Modern Pharmaceutics, 3rd Edition Edited by Gilbert S. Banker (University of Iowa) and Christopher T. Rhodes (University of Rhode Island). Marcel Dekker, New York, NY. 1996. ix + 943 pp. 17.5 × 25 cm. $195.00. ISBN 0-8247-9371-4.

1996 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 642-642
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
University Of Iowa

Use of the AMA Guides in State Workers' Compensation Systems: 2009 Update

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Jenny Walker
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
South Dakota ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Specific Guideline ◽  
Compensation Systems

Abstract The AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) is the most widely used basis for determining impairment and is used in state workers’ compensation systems, federal systems, automobile casualty, and personal injury, as well as by the majority of state workers’ compensation jurisdictions. Two tables summarize the edition of the AMA Guides used and provide information by state. The fifth edition (2000) is the most commonly used edition: California, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Vermont, and Washington. Eleven states use the sixth edition (2007): Alaska, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wyoming. Eight states still commonly make use of the fourth edition (1993): Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, South Dakota, Texas, and West Virginia. Two states use the Third Edition, Revised (1990): Colorado and Oregon. Connecticut does not stipulate which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Six states use their own state specific guidelines (Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, and Wisconsin), and six states do not specify a specific guideline (Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Virginia). Statutes may or may not specify which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Some states use their own guidelines for specific problems and use the Guides for other issues.

scholarly journals Babesiosis Occurrence among the U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Ages 65 and Older, During 2006-2017: Overall, and by State and County of Residence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Menis ◽  
Barbee I Whitaker ◽  
Michael Wernecke ◽  
Yixin Jiao ◽  
Anne Eder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Parasitic Infection ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
At Risk Populations ◽  
Human Babesiosis ◽  
The U.S

Abstract Background Human babesiosis is a mild-to-severe parasitic infection that poses health concerns especially in older and other at-risk populations. The study objective was to assess babesiosis occurrence among the U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, ages 65 and older, during 2006-2017. Methods Our retrospective claims-based study utilized Medicare databases. Babesiosis cases were identified using recorded diagnosis codes. The study estimated rates (per 100,000 beneficiary-years) overall, by year, diagnosis month, demographics, state and county of residence. Results Nationwide, 19,469 beneficiaries had babesiosis recorded, a rate of 6 per 100,000 person-years, ranging from 4 in 2006 to 9 in 2017 (p<0.05). The highest babesiosis rates were in: Massachusetts (62), Rhode Island (61), Connecticut (51), New York (30), and New Jersey (19). The highest rates by county were in: Nantucket, MA (1,089); Dukes, MA (236); Barnstable, MA (213); and Dutchess, NY (205). Increasing rates, from 2006 through 2017 (p<0.05), were identified in multiple states, including states previously considered non-endemic. New Hampshire, Maine, Vermont, Pennsylvania, and Delaware saw rates increase by several times. Conclusion Our 12-year study shows substantially increasing babesiosis diagnosis trends, with highest rates in well-established endemic states. It also suggests expansion of babesiosis infections in other states and highlights the utility of real-world evidence.

scholarly journals The Events of June 1848: the ‘Monte Cristo’ Riots and the Politics of Protest

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Emeljanow
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Anton Chekhov ◽  
University Of Iowa ◽  
The Real ◽  
Social Concerns ◽  
Critical Heritage ◽  
Cultural Tensions ◽  
The University

Theatrical riots are usually dismissed as occasions during which aesthetic reactionaries battled reformers over stylistic issues of little relevance to pressing and immediate social concerns. Yet how true is this? What were the real issues which boiled over at such apparently confined and innocuous occasions as the Old Price Riots at Covent Garden in 1809, the Paris Ernani riot of 1830, the visit of a celebrated English actor which sparked the New York Astor Place riot in 1849, or the first night of a play which brought about the Playboy riots in Dublin in 1907? The complex social and cultural tensions on such occasions clearly operated during the two days of disturbance which came to be known as the Monte Cristo riots in London in 1848, and there are curious modern parallels. Victor Emeljanow is Professor of Drama at the University of Newcastle, Australia. His full length works include Anton Chekhov: the Critical Heritage, Victorian Popular Dramatists, and, with Jim Davis, Reflecting the Audience: London Theatregoing, 1840–1880 (University of Iowa Press, 2001), which was recently awarded the Society for Theatre Research's Book Prize for 2002.

