Structural Basis for Phosphomannose Isomerase Activity in Phosphoglucose Isomerase fromPyrobaculum aerophilum:  A Subtle Difference between Distantly Related Enzymes†

Biochemistry ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (44) ◽  
pp. 14088-14095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Swan ◽  
Thomas Hansen ◽  
Peter Schönheit ◽  
Christopher Davies
2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J. Baker

The determination and comparison of the structures of a number of glutamate dehydrogenases that span the spectrum of thermal stability from mesophiles to hyperthermophiles have revealed that the formation of extended ion-pair networks is a major stabilizing feature in the adaptation of the organism to life at 100°C. Analysis of the structures of other hyperthermophilic proteins has shown that ion-pair networks also play roles in their stabilization, including the phosphoglucose isomerase from Pyrococcus furiosus and the maltosyltransferase from Thermotoga maritima.


2000 ◽  
Vol 350 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raman P. NAGARAJAN ◽  
Yan CHEN

Smad2 and Smad3 are signalling proteins that are involved in mediating the transcriptional regulation of target genes downstream of transforming growth factor-β and activin receptors. Although they are structurally very similar, Smad2 and Smad3 have some functional differences in transducing signals for these receptors. In FAST-2 (forkhead activin signal transducer-2)-mediated transcriptional regulation using the activin-responsive element derived from Xenopus Mix.2 promoter as a reporter, Smad3 but not Smad2 alone was able to stimulate the transcription. In addition, Smad3 was able to inhibit the transactivation of the promoter induced by co-expression of Smad2, Smad4 and an active activin type-I receptor. We used a series of chimaeras between Smad1 and Smad3 and found that the Mad homology 1 (MH1) domain of Smad3 was indispensable for the dual regulatory function of Smad3. However, this Smad3-specific function could not be manifested in Smad2 mutants that were devoid of the two amino acid insertions (at the MH1 domain) that comprise the major structural difference between Smad2 and Smad3, indicating that other structural motifs are involved in determining the regulatory activity of Smad3. By using chimaeras between Smad2 and Smad3, we found that the most N-terminal portion of Smad3 was crucial for its function. Taken together, these results suggest that, as compared with Smad2, the unique function of Smad3 in modulating the FAST-2-mediated transcription is contributed to by a subtle difference in the structural features at the MH1 domain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document