scholarly journals Haploinsufficiency of the MYT1L gene causes intellectual disability frequently associated with behavioral disorder

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 683-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Mayo ◽  
Mónica Roselló ◽  
Sandra Monfort ◽  
Silvestre Oltra ◽  
Carmen Orellana ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Evan Jiang ◽  
Mark P. Fitzgerald ◽  
Katherine L. Helbig ◽  
Ethan M. Goldberg

AbstractInterleukin-1 receptor accessory protein-like 1 (IL1RAPL1) encodes a protein that is highly expressed in neurons and has been shown to regulate neurite outgrowth as well as synapse formation and synaptic transmission. Clinically, mutations in or deletions of IL1RAPL1 have been associated with a spectrum of neurological dysfunction including autism spectrum disorder and nonsyndromic X-linked developmental delay/intellectual disability of varying severity. Nearly all reported cases are in males; in the few reported cases involving females, the clinical presentation was mild or the deletion was identified in phenotypically normal carriers in accordance with X-linked inheritance. Using genome-wide microarray analysis, we identified a novel de novo 373 kb interstitial deletion of the X chromosome (Xp21.1-p21.2) that includes exons 4 to 6 of the IL1RAPL1 gene in an 8-year-old girl with severe intellectual disability and behavioral disorder with a history of developmental regression. Overnight continuous video electroencephalography revealed electrical status epilepticus in sleep (ESES). This case expands the clinical genetic spectrum of IL1RAPL1-related neurodevelopmental disorders and highlights a new genetic association of ESES.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Pandolfo ◽  
Myriam Rai ◽  
Gauthier Remiche ◽  
Laurence Desmyter ◽  
Isabelle Vandernoot

ObjectiveTo describe the clinical and molecular genetic findings in a family segregating a novel mutation in the AIFM1 gene on the X chromosome.MethodsWe studied the clinical features and performed brain MRI scans, nerve conduction studies, audiometry, cognitive testing, and clinical exome sequencing (CES) in the proband, his mother, and maternal uncle. We used in silico tools, X chromosome inactivation assessment, and Western blot analysis to predict the consequences of an AIFM1 variant identified by CES and demonstrate its pathogenicity.ResultsThe proband and his maternal uncle presented with childhood-onset nonprogressive cerebellar ataxia, hearing loss, intellectual disability (ID), peripheral neuropathy, and mood and behavioral disorder. The proband's mother had mild cerebellar ataxia, ID, and mood and behavior disorder, but no neuropathy or hearing loss. The 3 subjects shared a variant (c.1195G>A; p.Gly399Ser) in exon 12 of the AIFM1 gene, which is not reported in the exome/genome sequence databases, affecting a critical amino acid for protein function involved in NAD(H) binding and predicted to be pathogenic with very high probability by variant analysis programs. X chromosome inactivation was highly skewed in the proband's mother. The mutation did not cause quantitative changes in protein abundance.ConclusionsOur report extends the molecular and phenotypic spectrum of AIFM1 mutations. Specific findings include limited progression of neurologic abnormalities after the first decade and the coexistence of mood and behavior disorder. This family also shows the confounding effect on the phenotype of nongenetic factors, such as alcohol and drug use and side effects of medication.


Author(s):  
Ivona Vrkić Boban ◽  
Futoshi Sekiguchi ◽  
Mirela Lozić ◽  
Noriko Miyake ◽  
Naomichi Matsumoto ◽  
...  

AbstractBalanced chromosomal abnormalities (BCAs) can disrupt gene function resulting in disease. To date, BCA disrupting the SET binding protein 1 (SETBP1) gene has not been reported. On the other hand, de novo heterozygous variants in the highly conserved 11-bp region in SETBP1 can result in the Schinzel–Giedion syndrome. This condition is characterized by severe intellectual disability, a characteristic face, and multiple-system anomalies. Further other types of mutations involving SETBP1 are associated with a different phenotype, mental retardation, autosomal dominant 29 (MRD29), which has mild dysmorphic features, developmental delay, and behavioral disorders. Here we report a male patient who has moderate intellectual disability, mild behavioral difficulties, and severe expressive speech impairment resulting from a de novo balanced chromosome translocation, t(12;18)(q22;q12.3). By whole genome sequencing, we determined the breakpoints at the nucleotide level. The 18q12.3 breakpoint was located between exons 2 and 3 of SETBP1. Phenotypic features of our patient are compatible with those with MRD29. This is the first reported BCA disrupting SETBP1.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Kerr ◽  
Christine Linehan ◽  
Christian Brandt ◽  
Kousuke Kanemoto ◽  
Jun Kawasaki ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 594-602
Author(s):  
Carmela Scuderi ◽  
Lucia Saccuzzo ◽  
Mirella Vinci ◽  
Lucia Castiglia ◽  
Ornella Galesi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Mottron

Abstract Stepping away from a normocentric understanding of autism goes beyond questioning the supposed lack of social motivation of autistic people. It evokes subversion of the prevalence of intellectual disability even in non-verbal autism. It also challenges the perceived purposelessness of some restricted interests and repetitive behaviors, and instead interprets them as legitimate exploratory and learning-associated manifestations.


2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 666-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Robertson ◽  
E. Emerson ◽  
N. Gregory ◽  
C. Hatton ◽  
S. Kessissoglou ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Richard T. Katz

Abstract The author, who is the editor of the Mental and Behavioral Disorders chapter of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, comments on the previous article, Assessing Mental and Behavioral Disorder Impairment: Overview of Sixth Edition Approaches in this issue of The Guides Newsletter. The new Mental and Behavioral Disorders (M&BD) chapter, like others in the AMA Guides, is a consensus opinion of many authors and thus reflects diverse points of view. Psychiatrists and psychologists continue to struggle with diagnostic taxonomies within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, but anxiety, depression, and psychosis are three unequivocal areas of mental illness for which the sixth edition of the AMA Guides provides M&BD impairment rating. Two particular challenges faced the authors of the chapter: how could M&BD disorders be rated (and yet avoid an onslaught of attorney requests for an M&BD rating in conjunction with every physical impairment), and what should be the maximal impairment rating for a mental illness. The sixth edition uses three scales—the Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale, the Global Assessment of Function, and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale—after careful review of a wide variety of indices. The AMA Guides remains a work in progress, but the authors of the M&BD chapter have taken an important step toward providing a reasonable method for estimating impairment.


2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Norma Leclair ◽  
Steve Leclair ◽  
Robert Barth

Abstract Chapter 14, Mental and Behavioral Disorders, in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, defines a process for assessing permanent impairment, including providing numeric ratings, for persons with specific mental and behavioral disorders. These mental disorders are limited to mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and psychotic disorders, and this chapter focuses on the evaluation of brain functioning and its effects on behavior in the absence of evident traumatic or disease-related objective central nervous system damage. This article poses and answers questions about the sixth edition. For example, this is the first since the second edition (1984) that provides a numeric impairment rating, and this edition establishes a standard, uniform template to translate human trauma or disease into a percentage of whole person impairment. Persons who conduct independent mental and behavioral evaluation using this chapter should be trained in psychiatry or psychology; other users should be experienced in psychiatric or psychological evaluations and should have expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of mental and behavioral disorders. The critical first step in determining a mental or behavioral impairment rating is to document the existence of a definitive diagnosis based on the current edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The article also enumerates the psychiatric disorders that are considered ratable in the sixth edition, addresses use of the sixth edition during independent medical evaluations, and answers additional questions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document