scholarly journals Tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in monitoring palliative treatment response of patients with gastrointestinal tumours

1995 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Kornek ◽  
T Schenk ◽  
M Raderer ◽  
M Djavarnmad ◽  
W Scheithauer
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. e574-e574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison H. Feibus ◽  
Jeffrey R. Guccione ◽  
Ashwin Vasudevamurthy ◽  
Elisa M. Ledet ◽  
Patrick Cotogno ◽  
...  

e574 Background: Abiraterone (Abi) and enzaleutamide (Enza) are first-line agents for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Primary resistance is well-documented, but little data exists for rapid treatment responders. This study intended to further characterize patients with early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed on 123 mCRPC patients treated with Abi and/or Enza. PSA was recorded every 4 weeks for the duration of treatment. The primary endpoint was to describe PSA response, including sensitivities and specificities, as a predictor of later treatment response (defined as ≥50% decrease in PSA from baseline). Additional clinical covariates were also evaluated as treatment-response predictors. Results: A PSA response to Abi was achieved in 52/123 (42%) of patients. Median time to PSA nadir was 37 days. 30/52 (58%) patients responded to the drug within 4 weeks. Median length of time on drug was 110 days. A PSA response to Enza was achieved in 21/123 (17%) of patients. Median time to PSA nadir was 140 days. 18/21 (86%) of patients responded to the drug within 4 weeks. Median length of time on drug was 161 days. Conclusions: Percentage of PSA decline and time to drug response for Enza and Abi are important variables that can serve as reliable way for clinicians to predict long-term PSA response. It is vital to make appropriate treatment modifications for patients that do not display early PSA response. [Table: see text]


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 304
Author(s):  
Brian Malling ◽  
Martin Andreas Røder ◽  
Carsten Lauridsen ◽  
Lars Lönn

Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is an emerging therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Optimal patient selection is an important step when introducing new treatments and several characteristics associated with a good clinical outcome has previously been proposed. However, no prognostic tool is yet available for PAE. Computed tomography perfusion is an imaging technique that provides hemodynamic parameters making it possible to estimate the prostatic blood flow (PBF). This study investigated the relationship between PBF and the response to PAE. A post hoc analysis including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements before and 24-h after embolization from two prospective studies on sixteen patients undergoing PAE with BPH or prostate cancer were performed. The primary outcome was the correlation between baseline PBF and the change in PSA as a surrogate measure of treatment response. Prostate volume strongly correlated with treatment response and the response was greater with incremental amounts of injected embolic material. PBF was not associated with elevation in PSA and added no information that could guide patient selection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5079-5079
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Matthew Raymond Smith ◽  
Teuvo Tammela ◽  
Christopher Michael Pieczonka ◽  
...  

5079 Background: Patients (pts) with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) need therapy that prolongs survival with little added toxicity, thus preserving quality of life. The second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) including DARO, apalutamide, and enzalutamide offer durable survival in nmCRPC but differences exist in AE profiles (eg, fatigue, falls, fractures, rash, mental impairment, and hypertension) that can limit daily activities. These AEs may require dose modifications and limit pts’ willingness to continue treatment, with an adverse impact on efficacy. DARO is a structurally distinct ARI that significantly extended metastasis-free survival and overall survival (OS) vs placebo (PBO) in ARAMIS (NCT02200614), with minimal AE risk. We report tolerability from extended follow-up and treatment response analyses from ARAMIS. Methods: Pts with nmCRPC (N=1509) were randomized 2:1 to DARO or PBO with androgen deprivation therapy. The ARAMIS trial was unblinded at the primary analysis, after which all pts could receive open-label (OL) DARO. Tolerability was assessed every 16 weeks. Pharmacodynamic modeling investigated the association between treatment response (maximum prostate-specific antigen [PSA] decline from baseline) and OS at 2 years using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: As shown in the table, DARO remained well tolerated over the double-blind (DB) and OL periods: 98.8% of pts on DARO received the full planned dose and almost all pts with dose modifications were able to resume and re-establish the planned dose (DARO 89.6% vs PBO 89.7%). Discontinuation of DARO due to AEs increased slightly from the DB period (9.0%) to the DB+OL period (10.5%). Pharmacodynamic modeling showed that longer OS was positively associated with maximum PSA decline in DARO-treated pts. Conclusions: DARO remained well tolerated with extended treatment at the recommended dose of 600 mg twice daily. Almost all pts with nmCRPC were able to receive the full planned dose, increasing the likelihood of clinical benefit from effective disease control (PSA decline) and prolonged survival. Tolerability of different ARIs in the real world should be assessed. Clinical trial information: NCT02200614. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS275-TPS275
Author(s):  
Yazan Numan ◽  
Jonathan Zhao ◽  
Song Tang ◽  
Youbin Zhang ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
...  

