Feeling Scale

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Jack Rejeski ◽  
Deborah L. Best ◽  
Parks Griffith ◽  
Elizabeth Kenney
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Domingues Alves ◽  
Valéria Leme Gonçalves Panissa ◽  
Bruno José Barros ◽  
Emerson Franchini ◽  
Monica Yuri Takito

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-225
Author(s):  
Bruno Marcello Rodrigues dos Santos ◽  
Loumaíra Carvalho da Cruz ◽  
Alfredo Anderson Teixeira-Araujo ◽  
Thaise Camila Oliveira Gomes Rocha ◽  
Karoline Teixeira Passos de Andrade ◽  
...  

O objetivo primário do estudo foi analisar as respostas de glicose (GLIC) e secundariamente o comportamento da percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) e domínio afetivo durante exercício resistido (ER) de diferentes intensidades em mulheres com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2). Oito mulheres com DM2 foram submetidas a sessões randomizadas, sendo: a) Dia 1 – Controle (CON40 ou CON80) e b) Dia 2 – ER (ER40 ou ER80), realizado em três circuitos de sete exercícios cada, durante um período de 40 minutos. Foram avaliados: GLIC, PSE, feeling scale (FS) e Felt Arousal Scale (FAS). A GLIC reduziu significativamente para ER40 (140,0 ± 19,1 mg.dL-1) quando comparado ao repouso (228,3 ± 16,6 mg.dL-1), CON40 (241,3 ± 53,2 mg.dL-1), CON80 (220,9 ± 67,9 mg.dL-1) e ER80 (212,2 ± 70,9 mg.dL-1) na média geral da sessão (P<0,001) e a cada 5 minutos (P<0,001). Para FS e FAS não ocorreu efeito principal do tempo e nem diferenças entre sessões (P>0,05). Diferença significativa ocorreu na PSE entre sessões (ER40: 11,4 ± 1,2 pts vs. ER80: 12,9 ± 1,5 pts; P<0,05). A sessão ER40 promoveu maior redução da GLIC e, apesar de diferir na PSE, ambas intensidades de ER mantiveram os resultados de FS e FAS.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Blair Evans ◽  
Sharleen D. Hoar ◽  
Robert J. Gebotys ◽  
Courtney A. Marchesin

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1219-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achraf Ammar ◽  
Stephen J. Bailey ◽  
Omar Hammouda ◽  
Khaled Trabelsi ◽  
Nabil Merzigui ◽  
...  

Purpose: The effect of playing surface on physical performance during a repeated-sprint ability (RSA) test and the mechanisms for any potential playing-surface-dependent effects on RSA performance are equivocal. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of natural grass (NG) and artificial turf (AT) on physical performance, ratings of perceived exertion, feeling scale, and blood biomarkers related to anaerobic contribution (blood lactate [Lac]), muscle damage (creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase), inflammation (C-reactive protein), and immune function (neutrophils [NEU], lymphocytes [LYM], and monocytes) in response to an RSA test. Methods: A total of 9 male professional football players from the same regional team completed 2 sessions of RSA testing (6 × 30 s interspersed with a 35-s recovery) on NG and AT in a randomized order. During the RSA test, total (sum of distances) and peak (highest distance covered in a single repetition) distance covered were determined using a measuring tape, and the decrement in sprinting performance from the first to the last repetition was calculated. Before and after the RSA test, ratings of perceived exertion, feeling scale, and Lac, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, NEU, LYM, and monocytes were recorded in both NG and AT conditions. Results: Although physical performance declined during the RSA blocks on both surfaces (P = .001), the distance covered declined more on NG (15%) than on AT (11%; P = .04; effect size [ES] = −0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.21 to 0.56) with a higher total distance covered (+6% [2%]) on AT (P = .018; ES = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.16 to 2.04). In addition, lower ratings of perceived exertion (P = .04; ES = −0.49; 95% CI, −1.36 to 0.42), Lac, NEU, and LYM (P = .03; ES = −0.80; 95% CI, −1.67 to 0.14; ES = −0.16; 95% CI, −1.03 to 0.72; and ES = −0.94; 95% CI, −1.82 to 0.02, respectively) and more positive feelings (P = .02; ES = 0.81; 95% CI, −0.13 to 1.69) were observed after the RSA test performed on AT than on NG. No differences were observed in the remaining physical and blood markers. Conclusion: These findings suggest that RSA performance is enhanced on AT compared with NG. This effect was accompanied by lower fatigue perception and Lac, NEU, and LYM and a more pleasurable feeling. These observations might have implications for physical performance in intermittent team-sport athletes who train and compete on different playing surfaces.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-225
Author(s):  
Bruno Marcello Rodrigues dos Santos ◽  
Loumaíra Carvalho da Cruz ◽  
Alfredo Anderson Teixeira-Araujo ◽  
Thaise Camila Oliveira Gomes Rocha ◽  
Karoline Teixeira Passos de Andrade ◽  
...  

