Information Market

1983 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Larysa Getman ◽  
◽  
Hanna Pshynka ◽  

The information market has distinctive features in comparison with the market for industrial products due to the specificity of the object of market relations - an information product. An information product in a market environment becomes a commodity, while retaining the properties inherent in information. Based on the general definition of the market, the information market is a system of economic relations arising on the basis of commodity and money circulation, which cover the sphere of exchange, production, distribution and consumption of information goods and services. The informatization of society is inextricably linked with the emergence and development of the market for information products and services, which is a system of economic, legal and organizational relations in the field of free purchase and sale of intellectual labor goods and services between various business entities and consumers. This market, like other markets, is characterized by a certain range of products and services, conditions and mechanisms for their provision, prices. The characteristic features of market relations are: the presence of competition, free choice of partners, mutual agreements of the exchanging parties, equivalent exchange of goods and funds, etc., which provides an opportunity for an effective solution to socio-economic problems. Information products act as goods of intellectual labor in this market: knowledge, documents, information systems, information technology, licenses, patents, trademarks, know-how, engineering and technical services, various kinds of information and other types of information resources. The information resource market functions similarly to traditional markets, but under the influence of its characteristics, elements of novelty appear in the process of forming demand, supply and pricing for an information product.


2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-175
Author(s):  
P. van Bommel ◽  
B. van Gils ◽  
H.A. Proper ◽  
M. van Vliet ◽  
Th.P. van der Weide
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
A. Humenchuk

The purpose of the article is to explore the experience and to identify the best practices for modernizing the content and organizational structure of multilevel training of librarians in China. The methodology. The study has used a systematic approach, which allowed to consider all components of the Chinese higher education in the specialties “Library, Archive and Information Science”, to establish the continuity of educational levels of librarians, to find out the factors determining the training system’s modernization. There was carried out comparative and content analysis of the Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctoral higher education levels educational programs, implemented by Chinese universities in the specialty “Library Science”, “Information Management and Information Systems”. This allowed to determine the general and the specifics of the Information Field Science training in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), to establish interdisciplinarity educational components, to substantiate the objective strengthening of the information component in the content of higher education in library science. The results. The article has looked into the content and structure of 227 different levels educational programs (EP) of the information specialists training, with 41% of them being the Bachelor’s level EP, 49% — Master’s, and 9% — Educational-Scientific Programs (ESP) for the Doctor of Management degree (an equivalent to the Doctor of Philosophy) in Information Sciences, provided in 108 universities in China. There were clarified the EP peculiarities: about 40% of them are programs dedicated to Information Management and Information Systems (Program in Information Management & Information Systems); 35% — EP in Library Science (Program in Library Science); 31.5% — EP in Archive Science (Program in Archive Science). In terms of content, most EPs are interdisciplinary, which is due to the national information infrastructure digitalization and the focus of its components to support the basic technological processes of the information management life cycle. It is established that Chinese universities adhere to the IFLA Guidelines for Professional Library and Information Science (LIS) Educational Programs. The scientific topicality. It is substantiated that in the digital information market the content of modern librarian training should be updated with such relevant interdisciplinary educational components as: “Principles of competitive intelligence and artificial intelligence”, “Electronic library and consolidated information management”, “Intelligent control systems”, “Information security systems”, “Economics of Management and Information Industry”, “Methods of data mining”, “Knowledge extraction and management”, “Analysis and design of information systems”. The practical significance. Ukrainian institutions of higher education when improving educational programs in the can use the study results. Addressing to the best foreign practices of the library specialists training will allow increasing their competitiveness in the world information market and promoting better efficiency of the Ukrainian libraries work in the conditions of the society digitalization.


Author(s):  
Bill Angus

This chapter argues that Ben Jonson’s The Staple of News presents a dystopic fantasy of control over information-gathering in which the news produced, though authorised by the eponymous Staple’s monopoly, is only as reliable as street gossip. The Staple’s sources are not ‘journalists’ in the modern sense; rather they are common informers, entirely lacking the ambivalence of Shakespeare’s magical agents. In this case, their information is publicly marketable, and thus, the play’s metadrama explores how Jonson negotiates not only the price of information, and artistic legitimacy, but ultimately authority itself. With its concealed observers, its predatory imagery, and the augmentative nature of its gathered information, this play describes the familiar conditions of both early modern informing practice and contemporary dramatic authorship, and, as ever, the deficiency of an audience’s interpretation is of prevailing concern. The chapter also suggests that Jonson’s metadrama functions as a tool of self-fashioning which only works in a market where the price of information, artistic freedom, and the legitimacy of authority, are negotiable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document