scholarly journals Superconducting parity effect across the Anderson limit

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Vlaic ◽  
Stéphane Pons ◽  
Tianzhen Zhang ◽  
Alexandre Assouline ◽  
Alexandre Zimmers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 166 (8) ◽  
pp. 907
Author(s):  
J. Delft ◽  
D.S. Golubev ◽  
W. Tichy ◽  
A.D. Zaikin
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (01) ◽  
pp. 1450004 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHIGANG SONG ◽  
J.-Q. LIANG ◽  
L.-F. WEI

Analytic formulas of Bell correlations are derived in terms of quantum probability statistics under the assumption of measuring outcome-independence and the Bell's inequalities (BIs) are extended to general bipartite-entanglement macroscopic quantum-states (MQS) of arbitrary spins. For a spin-½ entangled state we find analytically that the violations of BIs really resulted from the quantum nonlocal correlations. However, the BIs are always satisfied for the spin-1 entangled MQS. More generally the quantum nonlocality does not lead to the violation for the integer spins since the nonlocal interference effects cancel each other by the quantum statistical-average. Such a cancellation no longer exists for the half-integer spins due to the nontrivial Berry phase, and thus the violation of BIs is understood remarkably as an effect of geometric phase. Specifically, our generic observation of the spin-parity effect can be experimentally tested with the entangled photon-pairs.


1994 ◽  
Vol 195 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 380-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.S. Golubev ◽  
A.D. Zaikin
Keyword(s):  

1966 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Lodge ◽  
F. W. H. Elsley ◽  
R. M. MacPherson

1. Twelve sets of 3 litter-sister Large White gilts were mated at first oestrus after reaching 250 lb. live-weight and given daily during 3 successive pregnancies either 6 lb. (A), 3 lb. (B) or 3 lb. for 76 days then 6 lb. until parturition (C) of the same meal mixture. During an 8-week lactation all were given 4 lb. meal plus 0·8 lb. per piglet suckled.2. There was a significant linear increase in numbers born with successive parities (P<0·05) but no significant differences between treatment or sister groups. There was a highly significant difference between treatment groups in mean piglet birth weight (P< 0·001) but no parity effect; mean birth weights were 2·76, 2·40 and 2·58 Ib. for Groups A, B and C respectively. Differences between sister groups in mean piglet birth weight were also significant (P<0·05).3. Post-natal litter performance was poor for all groups, probably because of the presence of E. coli, but there was no evidence of treatment effects other than on 3-week weight of third litters, which was significantly greater in Group C than in A or B (P<0·05). There were no significant effects on either number or weight of piglets at 8 weeks.


2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Holzberger ◽  
Tobias Schuh ◽  
Stefan Blügel ◽  
Samir Lounis ◽  
Wulf Wulfhekel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document