O objetivo primário do estudo foi analisar as respostas de glicose (GLIC) e secundariamente o comportamento da percepção subjetiva de esforço (PSE) e domínio afetivo durante exercício resistido (ER) de diferentes intensidades em mulheres com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2). Oito mulheres com DM2 foram submetidas a sessões randomizadas, sendo: a) Dia 1 – Controle (CON40 ou CON80) e b) Dia 2 – ER (ER40 ou ER80), realizado em três circuitos de sete exercícios cada, durante um período de 40 minutos. Foram avaliados: GLIC, PSE, feeling scale (FS) e Felt Arousal Scale (FAS). A GLIC reduziu significativamente para ER40 (140,0 ± 19,1 mg.dL-1) quando comparado ao repouso (228,3 ± 16,6 mg.dL-1), CON40 (241,3 ± 53,2 mg.dL-1), CON80 (220,9 ± 67,9 mg.dL-1) e ER80 (212,2 ± 70,9 mg.dL-1) na média geral da sessão (P<0,001) e a cada 5 minutos (P<0,001). Para FS e FAS não ocorreu efeito principal do tempo e nem diferenças entre sessões (P>0,05). Diferença significativa ocorreu na PSE entre sessões (ER40: 11,4 ± 1,2 pts vs. ER80: 12,9 ± 1,5 pts; P<0,05). A sessão ER40 promoveu maior redução da GLIC e, apesar de diferir na PSE, ambas intensidades de ER mantiveram os resultados de FS e FAS.


2010 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 561-562
Author(s):  
Walter R. Bixby ◽  
Eric E. Hall ◽  
Paul C. Miller

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1852-1860 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELAINE A. ROSE ◽  
GAYNOR PARFITT

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Emilee Traxler ◽  
Robert W. Pettitt ◽  
Mark Hartmann ◽  
Cherie D. Pettitt

1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 1011-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Carskadon

Test-retest reliabilities of continuous scores on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator scales were examined for 64 male and 70 female college students, using an 8-wk. test-retest interval. Reliabilities were generally satisfactory ( rs ranging from .73 to .87) with the exception of scores for males on the Thinking-Feeling scale ( r = .56).


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aviv Emanuel ◽  
Itzhak Rozen Smukas ◽  
Israel Halperin

Purpose: The feeling scale (FS) is a unique and underexplored scale in sport sciences that measures affective valence. FS has the potential to be used in athletic environments as a monitoring and prescription tool. We sought to examine whether FS ratings, as measured on a repetition-by-repetition basis, can predict proximity to task-failure and bar velocity across different exercises and loads. Methods: On the first day, 20 trained subjects (10 females) completed 1RM tests in the barbell bench and squat exercises and were introduced to the FS. On the following three sessions, subjects completed three sets to task-failure with either 1) 70%1RM bench-press, 2) 70%1RM squat (squat-70%), or 3) 80%1RM squat (squat-80%). Sessions were completed in a randomized, counter-balanced order. After every completed repetition, subjects verbally reported their FS ratings. Bar velocity was measured via linear position transducer. Results: FS ratings predicted failure-proximity and bar velocity in all three conditions (p&lt;0.001, R2 range: 0.66-0.85). Specifically, a reduction of one unit in the FS corresponded to approaching task-failure by 14%, 11% and 11%, and to a reduction in bar velocity of 10%, 4% and 3%, in the bench, squat-70% and squat-80%, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate if the FS can be used in RT environments among trained subjects, on a repetition-by-repetition basis. The results show strong predictive abilities of the FS, indicating that the scale can be used to monitor and prescribe resistance training, and that its benefits should be further explored.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document