“Revisiting Carroll’s Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies: Implications for the Clinical Assessment of Intelligence”: Correction to Benson et al. (2018).

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1038-1038
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Factor Analytic ◽  
Assessment Of Intelligence

Revisiting Carroll’s survey of factor-analytic studies: Implications for the clinical assessment of intelligence.

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1028-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas F. Benson ◽  
A. Alexander Beaujean ◽  
Ryan J. McGill ◽  
Stefan C. Dombrowski
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Factor Analytic ◽  
Assessment Of Intelligence

Use of translated and adapted versions of the WISC-V: Caveat emptor

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. McGill ◽  
Thomas J. Ward ◽  
Gary L. Canivez
Keyword(s):  
Present Article ◽  
School Psychologists ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Empirical Data ◽  
Intelligence Test ◽  
Caveat Emptor ◽  
Intelligence Scale ◽  
The World ◽  
Assessment Of Intelligence

The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) is the most widely used intelligence test in the world. Now in its fifth edition, the WISC-V has been translated and adapted for use in nearly a dozen countries. Despite its popularity, numerous concerns have been raised about some of the procedures used to develop and validate translated and adapted versions of the test around the world. The purpose of this article is to survey the most salient of those methodological and statistical limitations. In particular, empirical data are presented that call into question the equating procedures used to validate the WISC-V Spanish, suggesting cautious use of that instrument. It is believed that the issues raised in the present article will be instructive for school psychologists engaged in the clinical assessment of intelligence with the WISC-V Spanish and with other translated and adapted versions around the world.

597: How Accurate is the Clinical Assessment of the Inguinal Region in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 193-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hadway ◽  
Cathy M. Corbishley ◽  
Matthew Perry ◽  
Nicholas A. Watkin
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Inguinal Region

205: Diagnosing Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome: A Correlation of Clinical Assessment, Validated Questionnaire, and Uroflow/EMG Patterns

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 54-54
Author(s):  
Christina Kim ◽  
Steven G. Docimo ◽  
Kathleen McKay ◽  
Paige Corral ◽  
Judith Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Emg Patterns

Factor-Analytic Scales of a Normative Form of the EPPS

1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Sherman ◽  
Charles A. Poe
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analytic

Intraindividual Variability in Development Within and Between Individuals

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Nesselroade
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Intraindividual Variability ◽  
Factor Analytic

A focus on the study of development and other kinds of changes in the whole individual has been one of the hallmarks of research by Magnusson and his colleagues. A number of different approaches emphasize this individual focus in their respective ways. This presentation focuses on intraindividual variability stemming from Cattell's P-technique factor analytic proposals, making several refinements to make it more tractable from a research design standpoint and more appropriate from a statistical analysis perspective. The associated methods make it possible to study intraindividual variability both within and between individuals. An empirical example is used to illustrate the procedure.

Psychometric Definition of Rorschach Determinant Component Structure

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond M. Costello
Keyword(s):  
Lower Order ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Comprehensive System ◽  
Empirical Examination ◽  
Component Structure ◽  
Exner's Comprehensive System ◽  
Factor Analytic ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Components Analysis ◽  
Definition Of

This is an empirical examination of Experienced Stimulation (es) and Experience Actual (EA) from Exner's Comprehensive System (CS) for Rorschach's Test, spurred by Kleiger's theoretical critique. Principal components analysis, Cronbach's α, and inter-item correlational analyses were used to test whether 13 determinants used to code Rorschach responses (M, FM, m, CF+C, YF+Y, C'F+C', TF+T, VF+V, FC, FC', FV, FY, FT) are best represented as a one, two, or more-dimensional construct. The 13 determinants appear to reflect three dimensions, a “lower order” sensori-motor dimension (m + CF+C + YF+Y + C'F+C' + TF+T + VF+V) with a suggested label of Modified Experienced Stimulation (MES), a “higher order” sensori-motor dimension (FM + FV + FY + FT) with a suggested label of Modified Experience Potential (MEP), and a third sensori-motor dimension (M+FC+FC') for which the label of Modified Experience Actual (MEA) is suggested. These findings are consistent with Kleiger's arguments and could lead to a refinement of CS constructs by aggregating determinants along lines more theoretically congruous and more internally consistent. A RAMONA model with parameters specified was presented for replication attempts which use confirmatory factor analytic techniques.

A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Study of Anxiety, Fear, and Behavioral Inhibition System Measures

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Cooper ◽  
Adam M. Perkins ◽  
Philip J. Corr
Keyword(s):  
Trait Anxiety ◽  
Behavioral Inhibition ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Behavioral Inhibition System ◽  
Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory ◽  
Factor Analytic ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Structural Invariance ◽  
Fear And Anxiety

Abstract. Recent revisions to the reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality have highlighted the distinction between the emotions of fear and anxiety. These revisions have substantial implications for self-report measurement; in particular, they raise the question of whether separate traits of fear and anxiety exist and, if so, their interrelationship. To address this question, the current study used confirmatory factor analytic procedures to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of measures of trait anxiety, fear, and the behavioral inhibition system (BIS). We also examined measurement and structural invariance across gender in 167 males and 173 females who completed the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Carver and White BIS Scale, and the Fear Survey Schedule (FSS). The findings suggested that trait anxiety and the BIS scale are relatively distinct from Tissue Damage Fear (FSS). Further, the final model showed measurement and structural invariance across gender. The implications of the results for future self-report assessment in RST research are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document