Solar Wind Anomalies at 1 au and Their Associations with Large-scale Structures

We study solar wind anomalies and their associations with solar wind structures using the STEREO solar wind and suprathermal electron (STE) data from IMPACT and PLASTIC. We define solar wind anomalies as temporary and local excursions from the average solar wind state, regardless of their origins, for six anomalies: sunward strahls, counterstreaming suprathermal electrons, suprathermal electron depletions, nearly radial magnetic field episodes, anomalously low proton temperatures, and anomalously low proton beta. We first establish the solar wind synoptic contour displays, which show the expected variations in solar wind structure during the solar cycle: recurrent corotating heliospheric magnetic field (HMF) and stream structures are dominant during solar quiet times around the solar minimum (2008 December) preceding cycle 24, while complex structures characterize solar active times around the solar maximum (2014 April). During the declining phase of the cycle (2016–2019), the stream structures remain complex, but the HMF sectors show the structures of the solar minimum. We then systematically study the six anomalies by analyzing the STE data using automated procedures. All anomalies present some degree of dependence on the large-scale solar wind structure, especially around the solar minimum, implying that the solar wind structure plays a role in either the generation or transportation of these anomalies. One common feature of all of the anomalies is that the distributions of the durations of the anomalous episodes all peak at the 1 hr data resolution, but monotonically decrease over longer durations, which may arguably imply that solar anomalies occur on a continuum of temporal and spatial scales.

Solar-Wind Structures That Are Not Destroyed by the Action of Solar-Wind Turbulence

If MHD turbulence is a dominant process acting in the solar wind between the Sun and 1 AU, then the destruction and regeneration of structure in the solar-wind plasma is expected. Six types of solar-wind structure at 1 AU that are not destroyed by turbulence are examined: 1) corotating-interaction-region stream interfaces, 2) periodic density structures, 3) magnetic structure anisotropy, 4) ion-composition boundaries and their co-located current sheets, 5) strahl-intensity boundaries and their co-located current sheets, and 6) non-evolving Alfvénic magnetic structure. Implications for the solar wind and for turbulence in the solar wind are highlighted and a call for critical future solar-wind measurements is given.

Numerical Study of Divergence Cleaning and Coronal Heating/Acceleration Methods in the 3D COIN-TVD MHD Model

In the solar coronal numerical simulation, the coronal heating/acceleration and the magnetic divergence cleaning techniques are very important. The coronal–interplanetary total variation diminishing (COIN-TVD) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) model is developed in recent years that can effectively realize the coronal–interplanetary three-dimensional (3D) solar wind simulation. In this study, we focus on the 3D coronal solar wind simulation by using the COIN-TVD MHD model. In order to simulate the heating and acceleration of solar wind in the coronal region, the volume heating term in the model is improved efficiently. Then, the influence of the different methods to reduce the ∇⋅B constraint error on the coronal solar wind structure is discussed. Here, we choose Carrington Rotation (CR) 2199 as a study case and try to make a comparison of the simulation results among the different magnetic divergence cleaning methods, including the diffusive method, the Powell method, and the composite diffusive/Powell method, by using the 3D COIN-TVD MHD model. Our simulation results show that with the different magnetic divergence cleaning methods, the ∇⋅B error can be reduced in different levels during the solar wind simulation. Among the three divergence cleaning methods we used, the composite diffusive/Powell method can maintain the divergence cleaning constraint better to a certain extent, and the relative magnetic field divergence error can be controlled in the order of 10−9. Although these numerical simulations are performed for the background solar corona, these methods are also suitable for the simulation of CME initiation and propagation.

The asymmetric geospace response to rapid changes in solar wind pressure

<p>The geospace response to rapid changes in solar wind pressure results in a perturbation of the magnetospheric-ionospheric system. Ground magnetometer stations located at polar latitudes have long been known to measure a sudden impulse only minutes after a solar wind structure reaches the magnetopause.<br>Here a list of events associated with a step-like feature in the solar wind dynamic pressure between 1994 and 2020 is compiled based on in situ observations from ACE and Wind. Arrival time estimates are calculated using a simple propagation method and validated with a correlation analysis using SYM-H from low/mid latitude stations. A superposed epoch analysis is carried out to investigate the impact of season, interplanetary magnetic field orientation and other attributes pertaining to the interplanetary shock. All available ground magnetometer stations in SuperMAG, during each event, are used allowing for global coverage. <br>Global data coverage is important for this kind of comparative analysis as it is needed to determine changes in the systems response due to e.g. season, which might lead to an improved understanding of the magnetospheric-ionospheric-thermospheric coupling.</p>

Structure and connectivity of CME-driven shocks and sheaths through the inner heliosphere

<p>The evolution of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) as they travel away from the Sun is one of the major issues in heliophysics and space weather. During propagation, CMEs and the structures ahead of them (i.e., interplanetary shocks and sheath regions, if present) are significantly affected by the ambient solar wind, which is able to alter their speed, trajectory, and orientation. The scarcity of multi-spacecraft measurements of the same CME, however, implies that little is known about how and where (in terms of distance from the Sun) these various processes exactly come into play.</p><p>To address this issue, we run a series of 3D magnetohydrodynamic simulations using the coupled solar–heliospheric WSA–Enlil model, in which we launch idealised CMEs as hydrodynamic (non-magnetised) structures. This allows us to focus on the evolution of CME-driven shocks and sheath regions through a multi-point study. We launch CMEs of various speeds through different solar wind backgrounds and at different heliolongitudes with respect to the streamer belt position. Then, we investigate the resulting magnetic field and plasma parameters at a series of synthetic spacecraft placed at various longitudes around the CME apex and at various heliocentric distances between 0.5 AU and 2 AU. We also analyse how the magnetic connectivity at these spacecraft evolves as the CME propagates. This work represents a comprehensive study of the interaction of CME-driven shocks and sheath regions with the large-scale solar wind structure throughout the inner heliosphere, with the aim to establish a range of expected behaviours and outcomes useful to interpret real events.</p>

Empirical inner boundary conditions and rotation rates for solar wind models

<p>To date, the inner boundary conditions for solar wind models are either directly or indirectly based on magnetic field extrapolation models of the photosphere. Furthermore, between the photosphere and Earth, there are no other direct empirical constraints on models. New breakthroughs in coronal rotation tomography, applied to coronagraph observations, allow maps of the coronal electron density to be made in the heliocentric height range 4-12 solar radii (Rs). We show that these maps (i) give a new empirical boundary condition for solar wind structure at a height where the coronal magnetic field has become radial, thus avoiding the need to model the complex inner coronal magnetic field, and (ii) give accurate rotation rates for the corona, of crucial importance to the accuracy of solar wind models and forecasts.</p>