scholarly journals Neoadjuvant FLOT versus SOX phase II randomized clinical trial for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Sah ◽  
Benyan Zhang ◽  
Huan Zhang ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Fei Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Regression Grading ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

AbstractNeoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FLOT regimen) has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). However, tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) is the preferred chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. Here, we conduct an open label, two-arm, phase II randomized interventional clinical trial (Dragon III; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03636893) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens. Patients with LAGC are randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of the neoadjuvant FLOT regimen (40 patients) or 3 cycles of the SOX regimen (34 patients) before gastrectomy. The primary endpoint is the comparison of complete (TRG1a) or subtotal (TRG1b) tumor regression grading in the primary tumor. There are no significant differences in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. No significant differences in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT group and the SOX group are found. Complete or subtotal TRG is 20.0% in the FLOT group versus 32.4% in the SOX group. Therefore, our study does not find statistically significant differences between neoadjuvant FLOT and SOX regimens for the primary outcomes reported here in locally advanced gastric cancer.

scholarly journals A PHASE II TRIAL EXPLORING THE EXTENSIVE INTRA-OPERATIVE PERITONEAL LAVAGE (EIPL) AS A PROPHYLACTIC STRATEGY FOR PERITONEAL RECURRENCE IN LOCALLY ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER: reporting postoperative morbidity and mortality after early closure

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thales Paulo BATISTA ◽  
Mário Rino MARTINS ◽  
Euclides Dias MARTINS-FILHO ◽  
Rogerio Luiz dos SANTOS
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Peritoneal Lavage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Background The Extensive Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage (EIPL) has been proposed as a practical prophylactic strategy to decrease the risk of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of the EIPL in our locally advanced gastric cancer patients. Methods This study is an open-label, double-center, single-arm phase II clinical trial developed at two tertiary hospitals from Recife (Pernambuco, Brazil). Results The study protocol was prematurely closed due to slow accrual after only 16 patients had been recruited to participate. Eight of them were excluded of the protocol study during the laparotomy, whereas four cases were also excluded from the per-protocol analysis. Two patients had died in hospital before 30 days and six were alive with no evidence of cancer relapses after a follow-up ranging from five to 14,2 months (median of 10.6 months). In the intention-to-treat analysis, three of eight patients suffered of gastrointestinal leakages and two of them had died. On a per-protocol basis, two of four patients presented this type of postoperative complication and one of them had died. All deaths occurred as a somewhat consequence of gastrointestinal leakages. Conclusion We could not make any conclusion about the safety and efficacy of the EIPL, but the possibility of this approach might increase the rate of gastrointestinal leakage is highlighted.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FLOT) Versus S-1 plus Oxaliplatin (SOX) for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birendra Kumar Sah ◽  
Benyan Zhang ◽  
Huan Zhang ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Fei Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Regression Grading ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractBackgroundDespite growing trends of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, there is still no consensus of optimal regimens between East and West countries. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FLOT) regimen has shown promising results in terms of pathological response and survival rate. However, S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) is a more favorable chemotherapy regimen in Eastern countries. We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both regimens, and to explore a suitable regimen for Chinese patients.MethodsPatients with locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC) were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive either 4 cycles of FLOT or 3 cycles of SOX regimen before curative gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the comparison of complete or sub-total tumor regression grading (TRG1a+ TRG1b) in the primary tumor.ResultsAltogether 74 cases enrolled between August 2018 and March 2020. All 74 randomly assigned cases were considered as intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and the 55 patients who completed the planned chemotherapy plus surgery were considered as per protocol (PP) population. There was no significant difference in pre-treatment clinicopathological parameters between the FLOT and SOX group(p>0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse effects or postoperative morbidity and mortality between two groups (p>0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the proportion of tumor regression grading between the FLOT and SOX group(p>0.05). In the ITT population, complete or sub-total TRG was 20.0 % in FLOT versus 32.4 % in the SOX group (p>0.05).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that FLOT and SOX regimens are similarly effective for locally advanced gastric cancer patients in terms of clinical downstaging and pathological response. Both regimens were well-tolerated in this study. A large scale phase 3 randomized controlled trial is necessary to validate this result.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a modified FOLFOX6 regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 81-81
Author(s):  
Xiang Wang ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Hongfeng Liu ◽  
Chunmei Bai ◽  
Xiaoyi Li
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Postoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Regression Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Laurén Classification

81 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the mFOLFOX6 regimen in gastric cancer patients. Methods: This study was a single-arm phase II study. 73 patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced gastric cancer (T2-T4 or N+) were enrolled. The patients were administered the mFOLFOX6 regimen for 3 cycles. Surgery was scheduled 3-4 weeks after the completion of the chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy began 4 weeks after surgery, and the program choice was based on the results of patients’ clinical/pathological evaluations. Perioperative efficacy, toxicity, effects of surgery, postoperative observation, and prognosis were studied. Survival analysis was performed to identify the relationship between the response and outcome and to identify factors predictive of OS. Results: 73 patients received the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 67 (91.8%) completed all of the preoperative cycles, with grade 3-4 toxicity arising in 33.0%. Surgery was performed in 71 (97.3%) patients, and radical resection was achieved in 67 (91.8%) patients. Postoperative chemotherapy started in 63 (88.7%) patients. The radiology response rate of chemotherapy was 45.8%. Among the patients who underwent radical surgery, pT downstaging was observed in 22 (32.8%) patients and pN downstaging was observed in 17 (25.4%) patients. All of the patients showed different levels of histological regression of the primary tumour, with a ≥ 50% regression rate of 49.2% and a pCR rate of 3.0%. Univariate analysis identified factors that were associated with OS, including local tumour infiltration, Lauren classification, pre-chemotherapy N stage, ypTNM stage, and pathologic regression rate (GHR)( ≥ 2/3/ < 2/3, ≥ 50%/ < 50%). Multivariate analysis identified both ypTNM stage and Lauren classification as independent predictors of survival. Conclusions: The mFOLFOX6 regimen was very effective and well-tolerated as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. The ypTNM stage could serve as an independent predictor of survival. GHR ≥ 50% / < 50% could be used as a surrogate marker to guide the selection of a postoperative chemotherapy regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02226380.

Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin plus ftorafur versus mitomycin alone in resected locally advanced gastric cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1036-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Grau ◽  
J Estapé ◽  
J Fuster ◽  
X Filella ◽  
J Visa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE We performed a clinical trial to determine whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with two drugs versus one drug could prolong survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1985 to 1996, 85 patients with completely resected locally advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. The subjects were randomized into two treatment groups, as follows: mitomycin (MMC) 10 to 20 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 every 6 weeks plus ftorafur (FT) 500 mg/m2/d for 36 consecutive days; or MMC alone, 10 to 20 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks. All courses were repeated four times. RESULTS After a median follow-up duration of 62 months, the overall 5-year survival rates were 67% for the MMC-FT group versus 44% for the MMC group (P = .04). Subgroup analysis to compare survival curves using the method of Mantel-Cox showed survival rates significantly in favor of the MMC-FT group in the subsets of patients with node-negative disease (P = .01) and those whose disease was stage IB or II (P = .008). CONCLUSION Significantly better survival results were observed for MMC-FT versus MMC alone. Subset analysis suggest a strong benefit in patients with node-negative and early-stage resected gastric cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document