Association between immunity and prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer patients before adjuvant treatment

e12065 Background: Adjuvant hormone therapy is a crucial part of the treatment for patients with early stage breast cancer and an important quality measure for programs such as QOPI and the oncology care model (OCM). However, it is not known which factors influence some patients with early stage breast cancer to decline adjuvant hormone therapy. We hypothesized that specific self-reported symptoms might impact a patient’s decision to accept or decline adjuvant hormone therapy. Methods: Patients with stage 0 or I breast cancer were identified by chart review from 2011-2016 and de-identified. On the day patients received a recommendation for adjuvant treatment the following patient reported outcome measures (PROs) were analyzed: difficulty sleeping (DS), fatigue (F), mood (M such as anxiety and depression), and pain (P) on a 0-4 symptom scale based on CTCAE v. 4. PROs were then linked with a patient’s decision to accept or decline adjuvant therapy. Results: A total of 287 patients with stage 0 (n = 80) or stage I (n = 207) breast cancer were identified. 38 stage O and 103 stage I patients had evaluable PROs on the same day a recommendation for adjuvant hormone therapy was made. Overall 18/38 (47.4%) of stage 0 patients and 90 of 103 (87.4%) of stage I patients accepted adjuvant treatment. Stage 0 patients declining adjuvant therapy reported any grade of PROs: DS (40%, n = 8), F (35%, n = 7), M (35%, n = 7), P (20%, n = 4). Stage 0 patients accepting treatment reported: DS (22%, n = 4), F (44%, n = 8), M (6%, n = 1), P (20%, n = 4). Stage I patients who declined treatment reported: DS (54%, n = 7), F (46%, n = 6), M (38%, n = 5), P (62%, n = 8). Stage I patients accepting treatment reported: DS (41%, n = 37), F (49%, n = 44), M (31%, n = 28), P (36%, n = 32). Conclusions: Early stage breast cancer patients declining adjuvant hormone therapy are more likely to self report symptoms such as difficulty sleeping, mood disturbances (anxiety, depression), and pain than those accepting treatment.

Download Full-text

Explanation model using pathological data for treatment outcome of patients with early-stage breast cancer with hormonal receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e12006 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e12006-e12006

Author(s):

Naiyarat Prasongsook

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Adjuvant Treatment ◽

Hormonal Therapy ◽

Tumor Size ◽

Early Stage ◽

Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Ki 67

e12006 Background: The decision to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer patients with HR+ and HER2- is still unclear. Although the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is a validated testing and becomes an emerging decision-making tool; it is still controversial guidance on adding adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with intermediate RS. This study aimed to develop the explanation model by using pathological information for prediction of the best outcome from adjuvant systemic treatment in these patients.Methods: Early-stage breast cancer patients with HR+, and HER2- who underwent complete resection registered within electronic medical record from 2003 to 2013 were included. Patient’s characteristics and pathological information were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted by using stepwise logistic regression. The explanation model was explored by using association between multivariate models and overall survival (OS).Results: 236 patients who underwent complete surgery treatment were included. 121 patients (51%) were treated with sequential adjuvant treatment, and 115 patients (48%) with anti-hormonal therapy alone. Clinicopathological parameters between two groups were demonstrated in Table1. Tumor size (≥2 – 5 cm), Estrogen receptor-negative/ Progesterone receptor-positive (ER-/PgR+), and Ki-67 expression were statistically significant multivariate independent prognostic factors for OS. When we adjusted for tumor size, HR status, and Ki-67 expression, the explanation model predicted 10-year OS was 99.2% for patients with sequential adjuvant treatment, whereas 89.5% for patients with adjuvant anti-hormonal alone (difference: 9.7%); p-value = 0.01.Conclusions: We found substantial discordance in 10-year OS benefit between early-breast cancer patients with HR+, HER2- with sequential adjuvant therapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy alone. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in early-breast cancer patients with 2-3 cm in tumor size, ER-/PgR+, and Ki 67 expression.

Download Full-text