Moisture fluctuations modulate abiotic and biotic limitations of H 2 soil uptake

Author(s):  
Matteo B. Bertagni ◽  
Fabien Paulot ◽  
Amilcare Porporato
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Najeeb A. Iddris ◽  
Marife D. Corre ◽  
Oliver Straaten ◽  
Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi ◽  
Edzo Veldkamp

2013 ◽  
Vol 373 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 415-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junliang Xin ◽  
Baifei Huang ◽  
Aiqun Liu ◽  
Wenjing Zhou ◽  
Kebing Liao

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 832-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Therese Meyer ◽  
Samuel Rodrigues Castro ◽  
Marcus Manoel Fernandes ◽  
Aylton Carlos Soares ◽  
Guilherme Augusto de Souza Freitas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sveta Thakur ◽  
Lakhveer Singh ◽  
Zularisam Ab Wahid ◽  
Muhammad Faisal Siddiqui ◽  
Samson Mekbib Atnaw ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 1361-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putian Zhou ◽  
Laurens Ganzeveld ◽  
Üllar Rannik ◽  
Luxi Zhou ◽  
Rosa Gierens ◽  
...  

Abstract. A multi-layer ozone (O3) dry deposition model has been implemented into SOSAA (a model to Simulate the concentrations of Organic vapours, Sulphuric Acid and Aerosols) to improve the representation of O3 concentration and flux within and above the forest canopy in the planetary boundary layer. We aim to predict the O3 uptake by a boreal forest canopy under varying environmental conditions and analyse the influence of different factors on total O3 uptake by the canopy as well as the vertical distribution of deposition sinks inside the canopy. The newly implemented dry deposition model was validated by an extensive comparison of simulated and observed O3 turbulent fluxes and concentration profiles within and above the boreal forest canopy at SMEAR II (Station to Measure Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations II) in Hyytiälä, Finland, in August 2010. In this model, the fraction of wet surface on vegetation leaves was parametrised according to the ambient relative humidity (RH). Model results showed that when RH was larger than 70 % the O3 uptake onto wet skin contributed ∼ 51 % to the total deposition during nighttime and ∼ 19 % during daytime. The overall contribution of soil uptake was estimated about 36 %. The contribution of sub-canopy deposition below 4.2 m was modelled to be ∼ 38 % of the total O3 deposition during daytime, which was similar to the contribution reported in previous studies. The chemical contribution to O3 removal was evaluated directly in the model simulations. According to the simulated averaged diurnal cycle the net chemical production of O3 compensated up to ∼ 4 % of dry deposition loss from about 06:00 to 15:00 LT. During nighttime, the net chemical loss of O3 further enhanced removal by dry deposition by a maximum ∼ 9 %. Thus the results indicated an overall relatively small contribution of airborne chemical processes to O3 removal at this site.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (13) ◽  
pp. 2765-2772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Washington J. Braida ◽  
Jason C. White ◽  
Francis J. Ferrandino ◽  
Joseph J. Pignatello

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 4059-4103 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Yashiro ◽  
K. Sudo ◽  
S. Yonemura ◽  
M. Takigawa

Abstract. The molecular hydrogen (H2) in the troposphere is highly influenced by the strength of H2 uptake by the terrestrial soil surface. The global distribution of H2 and its uptake by the soil are simulated by using a model called CHemical AGCM for Study of Environment and Radiative forcing (CHASER), which incorporates a 2-layered soil diffusion/uptake process component. The simulated distribution of deposition velocity over land reflects regional climate and has a global average of 3.3 × 10−2 cm s−1. In the region north of 30° N, the amount of soil uptake increases, particularly in the summer. However, the increase in the uptake becomes smaller in the winter season due to snow cover and a reduction in the biological activity at low temperatures. In the temperate and humid regions in the mid- and low-latitudes, the uptake is mostly influenced by the soil air ratio, which controls the gas diffusivity in the soil. In the semi-arid region, water stress and high temperature contribute to the reduction of biological activity, as well as to the seasonal variation in the deposition velocity. The comparison with the observations shows that the model reproduces both the distribution and seasonal variation of H2 relatively well. The global burden and tropospheric lifetime are 150 Tg and 2.0 yr, respectively. The seasonal variation of H2 in the northern high latitude is mainly controlled by the large seasonal change in soil uptake. In the Southern Hemisphere, the seasonal change in the net chemical production and inter-hemispheric transport are the dominant cause of the seasonal cycle. Large biomass burning impacts the magnitude of seasonal variation mainly in the tropics and subtropics. Both observation and model show large inter-annual variation, especially for the period 1997–1998, associated with the large biomass burning in tropics and northern high-latitudes. The soil uptake shows relatively small inter-annual variability compared to the signal from biomass burning. We note that the thickness of biologically inactive layer near the soil surface and the uptake flux in semi-arid region is important for the current and future budget of atmospheric H2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document