scholarly journals Treatment of depression and PTSD in primary care clinics serving uninsured low-income mostly Latina/o immigrants: A naturalistic prospective evaluation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey Kaltman ◽  
Maria Rosa Watson ◽  
Marcela Campoli ◽  
Adriana Serrano ◽  
Nicholas Talisman ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rose L Harding ◽  
Jennifer D Hall ◽  
Jennifer DeVoe ◽  
Heather Angier ◽  
Rachel Gold ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L. Thomas ◽  
Phillip J. Brantley

Given the high rates of major depressive disorder in primary care settings, routine use of screening measures to assist in identifying depressed individuals is warranted. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) ( Radloff, 1977 ) is a self-rated measure of distress commonly used to screen for depression in primary care settings. The present study was undertaken to confirm the original four-factor model in a sample of low-income women attending primary care clinics (N = 179). Although the original four-factor structure has been replicated in a variety of population groups, internal validity of the measure has not been previously examined in this population sample. A series of confirmatory factor analytic procedures failed to replicate the original four-factor structure or a second-order model. An exploratory analysis, using principal components and a VARIMAX rotation yielded three factors: Depressed Affect/Somatic Symptoms, Positive Affect, and Interpersonal Difficulties. Results of this study add support to previous research documenting an increased somatic presentation of depression in low-income samples. Implications for the use of the CES-D as a screening tool to identify depression in similar primary care samples are discussed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Uebelacker ◽  
Marcia Smith ◽  
Angelique W. Lewis ◽  
Ryan Sasaki ◽  
Ivan W. Miller

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. e20174019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Wolf ◽  
Camille J. Hochheimer ◽  
Roy T. Sabo ◽  
Jennifer DeVoe ◽  
Richard Wasserman ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel C. Scarinci ◽  
Janet Thomas ◽  
Phillip J. Brantley ◽  
Glenn N. Jones

Purpose. To determine the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) by smoking status, and the temporal relationship between smoking and MDD, and explore other smoking-related variables that may be associated with MDD. Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. Public primary care clinics. Subjects. Researchers studied 338 women (76% African-Americans) who were randomly selected while attending appointments in two public primary care clinics. Measures. Data pertaining to smoking-related variables and MDD diagnosis were obtained using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV). Results. The prevalence of a lifetime history of MDD was significantly higher for current smokers (56.6%) than among former smokers (37.5%) or never-smokers (30.3%; p < .001). Most ever-smokers (81.3%) began smoking and were nicotine-dependent (63.6%) prior to their first episode of MDD. Using logistic regression, after controlling for demographic and smoking-related variables, age of smoking onset was the strongest variable associated with MDD among ever-smokers. Specifically, the odds of having an MDD decreased by 8.2% for each year delay in smoking initiation. Conclusion. These results suggest that smoking initiation precedes MDD and that smoking is associated with a high prevalence of MDD among low-income women attending primary care clinics. Further, the younger women start smoking the more likely they are to have MDD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document