Careless Response Measure

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam W. Meade ◽  
S. Bartholomew Craig
Keyword(s):  
Response Measure

Persistence–Licensing Response Measure

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael Zemack-Rugar ◽  
Canan Corus ◽  
David Brinberg
Keyword(s):  
Response Measure

Interaction of Number of Training Trials and Specific Response Measure in Determining Effects of Magnitude of Reward

1982 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 727-733
Author(s):  
Stephen F. Davis ◽  
Walter C. Janzen ◽  
John D. Seago
Keyword(s):  
Instrumental Response ◽  
Specific Response ◽  
Response Measure ◽  
The Relationship

Two experiments examined the relationship between number of training trials in a runway, various segments of the instrumental response, and effects of magnitude of reward. In each, separate groups of rats received 120 training trials with large and small rewards, respectively. Results of both experiments indicated that significant effects of magnitude were established and persisted in the start and run measures. Transitory effects of magnitude were shown in the goal measures of both experiments.

Spoken language comprehension: insights from eye movements

2007 ◽  
pp. 308-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Tanenhaus
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Language Comprehension ◽  
Language Production ◽  
World Literature ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Response Measure ◽  
Visual World ◽  
Spoken Language Processing ◽  
Spoken Language Comprehension

Recently, eye movements have become a widely used response measure for studying spoken language processing in both adults and children, in situations where participants comprehend and generate utterances about a circumscribed “Visual World” while fixation is monitored, typically using a free-view eye-tracker. Psycholinguists now use the Visual World eye-movement method to study both language production and language comprehension, in studies that run the gamut of current topics in language processing. Eye movements are a response measure of choice for addressing many classic questions about spoken language processing in psycholinguistics. This article reviews the burgeoning Visual World literature on language comprehension, highlighting some of the seminal studies and examining how the Visual World approach has contributed new insights to our understanding of spoken word recognition, parsing, reference resolution, and interactive conversation. It considers some of the methodological issues that come to the fore when psycholinguists use eye movements to examine spoken language comprehension.

Autokinetic Word Writing as a Function of Variations in Instructions

1969 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 743-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen M. Vaught
Keyword(s):  
Word Production ◽  
Response Measure ◽  
Word Writing

An attempt was made to determine whether or not variation in autokinetic word writing (AWT) instructions would increase word production. Normative characteristics of 99 Ss' word productions are presented. It was generally concluded that, while increased word production does result from different instructions, the reliability of this response measure remains questionable.

A Note on Selecting a Response Measure for Financial Distress

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 869-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry J. Ward ◽  
Benjamin P. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Response Measure

The Sensitivity of Response Measures of Alphanumeric Legibility to Variations in Dot Matrix Display Parameters

1979 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
HARRY L. SNYDER
Keyword(s):  
Correct Response ◽  
Recognition Accuracy ◽  
Variable Parameter ◽  
Viewing Distance ◽  
Response Measure ◽  
Percent Correct Response ◽  
Percent Correct ◽  
Character Size ◽  
Response Measures ◽  
Tachistoscopic Recognition

This research evaluated the sensitivity of four observer response measures to variations in the character size and dot luminance of a dot matrix display. Specifically, the research determined the sensitivity of recognition accuracy, response time, tachistoscopic recognition accuracy, and threshold visibility. Alphanumeric characters were presented to six subjects in noncontextual form on a variable-parameter CRT display programmed and driven by a minicomputer. Recognition accuracy (percent correct response) was found to be the response measure that is most sensitive to the display parameters of character size and dot luminance. Character size, dot luminance, and viewing distance proved to have consistent and significant effects at viewing distances greater than 1.52 m. At lesser viewing distances, these parameters had little effect. The results suggest that there is no major difference between the display requirements for computer-generated dot matrix displays versus those for conventional CRT displays.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document