scholarly journals Lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without clarithromycin in patients with multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous transplant: a randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noemi Puig ◽  
Miguel T. Hernández ◽  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
Esther González ◽  
Felipe de Arriba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Population ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity ◽  
Full Trial

AbstractAlthough case-control analyses have suggested an additive value with the association of clarithromycin to continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), there are not phase III trials confirming these results. In this phase III trial, 286 patients with MM ineligible for ASCT received Rd with or without clarithromycin until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). With a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 0–54), no significant differences in the median PFS were observed between the two arms (C-Rd 23 months, Rd 29 months; HR 0.783, p = 0.14), despite a higher rate of complete response (CR) or better in the C-Rd group (22.6% vs 14.4%, p = 0.048). The most common G3–4 adverse events were neutropenia [12% vs 19%] and infections [30% vs 25%], similar between the two arms; however, the percentage of toxic deaths was higher in the C-Rd group (36/50 [72%] vs 22/40 [55%], p = 0.09). The addition of clarithromycin to Rd in untreated transplant ineligible MM patients does not improve PFS despite increasing the ≥CR rate due to the higher number of toxic deaths in the C-Rd arm. Side effects related to overexposure to steroids due to its delayed clearance induced by clarithromycin in this elderly population could explain these results. The trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov with the name GEM-CLARIDEX: Ld vs BiRd and with the following identifier NCT02575144. The full trial protocol can be accessed from ClinicalTrials.gov. This study received financial support from BMS/Celgene.

Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (CT-RT) versus RT alone for patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma: Long-term results of the RTOG 9402 phase III study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2008b-2008b ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gregory Cairncross ◽  
Meihua Wang ◽  
Edward G. Shaw ◽  
Robert B. Jenkins ◽  
Bernd W. Scheithauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Phase Iii Study

2008b Background: Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, pure (AO) and mixed (AOA), are chemosensitive tumors, especially if co-deleted for chromosomes 1p and 19q, but whether addition of CT to RT prolongs overall survival (OS), is unknown. Methods: In the RTOG 9402 Phase III trial, patients (pts) with AO/AOA were randomly assigned to PCV [procarbazine, CCNU (lomustine) and vincristine] followed by immediate RT vs. immediate RT alone. Early analysis showed no OS benefit for the PCV+RT group but combined therapy was associated with a longer progression-free survival (PFS). It also showed that the finding of 1p/19q co-deletion was associated with a longer OS independent of treatment. The current analysis has a median follow up of 11.3 years (yrs). Results: Two hundred ninety-one patients were randomized, 148 to PCV+RT and 143 to RT. PCV+RT was associated with longer PFS [2.5 vs. 1.7 yrs, hazard ratio (HR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.53, 0.88), P = 0.003] and the 1p/19q co-deletion with a longer Median Survival Time (MST) [8.7 vs. 2.7 yrs, HR 0.41, 95% CI (0.30, 0.55), P < 0.001]. For the entire cohort, there was no difference in MST by treatment [4.6 yrs for PCV+RT vs. 4.7 yrs for RT, HR 0.79, 95% CI (0.60, 1.04), P = 0.1]. However, patients with 1p/19q co-deleted tumors lived much longer after PCV+RT (n = 59) than after RT (n = 67) [14.7 vs. 7.3 yrs, HR 0.59, 95% CI (0.37, 0.95), P = 0.03]. There was no difference in MST by treatment in pts without the 1p/19q co-deletion [n=137; 2.6 vs. 2.7 yrs, HR 0.85, 95% CI (0.58, 1.23), P = 0.39]. Re-operation rates upon progression were similar between treatment arms in co-deleted pts (43%, PCV+RT vs. 54%, RT) but salvage CT rates were higher in the RT arm [57% vs. 81% (P = 0.04)]. Conclusions: PCV followed by immediate RT was a highly effective therapy for patients with 1p/19q co-deleted AO/AOA. In this setting, 1p/19q co-deletion was both prognostic and predictive, and the early PFS benefit in co-deleted cases was a harbinger of their longer OS. [This work was supported by RTOG grants U10 CA21661 and U10 CA32115, NCCTG grant U10 CA25224, ECOG grants CA17145 and CA21115, SWOG grant CA32102, and CCOP grant U10 CA37422 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI)]

