Enhancing S4 with Guidance from the Features of Other Behavior Modeling Systems

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N. Cassenti ◽  
Charneta L. Samms
Fire Ecology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy A. Drury

Abstract Background Fire managers tasked with assessing the hazard and risk of wildfire in Alaska, USA, tend to have more confidence in fire behavior prediction modeling systems developed in Canada than similar systems developed in the US. In 1992, Canadian fire behavior systems were adopted for modeling fire hazard and risk in Alaska and are used by fire suppression specialists and fire planners working within the state. However, as new US-based fire behavior modeling tools are developed, Alaskan fire managers are encouraged to adopt the use of US-based systems. Few studies exist in the scientific literature that inform fire managers as to the efficacy of fire behavior modeling tools in Alaska. In this study, I provide information to aid fire managers when tasked with deciding which system for modeling fire behavior is most appropriate for their use. On the Magitchlie Creek Fire in Alaska, I systematically collected fire behavior characteristics within a black spruce (Picea mariana [Mill.] Britton, Sterns & Poggenb.) ecosystem under head fire conditions. I compared my fire behavior observations including flame length, rate of spread, and head fire intensity with fire behavior predictions from the US fire modeling system BehavePlus, and three Canadian systems: RedAPP, CanFIRE, and the Crown Fire Initiation and Spread system (CFIS). Results All four modeling systems produced reasonable rate of spread predictions although the Canadian systems provided predictions slightly closer to the observed fire behavior. The Canadian fire behavior prediction modeling systems RedAPP and CanFIRE provided more accurate predictions of head fire intensity and fire type than BehavePlus or CFIS. Conclusions The most appropriate fire behavior modeling system for use in Alaskan black spruce ecosystems depends on what type of questions are being asked. For determining the rate of fire movement across a landscape, REDapp, CanFIRE, CFIS, or BehavePlus can all be expected to provide reasonably accurate estimates of rate of spread. If fire managers are interested in using predicted flame length or energy produced for informing decisions such as which firefighting tactics will be successful, or for evaluating the ecological impacts due to burning, then the Canadian fire modeling systems outperformed BehavePlus in this case study.


Fire ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Justin P. Ziegler ◽  
Chad M. Hoffman ◽  
William Mell

Wildland fire and ecological researchers use empirical and semi-empirical modeling systems to assess fire behavior and danger. This technical note describes the firebehavioR package, a porting of two fire behavior modeling systems, Crown Fire Initiation and Spread and a Rothermel-based framework, to the R programming language. We also highlight supporting data objects and functions to predict inputs required for fire behavior estimation. Last, this package contains functions for fifteen indices to express fire danger using weather and/or fuels observations. Specific advantages of predicting fire behavior using R, a free-and-open-source programming language, include freedom to adapt calculations to suit users’ needs, transparency of source code, and reduction of workflow inefficiencies, thereby aiding in sophisticated fire behavior analyses.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (98) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
Vladislav A. Kosenko ◽  
◽  
Valeriy O. Kvashnin ◽  

2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohjiro Hashimoto ◽  
Kae Doki ◽  
Shinji Doki ◽  
Shigeru Okuma ◽  
Akihiro Torii

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-80
Author(s):  
E. E. Akimkina

A comparative analysis of different approaches to analytical data and shows that the most ample opportunities has a multi-dimensional approach, implemented with the help of OLAP technology. Presented multidimensional OLAP-cube model with the measurements for the analysis and processing of process data. Practical recommendations for the deployment of a multidimensional data modeling systems with regard to their integration into existing enterprise management system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Smolek ◽  
Bernhard Heinzl ◽  
Horst Ecker ◽  
Felix Breitenecker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document