Factor structure of the Counselor Rating Form—Short.

1988 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence J. Tracey ◽  
Cynthia E. Glidden ◽  
Anna M. Kokotovic
1983 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Thomas Dowd ◽  
Ann G. Hingst

The theory of neurolinguistic programming predicts that a therapist's matching of a client's primary representational system, as expressed in the client's predicates, should result in increased therapist's rapport and social influence. This hypothesis was tested in an actual interview situation. Six relatively inexperienced therapists, two each in predicate matching, predicate mismatching, and predicate no-matching conditions, conducted a 30-min. interview with nine undergraduate student volunteers each, for a total of 54 subjects. After the appropriate interview condition was completed, subjects rated their therapists on the Counselor Rating Form and the Counseling Evaluation Inventory. No significant differences among the three conditions on any of the measures were found. Results are compared with those of previous research on assessment and primary representational system matching in analogue situations.


1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
WAYNE L. LANNING ◽  
SUE WHISTON ◽  
JOHN C. CAREY
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1179-1186
Author(s):  
Janet A. Khan ◽  
Darryl G. Cross ◽  
Len Dalgleish ◽  
E. Bevan Wiltshire

This investigation concerned identifying the kinds of therapeutic variables considered by observers both to differentiate between and to contribute to clients' positive change in behavioral and insight-oriented therapies. The observers were 141 introductory psychology students who viewed the sixth session of either a behavioral or an insight approach. They completed the Truax Relationship Questionnaire, Barak and La Crosse Counselor Rating Form, and Sloane, et al. Psychotherapy Questionnaire which tap a range of potentially relevant therapeutic variables. A number of multiple regression analyses showed a significant differential perception of the two theoretical orientations. The unique and relative contributions of task and interpersonal variables are highlighted.


1982 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 523-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Mc Kay ◽  
E. Thomas Dowd ◽  
Stephen A. Roixin

48 clients in a rehabilitation center viewed two 12-min. videotapes each, one depicting a counselor high in social influence and the other one of low influence. They then rated the counselors on the Counselor Rating Form and the Empathy subscale of the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory. Black subjects and subjects at lower educational levels rated the counselor of low social influence significantly higher than did whites and better educated subjects on all measures. White subjects and subjects at higher educational levels rated the counselor of high social influence significantly higher on Trustworthiness and Empathy than did blacks and less educated subjects. Results are discussed in light of the research on clients' characteristics as mediating variables in the counseling process and outcome.


1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Corrigan ◽  
Lyle D. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Brittain

The counselling effectiveness of guidance officers (GOs) was examined in a study involving 21 State secondary schools in Queensland. Students from Year 8 to Year 12 from each school were asked to rate the level of satisfaction with a counselling session. This was measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) developed by Larsen, Attkisson, Hargreaves and Nguyen (1979). Based on Strong's (1968) Social Influence model, counselling was assumed to be an interpersonal influence process. Therefore these students also rated their perceptions of a GO's counselling attributes on the Counselor Rating Form – Short Version (CRF-S; Corrigan & Schmidt, 1983). Results indicated that ratings on the 12 CRF-S items as a total as well as a number of individual items significantly predicted CSQ scores. Student ratings on both questionnaires were high and possible explanations are considered. Also, several GO and student variables (e.g. sex of student, willingness, year level) were found to significantly predict satisfaction. Additionally, a number of these GO and student variables (e.g. GO and sex of student, willingness, the number of counselling sessions) were also found to differentially affect students' perceptions of GOs' counselling attributes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document