scholarly journals Local or systemic metronidazole with scaling and root planing does not increase clinical attachment level

2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Richard Niederman
Keyword(s):  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
Attachment Level ◽  
Systemic Metronidazole

scholarly journals Laser Assisted Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Double Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Everett ◽  
Jeffrey A. Rossmann ◽  
David G. Kerns ◽  
Ibtisam Al-Hashimi
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Attachment Level

The objective of this study was to examine potential benefits of using laser therapy for secular decontamination in conjunction with scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. The study was performed on 173 teeth in 14 patients in a split-mouth design, one side received scaling and root planing followed by laser therapy using a carbon dioxide (CO2) laser with an ablative handpiece (test group); the contralateral side received scaling and root planing without laser (control group). Clinical and laboratory parameters were evaluated prior to treatment and at 3 and 6 months following therapy; clinical measurements were performed by two blinded examiners. The clinical parameters included measurement of gingival recession (REC), bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD), furcation involvement (FUR), and tooth mobility (MOB). Laboratory testing to determine the levels of periodontal pathogens was performed using PCR techniques. The results of the study revealed statistically significant differences in clinical and laboratory parameters at 3 and 6 months after therapy for both test and control groups, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups. However, sites receiving laser therapy tended to show a greater decrease in probing depths, gain in clinical attachment level, and reduced bacterial levels. In conclusion, the overall results of the study suggest a potential benefit of using laser therapy in conjunction with scaling and root planing for the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

scholarly journals Does adjunctive use of metronidazole plus amoxicillin benefit patients receiving non-surgical scaling and root planing for the treatment of generalised aggressive periodontitis?

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre W. Van Zyl ◽  
Johan Hartshorne ◽  
Alonso Carrasco-Labra
Keyword(s):  
Test Group ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Aggressive Periodontitis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
One Year ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Attachment Level

This article describes a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial thatinvolved 30 eligible subjects experiencing generalised aggressive periodontitis. Subjectswere randomly assigned to either the test group (scaling and root planing + metronidazole[400 mg]) and amoxicillin [500 mg]) or the control group (scaling and root planing withoutthe adjunctive antibiotics combination). Both antibiotics and placebos were administeredthree times per day for 14 days. Participants were examined at baseline, and again six monthsand one year after therapy. Both therapies led to a statistically significant improvementin all clinical parameters as measured after one year. However, subjects who received themetronidazole–amoxicillin combination showed the greatest reduction in mean probingdepth, an improved clinical attachment level and a lower mean number of residual sitesafter one year. The investigators concluded that the non-surgical treatment of generalisedaggressive periodontitis was markedly improved by the adjunctive use of metronidazole andamoxicillin up to one year after treatment.

scholarly journals Systemic use of metronidazole in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a pilot study using clinical, microbiological, and enzymatic evaluation

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solange Alonso Vergani ◽  
Emílio Barbosa e Silva ◽  
Adriana Helena Vinholis ◽  
Rosemary Adriana Chiérici Marcantonio
Keyword(s):  
Periodontal Disease ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Group I ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Chronic Periodontal Disease ◽  
Attachment Level ◽  
Systemic Metronidazole

The aim of the present parallel, double-blind investigation was to evaluate the effect of using systemic metronidazole alone or associated to scaling and root planing on adult chronic periodontal disease, monitored at baseline, 30, 60 and 90 days. Twelve subjects were divided into three groups: the first group (Group I - 22 sites) was submitted to scaling and root planing (SRP) alone; the second group (Group II - 30 sites) received SRP and 250 mg of metronidazole (3 times a day for 10 days), and the third group (Group III - 31 sites) was treated with metronidazole alone. The clinical parameters evaluated were probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PlI), gingival index (GI) and bleeding upon probing (BP). Microbiological (BANA test) and enzymatic (Pocket Watch) tests were also performed. All three proposed treatments produced significant improvements in clinical conditions of subjects, from baseline, 30, 60 and 90-day period, except for clinical attachment level. The results obtained by microbiological and enzymatic tests did not show statistical differences among the groups for the 90-day period (r = 0.7924 and r = 0.7757, respectively). In relation to clinical parameters, statistical differences among groups were observed only for the gingival index (p = 0.0261) between Groups I and II, and probing depth (p = 0.0124) between Group I and the others. We conclude that the use of systemic metronidazole did not produce additional effects on the microbiological conditions of these patients with chronic periodontal disease.

