Responding to barriers to treatment in United States and United Kingdom veterans: A response on “Improving engagement in evidence-based psychological treatment among veterans: Direct-to-consumer outreach and pretreatment shared decision-making”.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-322
Author(s):  
Lucy Anne Abraham ◽  
Patricia Graham
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Barriers To Treatment ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Direct To Consumer

scholarly journals Evidence-based medicine, shared decision making and the hidden curriculum: a qualitative content analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-180
Author(s):  
Emélie Braschi ◽  
Dawn Stacey ◽  
France Légaré ◽  
Roland Grad ◽  
Douglas Archibald
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Hidden Curriculum ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Based Medicine

scholarly journals Engaging Multidisciplinary Stakeholders to Drive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Rocque ◽  
Ellen Miller-Sonnet ◽  
Alan Balch ◽  
Carrie Stricker ◽  
Josh Seidman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Oncology Practice ◽  
Development And Validation

Although recognized as best practice, regular integration of shared decision-making (SDM) approaches between patients and oncologists remains an elusive goal. It is clear that usable, feasible, and practical tools are needed to drive increased SDM in oncology. To address this goal, we convened a multidisciplinary collaborative inclusive of experts across the health-care delivery ecosystem to identify key principles in designing and testing processes to promote SDM in routine oncology practice. In this commentary, we describe 3 best practices for addressing challenges associated with implementing SDM that emerged from a multidisciplinary collaborative: (1) engagement of diverse stakeholders who have interest in SDM, (2) development and validation of an evidence-based SDM tool grounded within an established conceptual framework, and (3) development of the necessary roadmap and consideration of the infrastructure needed for engendering patient engagement in decision-making. We believe these 3 principles are critical to the success of creating SDM tools to be utilized both within and outside of clinical practice. We are optimistic that shared use across settings will support adoption of this tool and overcome barriers to implementing SDM within busy clinical workflows. Ultimately, we hope that this work will offer new perspectives on what is important to patients and provide an important impetus for leveraging patient preferences and values in decision-making.

scholarly journals Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dévan Rajendran ◽  
Jane Beazley ◽  
Philip Bright
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision

scholarly journals When shared decision‐making and evidence based practice clash: Infant sleep practices

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1009-1012
Author(s):  
Ben Gray ◽  
Tumaini R Coker
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Infant Sleep ◽  
Shared Decision

scholarly journals The systematic use of evidence‐based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision‐making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-71
Author(s):  
Hans Van Remoortel ◽  
Kari Aranko ◽  
Markus M. Mueller ◽  
Emmy De Buck ◽  
Dana Devine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Conference ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Patient Blood Management ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Blood Management ◽  
International Consensus

scholarly journals What are the links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in training programs for junior doctors? A scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e037225
Author(s):  
Mary Simons ◽  
Frances Rapport ◽  
Yvonne Zurynski ◽  
Jeremy Cullis ◽  
Andrew Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centred Care ◽  
Based Medicine

IntroductionPatient-centred care is pivotal to clinical practice and medical education. The practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision-making (SDM) are complementary aspects of patient-centred care, but they are frequently taught and reported as independent entities. To effectively perform all steps of EBM, clinicians need to include patients in SDM conversations, however, the uptake of this has been slow and inconsistent. A solution may be the incorporation of SDM into EBM training programmes, but such programmes do not routinely include SDM skills development. This scoping review will survey the literature on the kinds of EBM and SDM educational programmes that exist for recently qualified doctors, programmes that incorporate the teaching of both EBM and SDM skills, as well as identifying research gaps in the literature.Methods and analysisLiterature searches will be conducted in the databases Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library. Bibliographies of key articles and their citing references will also be hand-searched and assessed for inclusion. Selected grey literature will be included. Papers must be written in English, or provide English abstracts, and date from 1996 to the present day.Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, check full texts of selected papers for eligibility and extract the data. Any disagreement will be resolved, and consensus reached, if necessary, with the assistance of a third reviewer. Qualitative and quantitative studies that address educational interventions for either EBM, SDM or both will be included. Data extraction tables will present bibliographic information, populations, interventions, context and outcomes. Data will be summarised using tables and figures and a description of findings.Ethics and disseminationThis review will synthesise information from publicly available publications and does not require ethics approval. The results will be disseminated via conference presentations and publications in medical journals.

Integrating Patient Values into Evidence-Based Practice: Effective Communication for Shared Decision-Making

Hand Clinics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Vranceanu ◽  
Cynthia Cooper ◽  
David Ring
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Effective Communication ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Values

A qualitative analysis of implementing shared decision making in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the United Kingdom: Stages and facilitators

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neus Abrines-Jaume ◽  
Nick Midgley ◽  
Katy Hopkins ◽  
Jasmine Hoffman ◽  
Kate Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Child And Adolescent ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
The United Kingdom
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document