The APA Task Force on sex bias and sex role stereotyping in psychotherapeutic practice

1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Brodsky ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Anne Kenworthy ◽  
Corinne Koufacos ◽  
Julia Sherman

Two hundred and ninety-nine internship programs and selected psychology graduate schools were surveyed by mail regarding their opinions and practices relevant to training in psychotherapy for women. The 94 usable replies included 55% of all APA approved programs. The results indicated that only a minority of training facilities deal in a systematic way with issues of sex bias and sex-role stereotyping in psychological practice. About 20% of the respondents expressed a need to improve their programs. Respondents' answers are detailed and the suggestion is made that egalitarian group supervisory meetings afford more opportunity than individual sessions to deal effectively with issues of sex bias and stereotyping.


1973 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry Saario ◽  
Carol Nagy Jacklin ◽  
Carol Kehr Tittle

The authors investigate sex role stereotyping in three major areas: elementary school basal readers, educational achievement tests, and difjerential auricular requirements for males and females. The section on basal readers documents the extent and kind of sex role stereotyping in the kindergarten to third grade textbooks of four major publishers. The section on educational testing raises the issue of sex bias in item content and language usage and shows the presence of sex role stereotyping in test batteries from major test publishing companies. The curriculum section discusses the presence and ramifications of different curriculum patterns for males and females.


1986 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne L. Chambless ◽  
Jeanne Mason

1983 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 290-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith M. Dixon

Women and disabled persons are both stigmatized by today's culture. In the general population, 58 percent of females are in the labor force; among blind or visually impaired persons, only 29 percent of females are employed or looking for work. One factor in this situation is the disincentive to work built into the disability benefit programs, although women are apt to receive a lower level of benefits than men. Other factors are employer attitudes toward blindness, and sex-role stereotyping. Major strategies for overcoming barriers include timely and accurate vocational preparation, assertiveness training, and support networks.


1976 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Thomas Cegelka

An examination of special education practices relative to secondary work study programs for the mentally retarded reveals sex biases in favor of the male enrollees. These biases are apparent in program admission, program offerings, and program evaluation. Both ethical and legal considerations dictate that those practices which serve to doubly handicap individuals labeled both retarded and female be eradicated. Suggestions are made for assessing and restructuring secondary work study programs in order to provide equal quality of participation for all.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document