A search for correlates of intra-individual response variability.

1959 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter J. Raine ◽  
John R. Hills
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martín–Guillaumes J ◽  
◽  
Montull L ◽  
Ventura JL ◽  
Javierre C ◽  
...  

Purpose: To compare inter–individual response variability and detraining effects on markers attributed to aerobic and anaerobic performance after shortterm standardized aerobic, strength and mixed training programs. Methods: Thirty–six male students were randomly assigned to either an aerobic, strength, mixed, or control program (9 per group). They performed two consecutive cycling tests (incremental and plateau) to exhaustion at three points: 1 week before training, after 6 weeks of training, and 3 weeks after the training was finished. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), maximal workload (Wmax), and time to exhaustion performed at Wmax (W × time) were compared between groups by repeated–measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post–hoc tests. The inter–subject response variability within each training group was evaluated by comparison with the 95% confidence interval of the control group. Detraining effects were evaluated using the hysteresis areas, which were compared between each training group and the control group by Mann–Whitney U test. Results: Differences were observed in Wmax for the aerobic (F(2,7)=19.562; p=0.001; n²=0.85) and mixed (F(2,7)=13.447; p=0.004; n²=0.99) programs, and in W × time for the mixed program (F(2,7)=15.432; p= 0.016; n²=0.89). There was high inter–subject response variability for all variables and training programs, except for a homogenous positive response to Wmax in the mixed program (X²=6.27; p=0.04). Detraining effects of Wmax were also better maintained after the mixed program. Conclusion: A mixed program of aerobic and strength training demonstrated higher improvements in the studied markers of performance, with lower interindividual response variability, and longer detraining effects compared with aerobic or strength programs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary J. Williams ◽  
Michelle D. Failla ◽  
Samona L. Davis ◽  
Brynna H. Heflin ◽  
Christian D. Okitondo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Weidong Cai ◽  
Stacie L. Warren ◽  
Katherine Duberg ◽  
Bruce Pennington ◽  
Stephen P. Hinshaw ◽  
...  

AbstractChildren with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) have prominent deficits in sustained attention that manifest as elevated intra-individual response variability and poor decision-making. Influential neurocognitive models have linked attentional fluctuations to aberrant brain dynamics, but these models have not been tested with computationally rigorous procedures. Here we use a Research Domain Criteria approach, drift-diffusion modeling of behavior, and a novel Bayesian Switching Dynamic System unsupervised learning algorithm, with ultrafast temporal resolution (490 ms) whole-brain task-fMRI data, to investigate latent brain state dynamics of salience, frontoparietal, and default mode networks and their relation to response variability, latent decision-making processes, and inattention. Our analyses revealed that occurrence of a task-optimal latent brain state predicted decreased intra-individual response variability and increased evidence accumulation related to decision-making. In contrast, occurrence and dwell time of a non-optimal latent brain state predicted inattention symptoms and furthermore, in a categorical analysis, distinguished children with ADHD from controls. Importantly, functional connectivity between salience and frontoparietal networks predicted rate of evidence accumulation to a decision threshold, whereas functional connectivity between salience and default mode networks predicted inattention. Taken together, our computational modeling reveals dissociable latent brain state features underlying response variability, impaired decision-making, and inattentional symptoms common to ADHD. Our findings provide novel insights into the neurobiology of attention deficits in children.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela Patricia Henríquez-Henríquez ◽  
Pablo Billeke ◽  
Hugo Henríquez ◽  
Francisco Javier Zamorano ◽  
Francisco Rothhammer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karamacoska Diana ◽  
Barry Robert ◽  
Steiner Genevieve

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (S9) ◽  
pp. 3-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Cutler ◽  
Sara Ball ◽  
Stephen M. Stahl

The task of prescribing, dosing, and switching antipsychotics is generally characterized by a process of trial and error, often resulting in suffering from side effects and/or lack of response while searching for the optimum treatment. Clinical trials often inaccurately predict optimum doses and titration schedules, leaving prescribers without precise guidance for how to use newer therapies in clinical practice. A tremendous amount of individual response variability further complicates the task of effectively dosing antipsychotics.


1955 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Fiske ◽  
Laura Rice

NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 216 ◽  
pp. 116571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A.W. Bolton ◽  
Lorena G.A. Freitas ◽  
Delphine Jochaut ◽  
Anne-Lise Giraud ◽  
Dimitri Van De Ville

Neuroscience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 443 ◽  
pp. 120-130
Author(s):  
Antonio Luque-Casado ◽  
Rocío Rodríguez-Freiría ◽  
Noa Fogelson ◽  
Eliseo Iglesias-Soler ◽  
Miguel Fernández-del-Olmo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document