Simultaneous observations of auroral zone electrodynamics by two satellites: Evidence for height variations in the topside ionosphere

1981 ◽  
Vol 86 (A11) ◽  
pp. 8929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick J. Rich ◽  
Cynthia A. Cattell ◽  
Michael C. Kelley ◽  
William J. Burke
2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-749
Author(s):  
N. I. Izhovkina ◽  
I. S. Prutensky ◽  
S. A. Pulinets ◽  
Z. Klos ◽  
H. Rothkaehl

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-213
Author(s):  
Alv Egeland ◽  
William J. Burke

Abstract. Auroral spectroscopy provided the first tool for remotely sensing the compositions and dynamics of the high-latitude ionosphere. In 1885, Balmer discovered that the visible hydrogen spectrum consists of a series of discrete lines whose wavelengths follow a simple mathematical pattern, which ranks among the first steps toward developing this tool. On 18 October 1939 Lars Vegard discovered the Hα (656.3 nm) and Hβ (486.1 nm) spectral lines of Balmer series emissions, emanating from a diffuse structure, located equatorward of the auroral zone. Intense, first positive bands of N2+ nearly covered the Hα emissions. With more advanced instrumentation after World War II, auroral spectroscopists Vegard, Gartlein and Meinel investigated other characteristics of the auroral hydrogen emissions. The first three lines of the Balmer series, including Hγ at 410 nm, were identified in ground-based measurements prior to the space age. Based on satellite observations, the Balmer lines Hδ and Hε at 410.13 and 396.97 nm, respectively, as well as extreme ultraviolet (EUV) Lyman α (121.6 nm) hydrogen emissions, were also detected. Doppler blue shifts in hydrogen emissions, established in the 1940s, indicated that emitting particles had energies well into the kiloelectron volt range, corresponding to velocities >1000 km s−1. Systematic spatial separations between the locations of electron- and proton-generated aurorae were also established. These observations in turn, suggested that protons, ultimately of solar origin, precipitate into the topside ionosphere, where they undergo charge-exchange events with atmospheric neutrals. Newly generated hydrogen atoms were left in excited states and emitted the observed Balmer radiation. Sounding rocket data showed that most of the hydrogen radiation came from altitudes between 105 and 120 km. Space-age data from satellite-borne sensors made two significant contributions: (1) energetic particle detectors demonstrated the existence of regions in the magnetosphere, conjugate to nightside proton aurora, where conditions for breaking the first adiabatic invariants of kiloelectron volt protons prevail, allowing them to precipitate through filled loss cones. (2) EUV imagers showed that dayside hydrogen emissions appear in response to changes in solar wind dynamic pressure or the polarity of the north–south component of the interplanetary magnetic field.


Intense noise bands have been observed by the Ariel 4 r.f. experiment operating at frequencies between 0.25 and 4 MHz in the topside ionosphere. An examination of the frequency coverage of the bands shows that they are mainly confined to those domains which correspond to a high refractive index of the medium. The 0 mode whistler band appears in a range which extends from the lowest frequency of measurement mainly up to the gyrofrequency. The X mode upper-hybrid band extends from a lower limit which depends on the local plasma frequency, to a frequency slightly beyond the upper-hybrid resonance frequency. Both bands attain their highest levels in the auroral zone at latitudes where electrons in the hundreds of eV range are most numerous. On the dayside the latitude of these highest levels depends on the K p value. By carrying out a calculation of the Cerenkov radiation from the energetic electrons present, a determination of the frequency spectrum of the whistler noise at m.f. is made and found to fit well with the measured data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola De Michelis ◽  
Giuseppe Consolini ◽  
Alessio Pignalberi ◽  
Roberta Tozzi ◽  
Igino Coco ◽  
...  

AbstractThe present work focuses on the analysis of the scaling features of electron density fluctuations in the mid- and high-latitude topside ionosphere under different conditions of geomagnetic activity. The aim is to understand whether it is possible to identify a proxy that may provide information on the properties of electron density fluctuations and on the possible physical mechanisms at their origin, as for instance, turbulence phenomena. So, we selected about 4 years (April 2014–February 2018) of 1 Hz electron density measurements recorded on-board ESA Swarm A satellite. Using the Auroral Electrojet (AE) index, we identified two different geomagnetic conditions: quiet (AE < 50 nT) and active (AE > 300 nT). For both datasets, we evaluated the first- and second-order scaling exponents and an intermittency coefficient associated with the electron density fluctuations. Then, the joint probability distribution between each of these quantities and the rate of change of electron density index was also evaluated. We identified two families of plasma density fluctuations characterized by different mean values of both the scaling exponents and the considered ionospheric index, suggesting that different mechanisms (instabilities/turbulent processes) can be responsible for the observed scaling features. Furthermore, a clear different localization of the two families in the magnetic latitude—magnetic local time plane is found and its dependence on geomagnetic activity levels is analyzed. These results may well have a bearing about the capability of recognizing the turbulent character of irregularities using a typical ionospheric plasma irregularity index as a proxy.


The instruments which measure electron density and temperature are quite separate and independent in operation, but on account of the limitations in power supply and telemetry data rate the two experiments share the same power lines and some data channels.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Chernyshov ◽  
A. A. Ilyasov ◽  
M. M. Mogilevskii ◽  
I. V. Golovchanskaya ◽  
B. V. Kozelov

1960 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 3521-3538 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Anderson ◽  
D. C. Enemark
Keyword(s):  
X Rays ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document