Consolidation with Alemtuzumab Improves Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in First Remission - Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Phase III Trial of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 33-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Schweighofer ◽  
M. Ritgen ◽  
B. Eichhorst ◽  
R. Busch ◽  
M. Kneba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Purpose: Alemtuzumab (MabCampath) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the CD52 antigen, which is highly expressed on most human B and T lymphocytes. Alemtuzumab has shown considerable activity in both relapsed/refractory CLL and in the frontline treatment setting. In a recent study, treatment with single-agent alemtuzumab induced MRD-negative remissions in 20% of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL (Moreton et al JCO 2005;23:2971–2979). Other studies suggest that MRD negativity can also be attained when alemtuzumab is administered as consolidation for patients with CLL who achieve incomplete initial responses to chemotherapy. Here, we report our long-term experience within a randomized phase III trial that investigates the role of alemtuzumab for consolidation therapy in patients with previously untreated CLL. Methods: Pts in complete or partial remission after induction chemotherapy, with either fludarabine (F) or fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC), were randomized to receive either alemtuzumab 30 mg, 3 times a week for ≤12 wks or no further treatment. Of 21 eligible pts, who had responded to induction with F or FC (1 CR, 1 nPR, 9 PRs), 11 pts (median age: 60 years) randomized to receive alemtuzumab consolidation and 10 to the observation arm. Pts in the alemtuzumab arm received standard premedication and infection prophylaxis with famciclovir and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Results: After a median follow-up of 48 months, calculated from time of randomization within this consolidation trial, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved for pts who received alemtuzumab consolidation compared to those who received no further treatment (median PFS not reached versus 20.6 months, P = 0.004). PFS from the beginning of induction therapy with F or FC is also significantly greater for patients in the alemtuzumab consolidation arm versus the observation arm. So far, 3 of 11 pts presented with disease progression after alemtuzumab consolidation compared with 8/10 progressing pts in the observation arm. Differences in PFS between both arms were not associated with disease stage before first line treatment, type of first line chemotherapy (F vs. FC) or response status before initiation of consolidation therapy (CR vs. nPR vs. PR). Correlations between achievement of MRD negative responses and PFS is still under investigation and is planned for presentation. With the exception of 2 patients (1 pt in each arm) all patients remain alive. The study was stopped prematurely due to severe infections (7 CTC III infections, which included 4 CMV reactivations, 1 CTC IV infection) in 7/11 patients being treated with alemtuzumab. However, these infections were successfully treated, not associated with the cumulative dose of alemtuzumab, and no late complications of consolidation therapy have been observed. Conclusions: Although based on few pts due to incomplete accrual, long-term PFS was significantly prolonged in patients with CLL receiving alemtuzumab consolidation after first line chemotherapy with F or FC. An ongoing phase I/II trial of the GCLLSG (CLL2i) is currently evaluating the optimal dose and schedule of alemtuzumab in CLL pts after fludarabine-based chemotherapy.

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13578-13578
Author(s):  
C. Gennatas ◽  
V. Michalaki ◽  
S. Gennatas ◽  
A. Kondi-Paphiti ◽  
D. Voros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

13578 Background: Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine with superior activity and safety compared with bolus 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced CRC. Methods: Fourty-six patients (26 men and 20 women) with metastatic CRC entered this study. All patients were treated with capecitabine (1,000mg/m2 p.o.twice daily, days 1–14) and oxaliplatin (130mg/m2 on day 1). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Baseline characteristics: Median age 61 years (range 32–74), main sites of metastasis: Liver 32 patients (70%), liver and lungs 4 patients (9%), lungs 3 patients (6%), other sites 7 patients (15%). Results: 2 patients (4%) achieved complete response (CR), 17 patients (37%) achieved partial response (PR) and 7 patients (15%) attained stable disease (SD). With a median follow-up of 22 months the progression free survival was 7.5 months and overall survival was 19.0 months. All patients were assessable for toxicities. The most commonly encountered adverse events were from the gastrointestinal system (all grades 48%, grade 3, 6%). Neither toxic death nor life-threatening febrile neutropenia were reported. Conclusions: The combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin is a convenient regimen in patients with advanced CRC that is associated with considerable efficacy and limited toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Capecitabine in operable triple receptor–negative breast cancer: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase III trial.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 292-292
Author(s):  
C. M. Kelly ◽  
M. C. Green ◽  
K. Broglio ◽  
L. Pusztai ◽  
E. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival

292 Background: Recent data suggest that patients with operable triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) may derive greater benefit from the addition of capecitabine to anthracycline-taxane regimens. Methods: We examined pathological complete response (pCR), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with TNBC randomized to paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly (WP) x 12 followed by fluorouracil (500mg/m2), epirubicin (100mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (500mg/m2) every 3 weeks x 4 cycles (FEC) vs. docetaxel (75mg/m2) 3 weekly and capecitabine D1-14 (1500mg/m2 daily; DX) followed by FEC. Patients were stratified by timing of chemotherapy (preoperative vs. adjuvant). Results: 149 patients with TNBC comprising 25% of all patients randomized (N=601). Median age; 49 years (IQR; 41 to 55). The number and proportion of patients by stage were; I (n=32: 21.5%), IIA (n=72: 48.3%), IIB (n=34: 22.8%), IIIA (n=9: 6.0%) and IIIC (n=2; 1.3%). Preoperative therapy was administered to 58 patients (39%) and adjuvant to 91 (61%). There were 17 events (21%) in the DX arm and 10 events (15%) in the WP arm (P=0.36) including 11 distant recurrences in the DX arm and 9 in the WP arm (P=0.99). We observed a pCR in 11 patients (37%) and 10 (36%) in the DX and WP arms respectively (P=0.94). The odds ratio for pCR for patients with TNBC given DX vs. WP was 0.98 (95% CI; 0.33 to 2.80: P=0.94). At 50-months median follow-up the RFS and OS in patients with TNBC randomized to DX or WP was 77% (66 to 86%) and 83% (73 to 92%) (P=0.41) and 78% (67 to 87%) and 87% (77 to 95%) (P=0.16) respectively. RFS and OS for WP vs. DX for non-TNBC was 93% (87 to 95%) and 92% (88 to 96%) (p=0.91) and 96% (92 to 98%) and 97% (94 to 99%) for WP and DX respectively (P=0.39). Conclusions: In this unplanned subgroup analysis there was no difference in pCR, RFS or OS in patients with operable TNBC randomized to WP or DX however, power is limited and should be considered when interpreting these data.

Capecitabine (X) and taxanes in patients (pts) with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Sequential vs. combined therapy results from a MOSG randomized phase III trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 570-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Soto ◽  
L. Torrecillas ◽  
S. Reyes ◽  
M. Ramirez ◽  
L. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Weekly Cycles

570 Introduction: Capecitabine (Xeloda [X]) shows synergy with taxanes and adding X to docetaxel (T) extends overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and progression free-survival (PFS) beyond T alone. Sequential single-agent therapy could confer convenience benefits and may be more appropriate than combination chemotherapy for some pts. Methods: Pts with anthracycline-pretreated MBC received 3-weekly cycles of 1 of the following regimens: X→taxane (X 1250mg/m2 bid d1–14, followed after progression (PD) by T 100mg/m2 or paclitaxel [P] 175mg/m2 day 1; X+P (X 825mg/m2 bid days 1–14 + P 175mg/m2 day 1) or X+T (X 825mg/m2 bid days 1–14 + T 75mg/m2 day 1). Results: Of the 368 pts enrolled, 91 are either still on therapy or not evaluable. The table shows baseline characteristics, efficacy and safety in evaluable pts. Median follow up is 15.5 months. Median doses for X in each arm (1st cycle vs. 8th cycle, mg/m2 bid): 1218 vs. 1054; 948 vs. 900; 846 vs. 751. Median doses for P and T (1st cycle vs. 8th cycle, mg/m2): 173 vs. 169 and 75 vs. 72, respectively. In the X→taxane arm, 58 pts (64%) received sequential taxane; the remainder did not receive a taxane, either because they were still on X, had CR or had rapid PD. Conclusions: RR is higher with XP and XT, but PFS and OS are similar at a median follow-up of 15.5 months. All regimens were well tolerated with minimal grade 4 AEs. Because there is no clear superiority of sequential vs. combined therapy, pt characteristics are likely to be used to decide which regimen is the most appropriate. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Five years' results of the German ARO 04-01 trial of concurrent 72 Gy hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) plus once weekly cisplatinum/5-FU versus mitomycin C/5-FU in stage IV head and neck cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5512-5512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Budach ◽  
Chie-Hee Cho ◽  
Benedikt Sedlmaier ◽  
Michael Wittlinger ◽  
Heinrich Iro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Regional Control ◽  
Late Morbidity ◽  
Radiation Sequelae

