scholarly journals Combining callers improves the detection of copy number variants from whole-genome sequencing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Coutelier ◽  
Manuel Holtgrewe ◽  
Marten Jäger ◽  
Ricarda Flöttman ◽  
Martin A. Mensah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Copy Number Variants ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Whole Exome ◽  
Human Pathology

AbstractCopy Number Variants (CNVs) are deletions, duplications or insertions larger than 50 base pairs. They account for a large percentage of the normal genome variation and play major roles in human pathology. While array-based approaches have long been used to detect them in clinical practice, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) bears the promise to allow concomitant exploration of CNVs and smaller variants. However, accurately calling CNVs from WGS remains a difficult computational task, for which a consensus is still lacking. In this paper, we explore practical calling options to reach the best compromise between sensitivity and sensibility. We show that callers based on different signal (paired-end reads, split reads, coverage depth) yield complementary results. We suggest approaches combining four selected callers (Manta, Delly, ERDS, CNVnator) and a regenotyping tool (SV2), and show that this is applicable in everyday practice in terms of computation time and further interpretation. We demonstrate the superiority of these approaches over array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH), specifically regarding the lack of resolution in breakpoint definition and the detection of potentially relevant CNVs. Finally, we confirm our results on the NA12878 benchmark genome, as well as one clinically validated sample. In conclusion, we suggest that WGS constitutes a timely and economically valid alternative to the combination of aCGH and whole-exome sequencing.

scholarly journals SECNVs: A Simulator of Copy Number Variants and Whole-Exome Sequences from Reference Genomes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Xing ◽  
Alan R. Dabney ◽  
Xiao Li ◽  
Guosong Wang ◽  
Clare A. Gill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Copy Number Variants ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Software Applications ◽  
Exome Sequencing Data ◽  
Whole Exome ◽  
Whole Exome Sequencing Data

AbstractCopy number variants are insertions and deletions of 1 kb or larger in a genome that play an important role in phenotypic changes and human disease. Many software applications have been developed to detect copy number variants using either whole-genome sequencing or whole-exome sequencing data. However, there is poor agreement in the results from these applications. Simulated datasets containing copy number variants allow comprehensive comparisons of the operating characteristics of existing and novel copy number variant detection methods. Several software applications have been developed to simulate copy number variants and other structural variants in whole-genome sequencing data. However, none of the applications reliably simulate copy number variants in whole-exome sequencing data. We have developed and tested SECNVs (Simulator of Exome Copy Number Variants), a fast, robust and customizable software application for simulating copy number variants and whole-exome sequences from a reference genome. SECNVs is easy to install, implements a wide range of commands to customize simulations, can output multiple samples at once, and incorporates a pipeline to output rearranged genomes, short reads and BAM files in a single command. Variants generated by SECNVs are detected with high sensitivity and precision by tools commonly used to detect copy number variants. SECNVs is publicly available at https://github.com/YJulyXing/SECNVs.

0306 Exploring the feasibility of using copy number variants as genetic markers through large-scale whole genome sequencing experiments

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
D. M. Bickhart ◽  
L. Xu ◽  
J. L. Hutchison ◽  
J. B. Cole ◽  
D. J. Null ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genetic Markers ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Copy Number Variants ◽  
Whole Genome

scholarly journals Detection and characterization of copy number variants based on whole-genome sequencing by DNBSEQ platforms

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junhua Rao ◽  
Lihua Peng ◽  
Fang Chen ◽  
Hui Jiang ◽  
Chunyu Geng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Copy Number Variants ◽  
Copy Number Variant ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Distribution Sensitivity ◽  
Cnv Detection

