Liver steatosis and errors in estimation of standard liver volume

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 667-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Hashimoto ◽  
Masatoshi Makuuchi
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohide Yoneyama ◽  
Yoshihiko Fukukura ◽  
Kiyohisa Kamimura ◽  
Koji Takumi ◽  
Aya Umanodan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15175-e15175
Author(s):  
Angela Damato ◽  
Giulia Besutti ◽  
Candida Bonelli ◽  
Francesco Venturelli ◽  
Paolo Giorgi Rossi ◽  
...  

e15175 Background: Despite the combination of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy and long course radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) followed by TME, LARC still results in 30% distant recurrence within 2-3 years after surgery. One of the most affected organs is the liver. We aimed to analyze if basal liver pathological alterations and drug-induced liver damages influence the liver recurrence. Methods: 50 patients (pts) with LARC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) between June 2010 and June 2017 in a single center were included. Liver function tests (LFTs) including AST, ALT and GGT at baseline and after NACRT were evaluated. The first staging CT scan and, when available, post-NACRT CT scan were reviewed to assess steatosis (unenhanced liver density < 48 HU or liver-to-spleen ratio < 1.1), and liver volume. Associations of baseline LFTs and CT liver alterations and changes after NACRT with liver metastasis (LM) during follow-up were evaluated with Hazard Ratio (HR) and respective 95%CI calculated with Cox analysis. Results: The characteristics of pts were: 68% males, median age 60.4 ys (range 34-84), cTN stage II (32%) and stage III (64%). During a follow-up ranging from 1.5 to 7 ys, 17(34%) pts developed distant recurrence and 7(14%) LM. At baseline, 2 pts had GGT > 73 U/l and 11(22%) had steatosis. After NACRT, 4(9%) pts had AST > 40 U/I and/or ALT > 49 U/l with > 2-folds increase, 6 (40%) of the 15 pts with available unenhanced post-NACRT CT had steatosis development, or increase (≥10 HU density decrease), and 9 (27%) of 33 pts with available post-NACRT CT had a > 10% increase in liver volume. LM was associated with female sex (p = 0.016). Baseline steatosis, post-NACRT steatosis development or increase, > 10% liver volume and transaminase increase were associated with LM (HR = 3.36, 95%CI = 0.75-15.1; HR = 3.67, 95%CI = 0.33-40.7; HR = 2.91, 95%CI = 0.59-14.5; HR = 3.05, 95%CI = 0.33-27.72, respectively). All the reported associations almost disappeared, when considering all-sites of distant recurrence. Conclusions: Even if small numbers cannot exclude that associations are due to chance, baseline liver steatosis and post-NACRT liver damage may be involved in LM during follow-up of LARC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1113-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka Wing Ma ◽  
Kenneth S. H. Chok ◽  
Albert C. Y. Chan ◽  
Henry S. C. Tam ◽  
Wing Chiu Dai ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1437-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Chaminda Siriwardana ◽  
See Ching Chan ◽  
Kenneth Siu Ho Chok ◽  
Chung Mau Lo ◽  
Sheung Tat Fan

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1710-1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Hashimoto ◽  
Yasuhiko Sugawara ◽  
Sumihito Tamura ◽  
Kiyoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Yoji Kishi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 546
Author(s):  
Xiaopeng Yang ◽  
Jae Do Yang ◽  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Hong Pil Hwang ◽  
Sungwoo Ahn ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Partha Sarathi Ain ◽  
Uttam Kumar Roy ◽  
Krishna Sen ◽  
Debes Ray ◽  
Jayanta Pal

Introduction: Liver volume estimation is an essential component prior to major hepatic surgery and liver transplantation. Liver volume is evaluated with different formulae, gold standard Computed Tomography (CT) volumetry and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). As per literature review, studies comparing ultrasonography with formula based liver volume estimation are very few. Ultrasonography is non-invasive in nature and inexpensive. It is gaining popularity among clinicians as it helps in rapid evaluation of liver volumes. Aim: To compare variability of liver volume using 2D ultrasound with a standard well-established method based on formula derived by Johnson et al. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done between August-October 2020 and patients were selected by the physician from general Outpatient Department (OPD) pool and clinically screened for further biochemical studies. Participants aged 20-60 years with normal liver function test were recruited in the study. Images were taken on a Siemens Ultrasound System. Study variables included were liver volumes estimated by two methods, age, weight, height and Body Surface Area (BSA). F test was used to compare variability between liver volumes estimated by two different methods. Bivariate correlation between ultrasonography-based liver volume and different body indices was also tested. Results: Variability comparison using F test shows no significant difference (F=1.095, df1=149, df2=149, p=0.29). Liver volumes estimated by two methods showed good correlation with each other and is significant at the 0.01 level, r=0.574. The mean difference (125 cc) in volumes between two methods were statistically significant (t=10.92, degree of freedom=149, p<0.001) and were not in agreement with each other. Body parameters were correlated with liver volume estimated by 2D ultrasound. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is a useful tool in estimating liver volume prior to major hepatic resection. Formula based calculation of Standard Liver Volume (SLV) does not agree with USG based volume and underestimates the mean liver volume obtained by USG method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document