5512 Background: Are 6 cycles of once weekly DDP plus one cycle of 5-FU with concurrent HART superior to 2 cycles of MMC plus one cycle of 5-FU in terms of overall survival (OS) and metastases-free survival (MFS)? Methods: Eligibility: Stage IV SCC of oro(OP)- and hypopharynx(HP), KFS of ≥80% stratified for sites, N-status, grading, hemoglobin and center. The HART schedule was reported elsewhere (V.Budach, JCO 23;2005). HART was applied concurrently with DDP/5-FU at 30mg/m² days 1,8,15,22,29,36 or MMC/5-FU at 10mg/m2 day 1+36 and for both arms with 600mg/m² 5-FU days 1-5 as 120 hrs. c.i. TVD dose prescription was 72 Gy using 3D-conformal or IMRT-TP. 364 patients were analysed using an ITT principle for OS, MFS, progression-free survival (PFS) and loco-regional control (LRC). Hazard ratio (HR) calculations were adjusted for competing risk factors. Results: Median follow-up was 48 mos. for both arms. Mean age was 55.4 years, 83/17% were male/female and 100% stage IV patients (UICC 2002). 58.5%/41.5% of all patients suffered from OP- or HP cancer, respectively. The OS and MFS at 4 years for the DDP- versus MMC-arm was 42.1% vs. 38.8% (n.s.) and 67.3% vs. 56.6% (p=.05), respectively. The LRC and PFS for the DDP versus MMC-arm was 58.6% vs. 57.2% (n.s.) and 46.4% vs. 38.7% (n.s.). Seven items recorded for acute toxicity and 9 for late morbidity showed no significant differences between the treatment arms except for creatinine for the DDP-arm (p < 0.001) using nonparametric analyses of variances for repeated measurements. The overall compliance rates for RTX were 96%, DDP: 72%, 5-FU: 97%, MMC: 86%, respectively. Conclusions: This phase III trial first establishes level IB-evidence for a once weekly DDP chemoradiation regimen. For MFS at 4 yrs., DDP/5 FU-HART is superior to MMC/5 FU HART at equal levels of acute and late radiation sequelae for both treatment arms. No significant differences were seen yet for OS, PFS or LRC. Chemoradiation with weekly DDP/5-FU or MMC/5-FU shows excellent compliance rates and can easily compete with other concurrent chemo- or bio-radiation schedules including induction TPF followed by radiation.

Addition of Rituximab to First-Line MCP (Mitoxantrone, Chlorambucil, Prednisolone) Chemotherapy Prolongs Survival in Advanced Follicular Lymphoma - 4 Year Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Trial of the East German Study Group Hematology and Oncology (OSHO#39).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 484-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Herold ◽  
Antje Haas ◽  
Stephanie Srock ◽  
Sabine Neser ◽  
Kathrin H. Al Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Striking Difference ◽  
P Value ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab plus chemotherapy has been proved to be the gold - standard in treating advanced follicular lymphoma. Here we report the 4-year-follow-up data of our phase III trial comparing MCP - chemotherapy vs rituximab + MCP both followed by interferon maintenance in advanced symptomatic follicular lymphoma. Methods: Previously untreated patients with advanced stage (III + IV) symptomatic CD 20-positive indolent NHL and mantle cell lymphoma (n=358) were randomized to receive either MCP-chemotherapy (mitoxantrone 8 mg/m² d1+2, chlorambucil 3x3 mg/m² d 1–5, prednisolone 25 mg/m² d 1–5 x 8 q 4 weeks) or MCP + rituximab (375 mg/m² d −1). Here we report the results of the ITT population of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) (grade 1+2), who represented the majority of patients and for whom the sample size primarily was calculated, so this is not a subgroup analysis. Study endpoints included overall and complete response rate (RR + CR), progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Results: with a median follow - up of nearly 4 years (47 months) we are able to provide relatively mature data. Concerning toxicities there was no striking difference, but there was a significantly increased risk to experience a CTC grade III or IV toxicity for leukocytes in the R-MCP arm, however this did not increase the risk of infections. For the FL - ITT population the results are given in the table. Conclusions: Concerning all end points rituximab plus MCP is significantly superior to MCP alone in the treatment of advanced follicular lymphoma. Special attention should be drawn to the fact, that after a median follow-up of 47 months we can demonstrate a clinically and statistically significant survival advantage for the immunochemotherapy. Results R-MCP (n=105) MCP (n=96) p-value Response rate 92,4% 75% .0004 Complete Response 49,5% 25% .0009 PFS median n.r. 29 months &lt; .0001 PSF 4 years 71% 40% EFS median n.r. 26 months &lt; .0001 EFS 4 years 69% 35,5% TTNT median n.r. 29,4 months .0002 OS median n.r. n.r. .0096 OS 4 years 87% 74%

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Sven T. Langkjer ◽  
Jorn Andersen ◽  
Johanna Sjöström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document