Long-term trends in interplanetary magnetic field strength and solar wind structure during the twentieth century

2002 ◽  
Vol 107 (A10) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Field Strength ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Field Strength ◽  
Wind Structure ◽  
Solar Wind Structure ◽  
Long Term Trends

scholarly journals Dynamic field line draping at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during the Rosetta dayside excursion

2019 ◽  
Vol 630 ◽  
pp. A44
Author(s):  
Martin Volwerk ◽  
Charlotte Goetz ◽  
Etienne Behar ◽  
Magda Delva ◽  
Niklas J. T. Edberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Field Strength ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Field Line ◽  
Magnetic Field Strength ◽  
Cone Angle ◽  
Dynamic Field ◽  
Comet 67P ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Context. The Rosetta dayside excursion took place in September–October 2015 when comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P/CG) was located at ~1.36 AU from the Sun after it had passed perihelion on 13 August 2015 at ~1.25 AU. At this time, the comet was near its most active period, and its interaction with the solar wind was expected to be at its most intense, with ion pickup and magnetic field line draping. The dayside excursion was planned to move through different regions that were expected upstream of the cometary nucleus, and to possibly detect the location of the bow shock. Aims. The goal of this study is to describe the dynamic field line draping that takes place around the comet and the plasma processes that are connected to this. Methods. The data from the full Rosetta Plasma Consortium (RPC) were used to investigate the interaction of solar wind and comet, starting from boxcar-averaged magnetic field data in order to suppress high-frequency noise in the data. Through calculating the cone and clock angle of the magnetic field, we determined the draping pattern of the magnetic field around the nucleus of the comet. Then we studied the particle data in relation to the variations that are observed in the magnetic field. Results. During the dayside excursion, the magnetic field cone angle changed several times, which means that the magnetic field direction changes from pointing sunward to anti-sunward. This is caused by the changing directions of the interplanetary magnetic field that is transported toward the comet. The cone-angle direction shows that mass-loading of the interplanetary magnetic field of the solar wind leads to dynamic draping. The ion velocity and the magnetic field strength are correlated because the unmagnetized ions are accelerated more (less) strongly by the increasing (decreasing) magnetic field strength. There is an indication of an anticorrelation between the electron density and the magnetic field strength, which might be caused by the magnetized electrons being mirrored out of the strong field regions. The Rosetta RPC has shown that (dynamic) draping also occurs as mildly active comets, as was found at highly active comets such as 1P/Halley and 21P/Giacobini-Zinner, but also that determining both dynamic and nested draping will require a combination of fast flybys and slow excursions for future missions.

Empirical inner boundary conditions and rotation rates for solar wind models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huw Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Coronal Magnetic Field ◽  
Height Range ◽  
Rotation Rates ◽  
Wind Structure ◽  
Solar Wind Structure ◽  
Coronal Electron ◽  
Made In

<p>To date, the inner boundary conditions for solar wind models are either directly or indirectly based on magnetic field extrapolation models of the photosphere. Furthermore, between the photosphere and Earth, there are no other direct empirical constraints on models. New breakthroughs in coronal rotation tomography, applied to coronagraph observations, allow maps of the coronal electron density to be made in the heliocentric height range 4-12 solar radii (Rs). We show that these maps (i) give a new empirical boundary condition for solar wind structure at a height where the coronal magnetic field has become radial, thus avoiding the need to model the complex inner coronal magnetic field, and (ii) give accurate rotation rates for the corona, of crucial importance to the accuracy of solar wind models and forecasts.</p>

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field Strength Using the Cosmic-Ray Shadow of the Sun

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Amenomori ◽  
X. J. Bi ◽  
D. Chen ◽  
T. L. Chen ◽  
W. Y. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Field Strength ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Field Strength ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
The Sun

The Long Term Cosmic Ray Variation Relevant to Solar Wind Structure in the Outer Heliosphere

1990 ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
M.V. Alania ◽  
R.G. Aslamazashvili ◽  
T.B. Bochorishvili ◽  
L.I. Dorman ◽  
R.T. Guschina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Cosmic Ray ◽  
Outer Heliosphere ◽  
Wind Structure ◽  
Solar Wind Structure

The dependence of upstream wave periods on the interplanetary magnetic field strength

1981 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. T. Russell ◽  
M. M. Hoppe
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Field Strength ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Field Strength

scholarly journals Radial dependence of foreshock cavities: a case study

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 4143-4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Sibeck ◽  
K. Kudela ◽  
T. Mukai ◽  
Z. Nemecek ◽  
J. Safrankova
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Field Strength ◽  
Magnetic Field Strength ◽  
Bow Shock ◽  
Radial Dependence ◽  
Energetic Ions ◽  
Interplanetary Physics ◽  
Bow Shocks

Abstract. We present a case study of Geotail, Interball-1, IMP-8, and Wind observations of density and magnetic field strength cavities excavated by the enhanced pressures associated with bursts of energetic ions in the foreshock. Consistent with theoretical predictions, the pressure of the energetic ions diminishes rapidly with upstream distance due to a decrease in the flux of energetic ions and a transition from near-isotropic to streaming pitch angle distributions. Consequently, the cavities can only be observed immediately upstream from the bow shock. A comparison of conditions upstream from the pre- and post-noon bow shock demonstrates that foreshock cavities introduce perturbations into the oncoming solar wind flow with dimensions smaller than those of the magnetosphere. Dayside geosynchronous magnetic field strength variations observed by GOES-8 do not track the density variations seen by any of the spacecraft upstream from the bow shock in a one-to-one manner, indicating that none of these spacecraft observed the precise sequence of density variations that actually struck the subsolar magnetopause. Key words. Interplanetary physics (energetic particles; planetary bow shocks) – Magnetospheric physics (solar wind-magnetosphere interactions)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document