scholarly journals Pragmatic trial on inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal in patients with COPD in general practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisette van den Bemt ◽  
Lotte van den Nieuwenhof ◽  
Anne Rutjes ◽  
Victor van der Meer ◽  
Gerben Stege ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Pragmatic Trial ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Corticosteroid Withdrawal ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Therapeutic Value ◽  
Exacerbation Risk ◽  
Bronchodilator Treatment

Abstract The therapeutic value of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for COPD is limited. In published RCTs, ICS could be withdrawn in COPD patients without increasing exacerbation risk when bronchodilator treatment is optimized. Here we report on the feasibility and risks of ICS withdrawal in Dutch general practice for COPD patients without an indication for ICSs. In our pragmatic trial, general practitioners decided autonomously which of their COPD patients on ICS treatment could stop this, how this was done, and whether additional bronchodilator therapy was needed. We recruited 62 COPD patients (58 analysed) who were eligible for ICS withdrawal in 79 practices. In 32 patients (55.2%, 95% CI: 42.5–67.3%) ICS was withdrawn successfully, 19 (32.8%, 95% CI: 22.1–45.6%) restarted ICS treatment within six months, 12 patients (20.7%, 95% CI: 12.3–32.8%) had a moderate exacerbation, and one patient had a severe exacerbation. ICS withdrawal was successful in just over half of the patients with COPD without an indication for ICS.

scholarly journals Reassessing the Role of Eosinophils as a Biomarker in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinè ◽  
Biondini ◽  
Semenzato ◽  
Bazzan ◽  
Cosio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Exacerbation Risk ◽  
Blood Eosinophils

Blood eosinophils measurement, as proxy for tissue eosinophils, has become an important biomarker for exacerbation risk and response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Its use to determine the pharmacological approach is recommended in the latest COPD guidelines. The potential role of blood eosinophils is mainly based on data derived from post-hoc and retrospective analyses that showed an association between increased blood eosinophils and risk of exacerbations, as well as mitigation of this risk with ICS. Yet other publications, including studies in real life COPD, do not confirm these assumptions. Moreover, anti-eosinophil therapy targeting interleukin (IL)-5 failed to reduce exacerbations in COPD patients with high blood eosinophils, which casts significant doubts on the role of eosinophils in COPD. Furthermore, a reduction of eosinophils might be harmful since COPD patients with relatively high eosinophils have better pulmonary function, better life quality, less infections and longer survival. These effects are probably linked to the role of eosinophils in the immune response against pathogens. In conclusion, in COPD, high blood eosinophils are widely used as a biomarker for exacerbation risk and response to ICS. However, much is yet to be learned about the reasons for the high eosinophil counts, their variations and their controversial effects on the fate of COPD patients.

Self-titration of inhaled corticosteroid and β2-agonist in response to symptoms in mild asthma: a pre-specified analysis from the PRACTICAL randomised controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 2000170
Author(s):  
Christina Baggott ◽  
Jo Hardy ◽  
Jenny Sparks ◽  
Mark Holliday ◽  
Daniela Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Mild Asthma ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Electronic Monitors ◽  
Exacerbation Risk ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Β2 Agonist

IntroductionIn mild asthma, as-needed budesonide–formoterol is superior or noninferior to maintenance budesonide plus as-needed short-acting β2-agonist in reducing severe exacerbations. In this pre-specified analysis, we investigated patterns of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and β2-agonist use in PRACTICAL, a randomised controlled trial.MethodsParticipants were randomised 1:1 to as-needed budesonide–formoterol (200/6 μg Turbuhaler, one actuation) or maintenance budesonide (200 μg Turbuhaler, one actuation twice a day) with as-needed terbutaline (250 μg, two actuations) for 52 weeks. 110 participants had electronic monitors attached to their study inhalers which captured the time and date of every actuation. Key outcome measures were patterns of ICS and β2-agonist use. One actuation of budesonide–formoterol was considered to be an equivalent bronchodilator dose as two actuations of terbutaline.ResultsParticipants randomised to as-needed budesonide–formoterol had more days with no ICS use compared with maintenance budesonide (median total days of no use 156 versus 22 days, respectively), lower median daily budesonide dose (164 versus 328 μg, respectively) and a greater median number of days of ≥4 budesonide actuations (4 versus 1 days, respectively). Participants randomised to as-needed budesonide–formoterol took higher equivalent doses of β2-agonist both overall (median number of actuations 0.8 versus 0.3 per day, respectively) and in response to worsening asthma (total number of “overuse days” of >8 or >16 actuations of budesonide–formoterol or terbutaline 33 versus 10 days, respectively).ConclusionsThe timing of ICS dose when self-titrated to β2-agonist use is more important than total ICS dose in reducing severe exacerbation risk in mild asthma, when associated with greater overall use of as-needed β2-agonist.

Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting bronchodilator treatment mitigates STEMI clinical presentation in COPD patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Contoli ◽  
Gianluca Campo ◽  
Rita Pavasini ◽  
Irene Marchi ◽  
Alessia Pauletti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Bronchodilator Treatment ◽  
Long Acting

scholarly journals Short-term responses to high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a fractional nitric oxide concentration over 35 parts per billion: A single-centre pre–post study

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 012-017
Author(s):  
Shiroshita Akihiro ◽  
Tanaka Yu ◽  
Nakashima Kei ◽  
Shiraishi Atsushi ◽  
Matsui Hiroki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Exhaled Nitric Oxide ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Oxide Concentration ◽  
Nitric Oxide Concentration

Introduction: There is currently no strategy for identifying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients whose pulmonary function could benefit from inhaled corticosteroids. We investigated whether a 28-day regime of inhaled corticosteroids improved pulmonary function test results among COPD patients with a fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration > 35 parts per billion. Methods: This single-centre one-arm pre–post trial included COPD patients with a fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration > 35 parts per billion treated at our institution from September 2018 to August 2019. Patients were administered budesonide (200 μg, 8 puffs daily) for 28 days. The primary outcome measure was the difference between the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at baseline and after 28 days of inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Secondary outcomes included differences in COPD Assessment Test scores, %FEV1, and that between the percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) at baseline and after 28 days of treatment. Results: Twenty patients completed the 28-day inhaled corticosteroid regime. The mean difference in FEV1 between day 1 and day 28 was 340 mL (95% confidence interval: −100 to 770 mL; p = 0.122). The mean differences in secondary outcomes were: %FVC, −0.16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.84 to 2.53%; p = 0.905); %FEV1, 1.63% (95%CI: −4.56 to 7.81%; p = 0.589); COPD Assessment Test score, −2.50 (95%CI: −5.72 to 0.72; p = 0.121). Conclusion: The 28-day course of inhaled corticosteroids yielded no significant difference in FEV1 for COPD patients with a fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration > 35 parts per billion. Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network Center, UMIN000034005. Registered 3 September 2018, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000038557

scholarly journals Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: friend or foe?

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1801219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvar Agusti ◽  
Leonardo M. Fabbri ◽  
Dave Singh ◽  
Jørgen Vestbo ◽  
Bartolome Celli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
History Of ◽  
Bronchodilator Treatment ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Blood Eosinophils

The efficacy, safety and positioning of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is much debated, since it can result in clear clinical benefits in some patients (“friend”) but can be ineffective or even associated with undesired side effects,e.g.pneumonia, in others (“foe”). After critically reviewing the evidence for and against ICS treatment in patients with COPD, we propose that: 1) ICS should not be used as a single, stand-alone therapy in COPD; 2) patients most likely to benefit from the addition of ICS to long-acting bronchodilators include those with history of multiple or severe exacerbations despite appropriate maintenance bronchodilator use, particularly if blood eosinophils are >300 cells·µL−1, and those with a history of and/or concomitant asthma; and 3) the risk of pneumonia in COPD patients using ICS is higher in those with older age, lower body mass index (BMI), greater overall fragility, receiving higher ICS doses and those with blood eosinophils <100 cells·µL−1. All these factors must be carefully considered and balanced in any individual COPD patient before adding ICS to her/his maintenance bronchodilator treatment. Further research is needed to clarify some of these issues and firmly establish these recommendations.

Narrative Literature Review Guided Approach of Inhaled Corticosteroid de-escalation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110537
Author(s):  
Anamarie Tomaich ◽  
Shawnee Klatt ◽  
Michael W. Nagy
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting

Objective To review the 2020 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report recommendations and create an algorithm to assist clinicians in determining which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients qualify for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) de-escalation. Data Sources: A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed from 2002 to August 2021 was conducted using the search terms inhaled corticosteroids, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and de-escalation and review of the reference lists of identified articles for pertinent citations. Study Selection and Data Extraction Relevant studies and articles were included if they focused on the utilization of ICS in COPD. Data Synthesis The 2020 GOLD report only recommends triple therapy with ICS, long acting beta agonists, and long acting muscarinic antagonists for patients with frequent exacerbations, frequent hospitalizations, or elevated blood eosinophil counts. Despite this clear framework, patients are prescribed ICS without these characteristics. Available evidence suggests that these patients can be de-escalated from ICS therapy without concern for worsening lung function or exacerbations. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Patients with COPD may be experiencing more risk than benefit on ICS therapy. Clinicians should be knowledgeable on how to evaluate patient therapy for appropriateness and know how to safely deprescribe ICS given their limited efficacy in many COPD patients. Conclusion There remains no specific guidance on how to de-escalate patients off an ICS when the therapy is not indicated. Use of clinical evidence with stepwise algorithms can be models to approach de-escalation of ICS in patients with COPD.

scholarly journals Severe exacerbation and pneumonia in COPD patients treated with fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 agonist

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 2477-2485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsi-Hsing Yang ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
Ya-Hui Wang ◽  
Wei-Chih Yang ◽  
Cheng-Yi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Copd Patients ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Beta2 Agonist

Clinical and economic impact of inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal in Spanish COPD patients treated with triple therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Neches ◽  
Laura Amanda Vallejo-Aparicio ◽  
Afisi Ismaila ◽  
Antoni Sicras-Mainar ◽  
Aram Sicras-Navarro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Impact ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Corticosteroid Withdrawal ◽  
Copd Patients

scholarly journals Recent advances in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon R Rosenberg ◽  
Ravi Kalhan
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroid ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Corticosteroid Withdrawal ◽  
Recent Advances ◽  
Additional Therapy

Novel pharmacotherapies introduce additional options to providers and patients in how to best treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Emerging data question the role of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD treatment, particularly as combination dual bronchodilator pharmacotherapies demonstrate robust results. For those maximized on pharmacotherapy with continued dyspnea or exacerbations or both, emerging bronchoscopic procedures may offer additional therapy in select patients. This review focuses on data supporting the use of novel ultra bronchodilators, particularly in combination, and on the role for inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal and new bronchoscopic procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document