TPS275 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the backbone of therapy for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Despite a high response rate, the majority of patients progress to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Both disease settings are heterogeneous with variable responses to treatment. While prostate specific antigen is an important biomarker for prognosis and disease monitoring, it has limitations. Biomarkers predictive of disease response and progression are critically needed. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are shed from tumors and are found in blood during advanced stages of disease. Serial characterization of CTCs serves as a real-time ‘liquid biopsy’ for molecular profiling of PC. Recent reports suggest that phenotypic & genomic heterogeneity in CTCs and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is associated with response to AR-targeted therapy highlighting the importance of CTC as a predictive biomarker. In addition, there is a high concordance between mutations in CTCs’ DNA and CRPC tissue through whole cell exome sequencing. We showed that atypical chemokine receptor CXCR7 is up-regulated following AR-targeted therapies, activating MAPK/ERK signaling and resulting in treatment resistance (Li et al., Cancer Res. 2019). To examine the potential of CXCR7/MAPK/ERK signaling in predicting treatment response, we propose to evaluate MAPK/ERK gene signature, pERK and AR level in CRPC or mHSPC patients receiving systemic therapy. Methods: Men with new CRPC or mHSPC are eligible prior to initiating new therapy for the respective disease setting of ADT + AR targeted therapy or chemotherapy. For CRPC arm, we will collect samples at baseline, 3, 6 months & at time of progression. For mHSPC arm, samples are collected at baseline, after 7 months & at progression. We will enroll 120 patients. Collected samples are subjected to identification, isolation, and enumeration of CTCs. Our primary molecular testing will include AR and pERK staining. CfDNA exome and methylome analysis will be performed to evaluate genomic heterogeneity and epigenomic alterations. We will explore pairwise association among biomarkers of interest, stratified by subgroups, using measures of association.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (31) ◽  
pp. 3662-3671
Author(s):  
Christos E. Kyriakopoulos ◽  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
Anna Ferrari ◽  
Jamie M. Sperger ◽  
Anupama Singh ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Intrapatient treatment response heterogeneity is under-recognized. Quantitative total bone imaging (QTBI) using 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans is a tool that allows characterization of interlesional treatment response heterogeneity in bone. Understanding spatial-temporal response is important to identify individuals who may benefit from treatment beyond progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with at least two lesions on bone scintigraphy were enrolled and treated with enzalutamide 160 mg daily (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02384382 ). 18F-NaF PET/CT scans were obtained at baseline (PET1), week 13 (PET2), and at the time of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, standard radiographic or clinical progression, or at 2 years without progression (PET3). QTBI was used to determine lesion-level response. The primary end point was the proportion of men with at least one responding bone lesion on PET3 using QTBI. RESULTS Twenty-three men were enrolled. Duration on treatment ranged from 1.4 to 34.1 months. In general, global standardized uptake value (SUV) metrics decreased while on enzalutamide (PET2) and increased at the time of progression (PET3). The most robust predictor of PSA progression was change in SUVhetero (PET1 to PET3; hazard ratio, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.24 to 12.1). Although overall functional disease burden improved during enzalutamide treatment, an increase in total burden (SUVtotal) was seen at the time of progression, as measured by 18F-NaF PET/CT. All (22/22) evaluable men had at least one responding bone lesion at PET3 using QTBI. CONCLUSION We found that the proportion of progressing lesions was low, indicating that a substantial number of lesions appear to continue to benefit from enzalutamide beyond progression. Selective targeting of nonresponding lesions may be a reasonable approach to extend benefit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document