scholarly journals Interfacial Roughness Facilitated by Dislocation and a Metal-Fuse Resistor Fabricated Using a Nanomanipulator

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 24442-24449
Author(s):  
Junwei Zhang ◽  
Rongrong Chen ◽  
Xian Li ◽  
Yong Peng ◽  
Hongbin Ma ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 368-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randolph Q. Hood ◽  
L. M. Falicov ◽  
D. R. Penn

2000 ◽  
Vol 62 (16) ◽  
pp. 11071-11075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Di Stefano ◽  
Salvatore Savasta ◽  
Giovanna Martino ◽  
Raffaello Girlanda

2006 ◽  
Vol 83 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 2253-2257 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ehouarne ◽  
M. Putero ◽  
D. Mangelinck ◽  
F. Nemouchi ◽  
T. Bigault ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 32-33 ◽  
pp. 615-618
Author(s):  
A. Ourmazd ◽  
P. Schwander ◽  
Christian Kisielowski-Kemmerich ◽  
Michael Seibt ◽  
F.H. Baumann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Ma ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Shijie Jin ◽  
Mingkai Lei

Aiming at characterizing interfacial roughness of thin coatings with unknown sound velocity and thickness, we derive a full time-domain ultrasonic reflection coefficient phase spectrum (URCPS) as a function of interfacial roughness based on the phase screen approximation theory. The constructed URCPS is used to determine the velocity, thickness, and interfacial roughness of specimens through the cross-correlation algorithm. The effect of detection frequency on the roughness measurement is investigated through the finite element method. A series of simulations were implemented on Ni-coating specimens with a thickness of 400 μm and interfacial roughness of 1.9–39.8 μm. Simulation results indicated that the measurement errors of interfacial roughness were less than 10% when the roughness satisfies the relationship of Rq = 1.6–10.0%λ. The measured velocity and thicknesses were in good agreement with those imported in simulation models with less than 9.3% error. Ultrasonic experiments were carried out on two Ni-coating specimens through a flat transducer with an optimized frequency of 15 MHz. Compared with the velocities measured by time-of-flight (TOF) method, the relative errors of inversed velocities were all less than 10%. The inversed thicknesses were in good agreement with those observed by optical microscopy with less than 10.9% and 7.6% error. The averaged interfacial roughness determined by the ultrasonic inversion method was 16.9 μm and 30.7 μm, respectively. The relative errors were 5.1% and 2.0% between ultrasonic and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) method, respectively.


1989 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 2587-2595 ◽  
Author(s):  
R C Ball ◽  
M Blunt ◽  
W Barford

2000 ◽  
Vol 87 (10) ◽  
pp. 7255-7260 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ulyanenkov ◽  
R. Matsuo ◽  
K. Omote ◽  
K. Inaba ◽  
J. Harada ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document