Control of Membrane Biofouling in MBR for Wastewater Treatment by Quorum Quenching Bacteria Encapsulated in Microporous Membrane

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 4877-4884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Suk Oh ◽  
Kyung-Min Yeon ◽  
Cheon-Seok Yang ◽  
Sang-Ryoung Kim ◽  
Chung-Hak Lee ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 04026
Author(s):  
Xinmeng Jiao ◽  
Kang Xie ◽  
Liping Qiu

Membrane bioreactor (MBR) is a kind of reputable and prospective technology for wastewater treatment and reformation applications. However, membrane fouling caused by the formation of biofilm on the membrane surface, especially biofouling, is a major obstacle that limits the energy-saving operation and maintenance of the membrane bioreactor (MBR). Microbial communication (known as Quorum Sensing (QS)) is the cause of this fouling phenomenon. A new strategy called Quorum Quenching (QQ) seems to have been successfully used for biological pollution control in wastewater treatment MBR. This review summarizes the latest findings regarding membrane fouling, QS mechanisms and QQ applications. We discussed the opportunities for further practical application of self-cleaning engineering QQ bacteria in MBR.


2014 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 472-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang-Ning Song ◽  
Yuan-Yuan Cheng ◽  
Wen-Wei Li ◽  
Bing-Bing Li ◽  
Guo-Ping Sheng ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (20) ◽  
pp. 10914-10922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kibaek Lee ◽  
Seonki Lee ◽  
Sang Hyun Lee ◽  
Sang-Ryoung Kim ◽  
Hyun-Suk Oh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giantommaso Scarascia ◽  
Luca Fortunato ◽  
Yevhen Myshkevych ◽  
Hong Cheng ◽  
TorOve Leiknes ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAnaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for wastewater treatment has attracted much interest due to its efficacy in providing high quality effluent with minimal energy costs. However, membrane biofouling represents the main bottleneck for AnMBR because it diminishes flux and necessitates frequent replacement of membranes. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of combining bacteriophages and UV-C irradiation to provide a chemical-free approach to remove biofoulants on the membrane. The combination of bacteriophage and UV-C resulted in better log cells removal and twice higher extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) concentration reduction in mature biofoulants compared to UV-C. A reduction in the relative abundance of Acinetobacter spp. and selected gram-positive bacteria associated with the membrane biofilm was also achieved by the new cleaning approach. Microscopic analysis further revealed the formation of cavities in the biofilm due to bacteriophages and UV-C irradiation, which would be beneficial to maintain water flux through the membrane. When the combined treatment was further compared with the common chemical cleaning procedure, a similar reduction on the cell numbers was observed (1.4 log). However, combined treatment was less effective in removing EPS compared with chemical cleaning. These results suggest that the combination of UV-C and bacteriophage have an additive effect in biofouling reduction, representing a potential chemical-free method to remove reversible biofoulants on membrane fitted in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor.SIGNIFICANCEAnaerobic membrane bioreactors can achieve high quality effluent with a reduced energy consumption. However, biofouling represents the main bottleneck for membrane filtration efficiency. Biofouling is commonly reduced through chemical treatment. These agents are often detrimental for the environment and health safety due to the formation of toxic byproducts. Therefore, we present a new approach, based on the additive antifouling action of bacteriophages infection and UV-C irradiation, to reduce anaerobic membrane biofouling. This new strategy could potentially delay the occurrence of membrane fouling by removing the reversible fouling layers on membranes, in turn reducing the frequencies and amount of chemicals needed throughout the course of wastewater treatment.


Biofouling ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 912-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kibaek Lee ◽  
Jun-Seong Park ◽  
Tahir Iqbal ◽  
Chang Hyun Nahm ◽  
Pyung-Kyu Park ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1746-1754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seonki Lee ◽  
Sang Hyun Lee ◽  
Kibaek Lee ◽  
Hyeokpil Kwon ◽  
Chang Hyun Nahm ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document