by a Low-Cost Sensor Network: Comparison of Linear, Machine Learning, and Hybrid Land Use Models

Author(s):  
Sakshi Jain ◽  
Albert A. Presto ◽  
Naomi Zimmerman
2021 ◽  
pp. 111352
Author(s):  
Eric S. Coker ◽  
A. Kofi Amegah ◽  
Ernest Mwebaze ◽  
Joel Ssematimba ◽  
Engineer Bainomugisha

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-328
Author(s):  
Naomi Zimmerman ◽  
Hugh Z. Li ◽  
Aja Ellis ◽  
Aliaksei Hauryliuk ◽  
Ellis S. Robinson ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 5175
Author(s):  
Hadi Alasti

A low-cost machine learning (ML) algorithm is proposed and discussed for spatial tracking of unknown, correlated signals in localized, ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. Each sensor is modeled as one neuron and a selected subset of these neurons are called to identify the spatial signal. The algorithm is implemented in two phases of spatial modeling and spatial tracking. The spatial signal is modeled using its M iso-contour lines at levels {ℓj}j=1M and those sensors that their sensor observations are in Δ margin of any of these levels report their sensor observations to the fusion center (FC) for spatial signal reconstruction. In spatial modeling phase, the number of these contour lines, their levels and a proper Δ are identified. In this phase, the algorithm may either use adaptive-weight stochastic gradient or scaled stochastic gradient method to select a proper Δ. Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with zero mean is assumed along with the sensor observations. To reduce the observation noise’s effect, each sensor applies moving average filter on its observation to drastically reduce the effect of noise. The modeling performance, the cost and the convergence of the algorithm are discussed based on extensive computer simulations and reasoning. The algorithm is proposed for climate and environmental monitoring. In this paper, the percentage of wireless sensors that initiate a communication attempt is assumed as cost. The performance evaluation results show that the proposed spatial tracking approach is low-cost and can model the spatial signal over time with the same performance as that of spatial modeling.


Author(s):  
Hadi Alasti

A low-cost machine learning (ML) algorithm is proposed and discussed for spatial tracking of unknown, correlated signals in localized, ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. Each sensor is modeled as one neuron and a selected subset of these neurons are called to identify the spatial signal. The algorithm is implemented in two phases of spatial modeling and spatial tracking. The spatial signal is modeled using its M iso-contour lines at levels {ℓj}j=1M and those sensors that their sensor observations are in Δ margin of any of these levels report their sensor observations to the fusion center (FC) for spatial signal reconstruction. In spatial modeling phase, the number of these contour lines, their levels and a proper Δ are identified. In this phase, the algorithm may either use adaptive-weight stochastic gradient or scaled stochastic gradient method to select a proper Δ. Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with zero mean is assumed along with the sensor observations. To reduce the observation noise’s effect, each sensor applies moving average filter on its observation to drastically reduce the effect of noise. The modeling performance, the cost and the convergence of the algorithm are discussed based on extensive computer simulations and reasoning. The algorithm is proposed for environmental monitoring. In this paper, the percentage of the communication attempts of wireless sensors is assumed as cost. Performance evaluation results show that the proposed spatial tracking approach is low cost and can model the spatial signal over time with the same performance as that of spatial modeling.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiannan Duan ◽  
Jianchao Lee ◽  
Jinhong Gao ◽  
Jiayuan Chen ◽  
Yachao Lian ◽  
...  

<p>Machine learning (ML) has brought significant technological innovations in many fields, but it has not been widely embraced by most researchers of natural sciences to date. Traditional understanding and promotion of chemical analysis cannot meet the definition and requirement of big data for running of ML. Over the years, we focused on building a more versatile and low-cost approach to the acquisition of copious amounts of data containing in a chemical reaction. The generated data meet exclusively the thirst of ML when swimming in the vast space of chemical effect. As proof in this study, we carried out a case for acute toxicity test throughout the whole routine, from model building, chip preparation, data collection, and ML training. Such a strategy will probably play an important role in connecting ML with much research in natural science in the future.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 1239-1254
Author(s):  
Hong Anh Thi Nguyen ◽  
Tip Sophea ◽  
Shabbir H. Gheewala ◽  
Rawee Rattanakom ◽  
Thanita Areerob ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 107608
Author(s):  
Ziguan Wang ◽  
Guangcai Wang ◽  
Tingyu Ren ◽  
Haibo Wang ◽  
Qingyu Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document