scholarly journals New Recognition for Major Players in the Ocean’s Silicon Cycle

Eos ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Stanley
Keyword(s):  

Tiny, shelled protists known as Rhizaria may be responsible for up to one fifth of the total amount of silica produced by the world’s oceanic organisms.

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhouling Zhang ◽  
Xiaole Sun ◽  
Minhan Dai ◽  
Zhimian Cao ◽  
Guillaume Fontorbe ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 (6508) ◽  
pp. 1161-1162
Author(s):  
Joanna Carey
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 (6508) ◽  
pp. 1245-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. de Tombeur ◽  
B. L. Turner ◽  
E. Laliberté ◽  
H. Lambers ◽  
G. Mahy ◽  
...  

The biogeochemical silicon cycle influences global primary productivity and carbon cycling, yet changes in silicon sources and cycling during long-term development of terrestrial ecosystems remain poorly understood. Here, we show that terrestrial silicon cycling shifts from pedological to biological control during long-term ecosystem development along 2-million-year soil chronosequences in Western Australia. Silicon availability is determined by pedogenic silicon in young soils and recycling of plant-derived silicon in old soils as pedogenic pools become depleted. Unlike concentrations of major nutrients, which decline markedly in strongly weathered soils, foliar silicon concentrations increase continuously as soils age. Our findings show that the retention of silicon by plants during ecosystem retrogression sustains its terrestrial cycling, suggesting important plant benefits associated with this element in nutrient-poor environments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 454 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 343-358
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Yang ◽  
Zhaoliang Song ◽  
Zhilian Qin ◽  
Lele Wu ◽  
Lichu Yin ◽  
...  

Eos ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 81 (18) ◽  
pp. 198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venugopalan Ittekkot ◽  
Lars Rahm ◽  
Dennis P. Swaney ◽  
Christoph Humborg
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 115 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 176-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Middag ◽  
H.J.W. de Baar ◽  
P. Laan ◽  
K. Bakker

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill N. Sutton ◽  
Luc André ◽  
Damien Cardinal ◽  
Daniel J. Conley ◽  
Gregory F. de Souza ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 4463-4492
Author(s):  
C. Y. Bernard ◽  
G. G. Laruelle ◽  
C. P. Slomp ◽  
C. Heinze

Abstract. The availability of dissolved silica in the ocean provides a major control on the growth of siliceous phytoplankton. Diatoms in particular account for a large proportion of oceanic primary production. The original source of the silica is rock weathering, followed by transport of dissolved and biogenic silica to the coastal zone. This model study aims at assessing the sensitivity of the global marine silicon cycle to variations in the river input of silica and other nutrients on timescales ranging from several centuries to millennia. We compare the performance of a box model for the marine Si cycle to that of a global biogeochemical ocean general circulation model (HAMOCC2 and 5). Results indicate that the average global ocean response to changes in river input of Si is surprisingly similar in the models on time scales up to 150 kyrs. While the trends in export production and opal burial are the same, the box model shows a delayed response to the imposed perturbations compared to the general circulation model. Results of both models confirm the important role of the continental margins as a sink for silica at the global scale. While general circulation models are indispensable when assessing the spatial variation in opal export production and biogenic Si burial in the ocean, this study demonstrates that box models provide a good alternative when studying the average global ocean response to perturbations of the oceanic silica cycle (especially on longer time scales).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document