scholarly journals Molecular trade-offs in soil organic carbon composition at continental scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 687-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Hall ◽  
Chenglong Ye ◽  
Samantha R. Weintraub ◽  
William C. Hockaday
Soil Systems ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Tieh Hsu ◽  
Corey Lawrence ◽  
Matthew Winnick ◽  
John Bargar ◽  
Katharine Maher

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Purity Rima Mbaabu ◽  
Daniel Olago ◽  
Maina Gichaba ◽  
Sandra Eckert ◽  
René Eschen ◽  
...  

AbstractGrassland degradation and the concomitant loss of soil organic carbon is widespread in tropical arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Afforestation of degraded grassland, sometimes by using invasive alien trees, has been put forward as a legitimate climate change mitigation strategy. However, even in cases where tree encroachment of degraded grasslands leads to increased soil organic carbon, it may come at a high cost since the restoration of grassland-characteristic biodiversity and ecosystem services will be blocked. We assessed how invasion by Prosopis juliflora and restoration of degraded grasslands in a semi-arid region in Baringo, Kenya affected soil organic carbon, biodiversity and fodder availability. Thirty years of grassland restoration replenished soil organic carbon to 1 m depth at a rate of 1.4% per year and restored herbaceous biomass to levels of pristine grasslands, while plant biodiversity remained low. Invasion of degraded grasslands by P. juliflora increased soil organic carbon primarily in the upper 30 cm and suppressed herbaceous vegetation. We argue that, in contrast to encroachment by invasive alien trees, restoration of grasslands in tropical semi-arid regions can both serve as a measure for climate change mitigation and help restore key ecosystem services important for pastoralists and agro-pastoralist communities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 280-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastián Horacio Villarino ◽  
Guillermo Alberto Studdert ◽  
Pedro Laterra

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan G. Wynn ◽  
Michael I. Bird ◽  
Lins Vellen ◽  
Emilie Grand-Clement ◽  
John Carter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie F. von Fromm ◽  
Alison M. Hoyt ◽  
Asmeret Asefaw Berhe ◽  
Keith D. Shepherd ◽  
Tor-Gunnar Vågen ◽  
...  

<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a key component of terrestrial ecosystems. Experimental studies have shown that soil texture and geochemistry have a strong effect on carbon stocks. However, those findings primarily rely on data from temperate regions or use model approaches that are often based on limited data from tropical and sub-tropical regions.</p><p>Here, we evaluate the controls on soil carbon stocks in Africa, using a dataset of 1,580 samples. These were collected across Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) within the framework of the Africa Soil Information Service (AfSIS) project, which was built on the well-established Land Degradation Surveillance Framework (LDSF). Samples were taken from two depths (0–20 cm and 20–50 cm) at 46 LDSF sites that were stratified according to Koeppen-Geiger climate zones. The different pH-values, clay content, exchangeable cations and extractable elements across various soils of the different climatic zones (i.e. from arid to humid (sub)tropical) allow us to identify different soil and climate parameters that best explain SOC variance across SSA.</p><p>We tested if these SOC predictors differed across climatological conditions, using the ratio of potential evapotranspiration (PET) to mean annual precipitation (MAP) as indicator. For water-limited regions (PET/MAP > 1), the best predictors were climatic variables, likely because of their effect on the quantity of carbon inputs. Geochemistry dominated SOC storage in energy-limited systems (PET/MAP < 1), reflecting its effect on carbon protection. On a continental scale, climate (e.g. PET) is key to predicting SOC content in topsoil, whereas geochemistry, particularly iron-oxyhydroxides and aluminum-oxides, is more important in subsoil. Clay content had little influence on SOC at both depths. These findings contribute to an improved understanding of the controls on SOC stocks in tropical and sub-tropical regions.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Yang ◽  
Terrance Loecke ◽  
Johanness Knops

Abstract Post agricultural grasslands are considered to accumulate soil organic carbon (SOC) after cultivation cessation. The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in the U.S. is a wide scale, covering approximately 8.9 Mha as of 2020, example of row-crop to grassland conversion. To date, SOC sequestration rates, and potential, in CRP has mostly been evaluated at local scales and focused on the surface 20–30 cm of the soil profile. Thus, we lack knowledge of C sequestration rates in CRP lands on a continental scale and of C dynamics in the subsurface soil after agricultural cessation. The Rapid Carbon Assessment (RaCA) project is the most recent effort by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to systematically quantify C stock in the 0-100 cm soil profiles across the conterminous US. Here we analyze data from RaCA to evaluate the C stocks of the CRP on a continental scale of both surface and subsurface soil. We found there was no difference in SOC stock between croplands and CRP lands when comparing the 0-100 cm soil profiles, which indicates that the C sequestration in CRP lands is insignificant overall. We did find that SOC accumulated in the surface soil (0–5 cm) in CRP lands. However, theses C gains in surface (0–5 cm) soil were offset by the lower SOC stock in the subsurface (30–100 cm) of the CRP. We also found that the C: N ratio in the subsurface soil in CRP lands is lower than that of croplands, indicating a lack of labile organic matter inputs in the subsoil. Whether the lower SOC in the subsurface of CRP is caused by legacy effects or is a result of C losses needs to be verified by long-term repeated sampling in both surface and subsurface soil. This analysis highlights the importance of examining C dynamics in subsurface soil after agricultural cessation to accurately measure and improve C sequestration rates in CRP lands.


SOIL ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 305-332
Author(s):  
Sophie F. von Fromm ◽  
Alison M. Hoyt ◽  
Markus Lange ◽  
Gifty E. Acquah ◽  
Ermias Aynekulu ◽  
...  

Abstract. Soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization and destabilization has been studied intensively. Yet, the factors which control SOC content across scales remain unclear. Earlier studies demonstrated that soil texture and geochemistry strongly affect SOC content. However, those findings primarily rely on data from temperate regions where soil mineralogy, weathering status and climatic conditions generally differ from tropical and subtropical regions. We investigated soil properties and climate variables influencing SOC concentrations across sub-Saharan Africa. A total of 1601 samples were analyzed, collected from two depths (0–20 and 20–50 cm) from 17 countries as part of the Africa Soil Information Service project (AfSIS). The data set spans arid to humid climates and includes soils with a wide range of pH values, weathering status, soil texture, exchangeable cations, extractable metals and land cover types. The most important SOC predictors were identified by linear mixed-effects models, regression trees and random forest models. Our results indicate that geochemical properties, mainly oxalate-extractable metals (Al and Fe) and exchangeable Ca, are equally important compared to climatic variables (mean annual temperature and aridity index). Together, they explain approximately two-thirds of SOC variation across sub-Saharan Africa. Oxalate-extractable metals were most important in wet regions with acidic and highly weathered soils, whereas exchangeable Ca was more important in alkaline and less weathered soils in drier regions. In contrast, land cover and soil texture were not significant SOC predictors on this large scale. Our findings indicate that key factors controlling SOC across sub-Saharan Africa are broadly similar to those in temperate regions, despite differences in soil development history.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document