Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and fidelity of implementation on problem behavior in high schools.

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Flannery ◽  
P. Fenning ◽  
M. McGrath Kato ◽  
K. McIntosh
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Kathleen Lynne Lane

In recent years, there has been an increased research focus on developing tools to support the design, installation, and evaluation of tiered systems of support. In this special issue, we focus on research validating freely available tools to (a) measure fidelity of implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS), (b) assess staff commitment to implement SWPBIS, (c) inform development of teaching matrices, (d) examine issues of sustainability, and (e) assess school climate.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Massar ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer

Assessing fidelity of implementation of school-based interventions is a critical factor in successful implementation and sustainability. The Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) was developed as a comprehensive measure of all three tiers of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) and is intended to measure the extent to which the core features of SWPBIS are implemented with fidelity. The purpose of this study was to assess the extent to which the TFI can be used as one measure of all three tiers, three separate measures of individual tiers, or as a more granular level of fidelity that measures implementation on 10 subscales across the tiers. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to validate the factor structure of the TFI. Results indicate that the TFI is a valid measure of fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS and can be used to measure implementation by subscales, tiers, and as a comprehensive assessment of all three tiers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerin Kim ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Rhonda N. T. Nese

The purpose of this study was to examine associations between implementation fidelity of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) and student outcomes over time. The sample included 477 K–12 schools across 10 states implementing SWPBIS for varying numbers of years and at varying levels of fidelity (but with 78% of schools at or above established fidelity criteria). Results indicate that, in general, schools showed a decline in office discipline referrals (ODRs) and out-of-school suspensions (OSSs) over 3 years. SWPBIS fidelity of implementation was positively associated with initial levels of ODRs and OSSs, and the relations between fidelity and OSSs varied based on years of SWPBIS implementation. Levels of fidelity did not predict change in ODRs or OSSs. Despite no statistically significant associations between fidelity and student academic outcomes, schools that had implemented SWPBIS for 3 years or more had higher achievement in mathematics after controlling for prior achievement.


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Michelle M. Massar ◽  
Robert F. Algozzine ◽  
Heather Peshak George ◽  
Robert H. Horner ◽  
...  

Full and durable implementation of school-based interventions is supported by regular evaluation of fidelity of implementation. Multiple assessments have been developed to evaluate the extent to which schools are applying the core features of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). The SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) was developed to be used as an initial assessment to determine the extent to which a school is using (or needs) SWPBIS, a measure of SWPBIS fidelity of implementation at all three tiers of support, and a tool to guide action planning for further implementation efforts. In this research, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the TFI in three studies: a content validity study, a usability and reliability study, and a large-scale validation study. Results showed strong construct validity for assessing fidelity at all three tiers, strong interrater and 2-week test–retest reliability, high usability for action planning, and strong relations with existing SWPBIS fidelity measures. Implications for accurate evaluation planning are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Caitlin Rasplica Khoury ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton

Fidelity of implementation of school practices is crucial to student outcomes. Several types of tools, including self-assessments, are available for measuring fidelity, but little is known regarding the relation of self-assessments of fidelity to fidelity instruments completed with the support of external experts, specifically, during the first few years of implementation. The present study used cross-sectional data from 1,438 schools to examine relations between fidelity self-assessment and team-based fidelity measures in the first 4 years of implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS). Results showed strong positive correlations between fidelity self-assessments and a team-based measure of fidelity at each year of implementation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eoin Bastable ◽  
Michelle M. Massar ◽  
Kent McIntosh

Coaching is an important component in multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) such as school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS), but little is known about which coaching activities are most related to sustained implementation of this school-wide framework. A survey was developed to examine the amount of receipt and perceived importance of coaching activities delivered to SWPBIS school teams. Respondents included SWPBIS team members ( n = 264) implementing Tier 1 SWPBIS for at least 3 years in 138 districts across nine states. Partial correlations were conducted on a subsample of schools ( n = 131) using the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) to assess self-reported implementation fidelity to examine the extent to which each coaching activity was associated with fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS. Results indicated Assisting With Team Action Planning, Assisting With Data Collection, and Sharing Knowledge of SWPBIS Systems were perceived as most important to SWPBIS sustainability. Partial correlations showed two activities were statistically significant and positively correlated with SWPBIS fidelity of implementation: Running Data Reports for the Team and Modeling SWPBIS Implementation. Implications for assessing and differentiating coaching supports delivered to schools are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Keller-Bell ◽  
Maureen Short

Purpose Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) provide a framework for behavioral expectations in school systems for children with and without disabilities. Speech-language pathologists who work in school settings should be familiar with this framework as part of their role in improving the outcomes for children. The purpose of this tutorial is to discuss PBIS and its use in school settings. Method The authors provide an overview of the PBIS framework and focus on its applicability in classroom-based settings. The process of implementing PBIS in classrooms and other settings such as speech-language therapy is discussed. Conclusions This tutorial provides speech-language pathologists with an overview of PBIS and may facilitate their understanding of how to implement PBIS in nonclassroom settings.


2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072199608
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine patterns in implementation of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) systems to identify timings of installation that led to higher implementation of advanced tiers. Extant data from 776 schools in 27 states reporting on the first 3 years of Tier 2 implementation and 359 schools in 23 states reporting on the first year of Tier 3 implementation were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found that higher Tier 1 implementation predicted subsequent Tier 2 and Tier 3 implementation. In addition, waiting 2 or 3 years after initial Tier 1 implementation to launch Tier 2 systems predicted higher initial Tier 2 implementation (compared with implementing the next year). Finally, we found that launching Tier 3 systems after Tier 2 systems, compared with launching both tiers simultaneously, predicted higher Tier 2 implementation in the second and third year, so long as Tier 3 systems were launched within 3 years of Tier 2 systems. These findings provide empirical guidance for when to launch Tier 2 and 3 systems; however, we emphasize that delays in launching advanced systems should not equate to delays in more intensive supports for students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document