Comparison of Clinical Attachment Level Gain Using Scaling Root Planing Versus Adjunctive Azithromycin on Chronic Periodontitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2054-2056
Author(s):  
Attique ur Rehman ◽  
Marryam Riaz ◽  
Moeez Ansari ◽  
Saqib Naeem Sidiqui ◽  
Adeel Ijaz Rana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality ◽  
Periodontal Debridement ◽  
Attachment Level

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the mean clinical attachment gain in patients of chronic periodontitis after scaling and root alone versus Azithromycin as an adjunct to scaling and root. Study Design Comparative study Place and Duration: Conducted at Operative Dentistry Department, Azra Naheed Dental College, Lahore for a duration of 4 months from December 2019 to March 2020. Methodology: Total Sixty patients fulfilling the selection criteria were randomly allocated to SRP and SRP+Az groups. In both groups, conventional scaling and root planing was done. In the SRP group placebo capsules were prescribed, while in the SRP+Az group, Azithromycin (500mg) once daily was prescribed for 3 days. Clinical attachment level (CAL) was measured initially and after 5 weeks. Data was analyzed in SPSS version 19.0 using independent sample t-test. Results: Both groups showed gain in CAL compared to baseline. However, SRP+Az group showed significantly more gain in CAL in comparison to SRP group (P value < 0.05). Conclusion: Use of Azithromycin adjunctive to SRP is an effective treatment modality in chronic periodontitis patients. Keywords: Anti‐Bacterial Agents, Azithromycin, Chronic periodontitis, Clinical attachment level, Periodontal Debridement, Scaling and root planing,

scholarly journals Efficacy of glycine powder air-polishing combined with scaling and root planing in the treatment of periodontitis and halitosis: A randomised clinical study

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 1168-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Caygur ◽  
Mohammed R. Albaba ◽  
Atilla Berberoglu ◽  
Hasan Guney Yilmaz
Keyword(s):  
Plaque Index ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Gingival Index ◽  
Pocket Depth ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Bleeding On Probing ◽  
Air Polishing ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
Attachment Level ◽  
Time Point

Introduction This study was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of using the Perio-Flow device (Electro Medical Systems, Nyon, Switzerland) adjunctively with mechanical instrumentation on periodontal parameters and halitosis. Materials and Methods Sixty patients who presented with a 4- to 6-mm probing pocket depth were recruited for the study. Patients were randomly assigned to scaling and root planing (SRP) or SRP + glycine powder air-polishing (GPAP). For both groups, the plaque index, gingival index, pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and clinical attachment level scores were recorded at baseline and 1 month. Volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) were measured by a Halimeter (Interscan Corp., Chatsworth, CA, USA) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 7, 14, and 30 days. Results Both groups showed significantly lower plaque index, gingival index, pocket depth, bleeding on probing, and clinical attachment level gain scores at 1 month than at baseline. No significant differences were found between the groups at any time point. The VSCs were significantly different at 1 month compared with baseline in both groups. However, the intergroup comparisons of VSCs were not statistically significant at any time point. Conclusion Within the limits of this study, SRP is effective for treatment of periodontitis and halitosis. However, using GPAP adjunctively with mechanical instrumentation has no beneficial effects on halitosis or periodontal parameters.

scholarly journals Efficacy of 2% ibuprofen subgingival irrigation as an adjunct to non-surgical therapy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A randomized controlled, split-mouth, clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Amirhossein Farahmand ◽  
Ferena Sayar ◽  
Zohreh Omidali ◽  
Mahsa Soleimani ◽  
Bahareh Jafarzadeh Esfahani
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
Periodontal Treatment ◽  
Periodontal Pocket ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Pocket Depth ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Attachment Level

