Is It Prudent to Administer All Items for Each Child Behavior Checklist Cross-Informant Syndrome? Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Youth Self-Report Dimensions With Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory.

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 550-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Canute Lambert ◽  
Neal Schmitt ◽  
Maureen E. Samms-Vaughan ◽  
Jeong Shin An ◽  
Maureen Fairclough ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Item Response Theory ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Child Behavior ◽  
Child Behavior Checklist ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Youth Self Report ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

scholarly journals Psychometric Properties and Structures of the IAT, GPIUS and GAS Scales: A Bifactor Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingling Xu ◽  
Yan Cai ◽  
Dongbo Tu
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Internet Addiction ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Item Response Model ◽  
Multidimensional Item Response ◽  
Test Information ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

AbstractThis study applied a bifactor approach to investigate the structures and simultaneously compare the psychometric properties of three popular self-report internet addiction (IA) instruments. A bifactor confirmatory factor analysis was used to address the structures of the three scales, while the bifactor multidimensional item response model was employed to compare the psychometric properties of the three scales. Results of bifactor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the bifactor structures were suitable for the three scales. These corresponding bifactor structures were used in the subsequent bifactor multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) analysis. Results of the bifactor MIRT showed that: three instruments of IA performed well as a whole; the Generalised Problematic Internet Use Scale (GPIUS) and Internet Addiction Test (IAT) provided more test information and had less standard error of measurement, which ranged from −3 to −1 standard deviations of theta or IA severity; the Game Addiction Scale (GAS) performed better than the other two scales in that it can provide more test information in the large area of IA severity (from −1 to +3 SDs). These suggest that the GPIUS and IAT may be the best choice for epidemiological IA studies and for measuring those with lower IA severity. Meanwhile, the GAS may be a good choice when we recruit those with various levels of IA severity.

scholarly journals Evidence of Validity of a Modern Homonegativity Measure against Gays and Lesbians

Psico-USF ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaline da Silva Lima ◽  
Juliana Maria Vieira Tenório ◽  
Francisco Romário ◽  
Luã Medeiros Fernandes de Melo ◽  
Josemberg Moura de Andrade
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Item Response Theory ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Item Response ◽  
The Other ◽  
Validity Evidence ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Parallel Forms ◽  
High Degree

Abstract The goal of this research was to adapt and obtain validity evidence of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which is set by two parallel forms with 12 items, one of them referring to gays (MHS-G) and the other referring to lesbians (MHS-L). In the first study 418 heterosexuals between 18 and 58 years old (M = 24,9; SD = 7,23), mostly women (66,3%) living at João Pessoa-PB (50,5%) answered. Both scales have shown as unidimensional and containing a high degree of internal consistency. The second study had the participation of 273 heterosexuals between 18 and 55 years old (M = 23,7; SD = 6,33), mostly women (69%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory adjustment indexes for the proposed model and the Item Response Theory (IRT) demonstrated a good degree of discrimination and variation of the difficulty parameters. Therefore, we may conclude MHS is psychometrically valid, easily applicable and can be used in research contexts.

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-PI-R self-evaluation form in Slovak translation

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Elena Lisá ◽  
◽  
Michael Dzúrik ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analysis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Medium Effect ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

The study aimed to verify the psychometric properties of the 100-item HEXACO-PI-R questionnaire. The sample consisted of 1624 adults aged from 16 to 79 years (M=34.5, SD=13.35) who filled the paper-pen self-report form of the HEXACO-PI-R. The average internal consistency of the six factors was α=.78 (from .72 for Openness to .81 for Honesty-Humility) and α=.60 for facets. The Altruism scale in the Slovak translation did not reach a satisfactory internal consistency (α=.29). Mean values in the Slovak-speaking sample were 3.29, and standard deviations .53 for factor level and .74 at the facet level. Sex differences showed the higher Emotionality (d=.99) and Honesty-Humility (d= .38) in women. Age differences in Honesty-Humility showed a medium effect size. Factors did not inter-correlate, or they correlated weakly, except for r=.34 in the relationship between Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility. The factors were well distinguished from one another. The exploratory factor analysis with Promax rotation confirmed the six-factor model, which explained in total 44% of data variance, with an average loading of .60. Individual one-factor models met most of the goodness of fit criteria in confirmatory factor analysis, but the six-factor model did not meet them. The controversy associated with assessing the internal structure of multidimensional personality inventories by confirmatory factor analysis is discussed. According to the currently published research studies, the research findings supported the reliability and internal validity of HEXACO-PI-R in Slovak translation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document