AbstractBackgroundNext-generation sequence (NGS) has rapidly developed in past years which makes whole-genome sequencing (WGS) becoming a more cost- and time-efficient choice in wide range of biological researches. We usually focus on some variant detection via WGS data, such as detection of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), insertion and deletion (Indel) and copy number variant (CNV), which playing an important role in many human diseases. However, the feasibility of CNV detection based on WGS by DNBSEQ™ platforms was unclear. We systematically analysed the genome-wide CNV detection power of DNBSEQ™ platforms and Illumina platforms on NA12878 with five commonly used tools, respectively.ResultsDNBSEQ™ platforms showed stable ability to detect slighter more CNVs on genome-wide (average 1.24-fold than Illumina platforms). Then, CNVs based on DNBSEQ™ platforms and Illumina platforms were evaluated with two public benchmarks of NA12878, respectively. DNBSEQ™ and Illumina platforms showed similar sensitivities and precisions on both two benchmarks. Further, the difference between tools for CNV detection was analyzed, and indicated the selection of tool for CNV detection could affected the CNV performance, such as count, distribution, sensitivity and precision.ConclusionThe major contribution of this paper is providing a comprehensive guide for CNV detection based on WGS by DNBSEQ™ platforms for the first time.

Copy‐Number Variants Detection by Low‐Pass Whole‐Genome Sequencing

2017 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zirui Dong ◽  
Weiwei Xie ◽  
Haixiao Chen ◽  
Jinjin Xu ◽  
Huilin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Copy Number Variants ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Low Pass

scholarly journals Performance of copy number variants detection based on whole-genome sequencing by DNBSEQ platforms

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junhua Rao ◽  
Lihua Peng ◽  
Xinming Liang ◽  
Hui Jiang ◽  
Chunyu Geng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Technology Use ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Massively Parallel Sequencing ◽  
Copy Number Variants ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Single Nucleotide Variants ◽  
Cnv Detection

Abstract Background DNBSEQ™ platforms are new massively parallel sequencing (MPS) platforms that use DNA nanoball technology. Use of data generated from DNBSEQ™ platforms to detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels) has proven to be quite effective, while the feasibility of copy number variants (CNVs) detection is unclear. Results Here, we first benchmarked different CNV detection tools based on Illumina whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of NA12878 and then assessed these tools in CNV detection based on DNBSEQ™ sequencing data from the same sample. When the same tool was used, the CNVs detected based on DNBSEQ™ and Illumina data were similar in quantity, length and distribution, while great differences existed within results from different tools and even based on data from a single platform. We further estimated the CNV detection power based on available CNV benchmarks of NA12878 and found similar precision and sensitivity between the DNBSEQ™ and Illumina platforms. We also found higher precision of CNVs shorter than 1 kbp based on DNBSEQ™ platforms than those based on Illumina platforms by using Pindel, DELLY and LUMPY. We carefully compared these two available benchmarks and found a large proportion of specific CNVs between them. Thus, we constructed a more complete CNV benchmark of NA12878 containing 3512 CNV regions. Conclusions We assessed and benchmarked CNV detections based on WGS with DNBSEQ™ platforms and provide guidelines for future studies.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Tools for Copy-Number Variation Detection in Germline Whole Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing Data

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6283
Author(s):  
Migle Gabrielaite ◽  
Mathias Husted Torp ◽  
Malthe Sebro Rasmussen ◽  
Sergio Andreu-Sánchez ◽  
Filipe Garrett Vieira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Reference Sample ◽  
Snp Array ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Whole Genome Sequencing Data ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Standard Reference Sample ◽  
Whole Exome

Copy-number variations (CNVs) have important clinical implications for several diseases and cancers. Relevant CNVs are hard to detect because common structural variations define large parts of the human genome. CNV calling from short-read sequencing would allow single protocol full genomic profiling. We reviewed 50 popular CNV calling tools and included 11 tools for benchmarking in a reference cohort encompassing 39 whole genome sequencing (WGS) samples paired current clinical standard—SNP-array based CNV calling. Additionally, for nine samples we also performed whole exome sequencing (WES), to address the effect of sequencing protocol on CNV calling. Furthermore, we included Gold Standard reference sample NA12878, and tested 12 samples with CNVs confirmed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Tool performance varied greatly in the number of called CNVs and bias for CNV lengths. Some tools had near-perfect recall of CNVs from arrays for some samples, but poor precision. Several tools had better performance for NA12878, which could be a result of overfitting. We suggest combining the best tools also based on different methodologies: GATK gCNV, Lumpy, DELLY, and cn.MOPS. Reducing the total number of called variants could potentially be assisted by the use of background panels for filtering of frequently called variants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document