Background. Pharmacological factors, such as ibuprofen, released topically in the periodontal pocket modulate the host response and enhance the influence of non-surgical periodontal treatment. Methods. In this double-blind, randomized, split-mouth, clinical trial, 38 outpatients with mild to moderate chronic periodontitis were enrolled by applying the simple random sampling method. They had at least one tooth with a periodontal pocket depth of >4 mm in each quadrant and had undergone phase I of periodontal treatment one week after scaling and root planing (SRP). The parameters of clinical periodontal evaluation, including probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), and bleeding index (BI), were measured. In addition, two mandibular molar teeth in one quadrant were randomly nominated for subgingival irrigation with 0.5 mL of 2% ibuprofen or placebo mouthwash. The measurements were repeated after at least one week for three months. Results. Thirty-four individuals (18 women and 16 men), with an age range of 28‒36 years, were evaluated for three months. Moreover, periodontal clinical parameters were assessed within three months. There was a significant improvement in pocket depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) readings after 12 weeks in both groups (paired t-test). On comparing, the group with scaling and root planing (SRP) + ibuprofen showed more favorable results than the group with SRP + placebo (P<0.05). There were significant improvements in PI and BI in both groups; the differences between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. The mouthwashes containing ibuprofen might reduce the symptoms of periodontal disease and might be used as an adjunct in the healing process

scholarly journals Clinical Effects of the Local Drug Delivery Of 0.5% Azithromycin Gel in Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis Among Smokers Versus Non Smokers

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 094-103
Author(s):  
Jasmine Kaur ◽  
Viniti Goel ◽  
Ranjan Malhotra ◽  
Vishakha Grover
Keyword(s):  
Drug Delivery ◽  
Chronic Periodontitis ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Local Drug Delivery ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Pocket Depth ◽  
Clinical Attachment Level ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
Attachment Level

Abstract Background: Along with conventional periodontal surgical therapy, local delivery of antibiotics may provide more effective treatment in smokers by targeting tissue-invasive bacteria. The aim of this randomized, clinical trial was to evaluate the adjunctive effects of subgingivally delivered 0.5% azithromycin (AZM) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis in smokers versus non smokers. Methods: 38 sites in patients of chronic periodontitis were randomized and categorized into two treatment groups: Group 1 consisted of 19 sites in patients who were smokers and Group 2 consisted of 19 sites in non smokers, who received Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) plus 0.5% azithromycin gel Local drug delivery. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 1 and 2 months. They included probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) and percentage bone fill. Results: Azithromycin resulted in significant improvements in both the groups. Mean decrease in PD in non smokers by the end of 2 months was 3.903mm and in smokers was 3.917mm. Gain in CAL in non smokers by the end of 2 months was 3.879mm and in smokers it was 3.920mm. Mean bone fill at one month for smokers was 15.86% and was 26.58% at 2 months. In non-smokers the mean bone fill was 17.19% at 1 month and 24.03% at 2 months. Conclusions: When compared to the non smokers, the adjunctive use of 0.5% AZM resulted in similar improvement in clinical outcome in the treatment of chronic periodontitis among smokers. Local drug delivery of Azithromycin gel contributed to decrease in probing pocket depth, gain in clinical attachment level and in alveolar bone. The apparent bone regeneration also raises the intriguing possibility that Azithromycin encourages bone formation once tissue inflammation has subsided.

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY AS AN ADJUNCT TO NON – SURGICAL PERIODONTAL THERAPY IN TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENT

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshni Ghosh ◽  
Pradeep Shukla ◽  
Gaurav Malhotra ◽  
Prerna Kataria ◽  
Preeti Shukla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Scaling And Root Planing ◽  
Root Planing ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Attachment Level

Background: To Evaluate the additional benefit of Antimicrobial Photodynamic therapy, if any in the glycemic control of type 2 diabetes mellitus  chronic periodontitis patients . Methods:  Fifty  diabetic patients with chronic periodontitis were taken for the study who met the inclusion criteria of clinical attachment loss ?3 to 5 mm at ? 30% of sites and bleeding on probing present in two different quadrants . After SRP ( Scaling and root planing ) , one quadrant was selected for aPDT while other served as a control group. Clinical parameters i.e. Plaque index, Probing depth ,Relative attachment level and HBA1c were measured at baseline, 1 week , 1month and 3 months. Results: Statistically significant differences in the mean probing depth, Relative attachment level, plaque deposit, and HBA1c were found between baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment for both groups. No significant differences in glucose levels were detected among the two  groups in 1 week . Reduction in the mean HbA1c level after treatment was observed in both groups in 1 month and 3 months . Conclusion:  Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy when used in addition to scaling and root planing yields significant improvement of  mean probing depth , Plaque deposit ,Relative attachment levels,  periodontal status and reduction of HbA1c levels in treatment of diabetic patients with periodontitis when comparing the test group to the control group. Keywords: photodynamic therapy , scaling and root planing, glycated haemoglobin ,Randomized controlled trial

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document