Diaspidiotus ostreaeformis. [Distribution map].

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Fruit Trees ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Central Russia ◽  
Southern Russia ◽  
Northern Russia

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Diaspidiotus ostreaeformis[Diaspidiotus ostreaeformis] (Curtis) Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Diaspididae Polyphagous on deciduous trees including fruit trees such as Malus, Prunus and Pyrus spp. Information is given on the geographical distribution in EUROPE, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia (former), Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Central Russia, Russian Far East, Northern Russia, Siberia, Southern Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, Ukraine, Yugoslavia (former), ASIA, Armenia, China, Anhui, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, NeiMenggu, Shaanxi, Shanxi, Xinjiang, Republic of Georgia, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Japan, Hokkaido, Kazakhstan, Korea Dem People's Republic, Korea Republic, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Uzbekistan, AFRICA, Algeria, Egypt, NORTH AMERICA, Canada, British Columbia, Ontario, USA, Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina, OCEANIA, Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, New Zealand.

Fomes fomentarius. [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Minter
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Conservation Status ◽  
Uttar Pradesh ◽  
Voronezh Oblast ◽  
Moscow Oblast ◽  
Novosibirsk Oblast ◽  
Novgorod Oblast ◽  
Fomes Fomentarius

Abstract A description is provided for Fomes fomentarius. Sporophores of this fungus are found on both living and dead trees, where the fungus causes a decay of heartwood. Some information on its associated organisms and substrata, dispersal and transmission, habitats and conservation status is given, along with details of its geographical distribution (Africa (São Tomé and Principe, Somalia, Tunisia), Asia (Azerbaijan, China (Hong Kong), Cyprus, Georgia, India (Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Karnataka, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal), Iran, Japan, Kazakhstan (Akmola, Aktobe, Almaty, East Kazakhstan, Kostanay, North Kazakhstan, Pavlodar, South Kazakhstan, West Kazakhstan), Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia (Altai Krai, Altai Republic, Buryatia, Chelyabinsk Oblast, Irkutsk Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai, Novosibirsk Oblast, Primorsky Krai, Sakha Republic, Sakhalin Oblast, Tyumen Oblast, Zabaykalsky Krai), South Korea, Tajikistan, Turkey, Uzbekistan), Central America (Panama), Atlantic Ocean (Portugal (Madeira)), Europe (Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Latvia, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia (Komi Republic, Krasnodar Krai, Moscow Oblast, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, Orenburg Oblast, Republic of Karelia, Saratov Oblast, Voronezh Oblast), Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, UK), North America (Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan), USA (Alabama, Alaska, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin)), South America (Brazil (Minas Gerais, Santa Catarina), Chile)).

Phragmidium mucronatum. [Distribution map].

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Dakota ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Prince Edward Island ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Rio Grande Do Sul ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
New Distribution ◽  
Distribution In Europe

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Phragmidium mucronatum (Pers) Schltdl. Basidiomycota: Uredinales. Hosts: Rosa species. Information is given on the geographical distribution in Europe (Austria, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, and England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland), Asia (Armenia; Anhui, Gansu, Hebei, Hunan, Jiangsu, Shaanxi, Shandong, Sichuan, Xinjiang, Xizhang and Yunnan, China; Republic of Georgia; Iran; Iraq; Hokkaido, Japan; Kazakhstan; Myanmar; Pakistan; Saudi Arabia; and Turkey), Africa (Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Libya, Madagascar, Morocco, South Africa and Zimbabwe), North America (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island and Quebec, Canada; Mexico; and Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin, USA), Central America and Caribbean (Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras and Jamaica), South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, and Espirito Santo, Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and São Paulo, Brazil), and Oceania (New Zealand, and Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia, Australia).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document