scholarly journals A prospective longitudinal study of performance status, an inflammation-based score (GPS) and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 1834-1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
L M Forrest ◽  
D C McMillan ◽  
C S McArdle ◽  
W J Angerson ◽  
K Dagg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

scholarly journals SURG-05. IDEAL TREATMENT REGIMEN FOR PATIENTS WITH ≥1 BRAIN METASTASIS FROM PRIMARY NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii204-ii204
Author(s):  
Karanbir Brar ◽  
Yosef Ellenbogen ◽  
Behnam Sadeghirad ◽  
Jiawen Deng ◽  
Winston Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) are common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness of treatments for BM from NSCLC. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL and references of key studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until October 2018. We also searched the Chinese databases Wanfang Data, Wanfang Med Online, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chongqing VIP Information for RCTs published until September 2019. Trials including > 10 patients were selected. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). We used a frequentist random-effects model for network meta-analysis and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS Among 8798 abstracts, 106 RCTs (9452 patients) met inclusion criteria. Median sample size was 67 (range 25-554). All trials included adult patients with histologically proven NSCLC and >1 BM proven on CT/MRI. Of trials that reported performance status (e.g. ECOG or KPS, n=67), 63/67 excluded patients with non-favorable performance status. Interventions assessed included surgery, WBRT, SRS, targeted therapies (i.e. EGFR/ALK inhibitors), and chemotherapy. Compared to WBRT alone, several interventions demonstrated a statistically significant increase in median OS, including non-targeted chemotherapy + surgery (MD: 415.3 days, 95% CI: 31.3-799.4), WBRT + EGFRi (MD: 200.2 days, 95% CI:146.3-254.1), and EGFRi alone (MD: 169.7 days, 95% CI: 49.7-289.7). Among all interventions, only WBRT + EGFRi showed a significant improvement in median PFS (MD: 108.0 days, 95%CI: 48.5-167.5). CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary analyses indicate an OS and PFS benefit on the addition of EGFR inhibitors to WBRT for the treatment of BMs from NSCLC. Further analyses of hazard ratios for OS/PFS are underway, and subgroup analyses are planned. These data support the growing role of targeted therapies in the treatment of BMs, particularly in susceptible mutant tumours.

Efficacy and toxicity hypofractionated radiotherapy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Tanzeel Janjua ◽  
Fei Sun ◽  
Katy Clarke ◽  
Pete Dickinson ◽  
Kevin Franks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Lung Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Abstract Aim: Centrally located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in patients who are unfit for surgery are treated with fractionated radiotherapy. We present the outcomes of a moderately hypofractionated accelerated dose regimen of 50 Gy in 15 fractions from a single centre in the UK. Materials and methods: Electronic case notes and radiotherapy records of lung cancer patients treated between January 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 score was used to evaluate comorbidities. Mean lung doses and percentage of lung receiving more than 20 Gy were calculated for all patients. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan–Meier curves. Results: Fifty-three patients were included in the study; the median follow-up was 20.2 months. 87% of patients had stage I disease. There was no 30-day post-treatment mortality. Ninety-day mortality rate after radiotherapy was 3.8%. Grade 2 pneumonitis was seen in five patients while no grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis was observed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18.5 months and 28.2 months, respectively. The estimated 1 and 2 years PFS were 62.3% and 41.3%, respectively, and OS were 77.4% and 56.6%, respectively. Worsening performance status was associated with worse survival on cox regression analysis. Disease relapsed in 36% of patients. 7.5% of patients with relapsed disease had infield recurrence. Findings: 50 Gy in 15 fractions radiotherapy for central early-stage lung cancer is a feasible choice that requires further randomised trials.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Severe Diarrhea with an Afatinib Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Trials

Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Hopkins ◽  
Anh-Minh Nguyen ◽  
Christos Karapetis ◽  
Andrew Rowland ◽  
Michael Sorich
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Severe Diarrhea

Afatinib is an effective therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but it is associated with a relatively high incidence of severe diarrhea. The association between pre-treatment candidate predictors (age, sex, race, performance status, renal function, hemoglobin, and measures of body mass) and severe (grade ≥ 3) diarrhea was evaluated using logistic regression with pooled individual participant data from seven clinical studies. A risk score was developed based on the count of major risk factors. Overall, 184 of 1151 participants (16%) experienced severe diarrhea with use of afatinib. Body weight, body mass index, and body surface area all exhibited a prominent non-linear association where risk increased markedly at the lower range (p < 0.005). Low weight (<45 kg), female sex, and older age (≥60 years) were identified as major independent risk factors (p < 0.01). Each risk factor was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of severe diarrhea, and this was consistent between individuals commenced on 40 mg or 50 mg afatinib. A simple risk score based on the count of these risk factors identifies individuals at lowest and highest risk (C-statistic of 0.65). Risk of severe diarrhea for individuals commenced on 40 mg afatinib ranged from 6% for individuals with no risk factors to 33% for individuals with all three risk factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document