scholarly journals Development and validation of a novel risk score for the detection of insignificant prostate cancer in unscreened patient cohorts

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (12) ◽  
pp. 1445-1450
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Dutto ◽  
Amar Ahmad ◽  
Katerina Urbanova ◽  
Christian Wagner ◽  
Andreas Schuette ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 120 (7) ◽  
pp. 771-771
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Dutto ◽  
Amar Ahmad ◽  
Katerina Urbanova ◽  
Christian Wagner ◽  
Andreas Schuette ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5073-5073
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Dutto ◽  
Jorn H. Witt ◽  
Katarina Urbanova ◽  
Christian Wagner ◽  
Andreas Schuette ◽  
...  

5073 Background: Active surveillance is increasingly used for insignificant prostate cancer (PCa). In order to identify suitable patients, risk scores have been developed which use pre-operative factors. We evaluated the accuracy of 9 separate tools developed to identify patients harbouring insignificant PCa in 2613 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for Gleason 3+3 PCa. We have developed and validated a novel risk score to correctly identify insignificant PCa for use in unscreened patient cohorts using non-dichotomised clinical predictors. Methods: 2799 patients who would have been candidates for AS (Gleason score 6 only) patients underwent robotic radical prostatectomy between 2006 and 2016 at a tertiary referral center. The volume and grade of tumour in the resected prostate was analysed. Inignificant PCa was defined as Gleason 3+3 only, index tumour volume <1.3 cm3 , total tumour volume <2.5 cm3 (updated ERSPC definition). 2613 patients were included in the final analysis. We computed the accuracy (specificity, sensitivity and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic) of 9 predictive tools. Multivariate logistic regression with elastic net regularisation was used to develop a novel tool to predict insignificant prostate cancer using age at diagnosis, baseline PSA, TRUS volume, clinical T-stage, number of positive cores and percentage of positive cores as predictors. This tool was validated in an external cohort of 441 unscreened patients undergoing surgery for Gleason 6 PCa. Results: All of the predefined tools rated poorly as predictors of insignificant disease as none of them reached the required AUC threshold of 0.7. The new tool performed well in training and validation cohorts. Conclusions: Pre-existing predictive tools to identify indolent PCa have a poor predictive value when applied to an unscreened cohort of patients. Our novel tool shows good predictive power for insignificant PCa in this population in training and validation cohorts. The inherent selection bias due to analysis of a surgical cohort is acknowledged. [Table: see text]


BJUI Compass ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Klocker ◽  
Bruno Golding ◽  
Stephan Weber ◽  
Eberhard Steiner ◽  
Pierre Tennstedt ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 435
Author(s):  
Subas Neupane ◽  
Jaakko Nevalainen ◽  
Jani Raitanen ◽  
Kirsi Talala ◽  
Paula Kujala ◽  
...  

We developed and validated a prognostic index to predict survival from prostate cancer (PCa) based on the Finnish randomized screening trial (FinRSPC). Men diagnosed with localized PCa (N = 7042) were included. European Association of Urology risk groups were defined. The follow-up was divided into three periods (0–3, 3–9 and 9–20 years) for development and two corresponding validation periods (3–6 and 9–15 years). A multivariable complementary log–log regression model was used to calculate the full prognostic index. Predicted cause-specific survival at 10 years from diagnosis was calculated for the control arm using a simplified risk score at diagnosis. The full prognostic index discriminates well men with PCa with different survival. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.83 for both the 3–6 year and 9–15 year validation periods. In the simplified risk score, patients with a low risk score at diagnosis had the most favorable survival, while the outcome was poorest for the patients with high risk scores. The prognostic index was able to distinguish well between men with higher and lower survival, and the simplified risk score can be used as a basis for decision making.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 154-154
Author(s):  
Michael Alschibaja ◽  
Joerg Massmann ◽  
Armin Funk ◽  
Heiner Van Randenborgh ◽  
Rudolf Hartung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document