scholarly journals Nutritional deficiency in Dutch primary care: data from general practice research and registration networks

2005 ◽  
Vol 59 (S1) ◽  
pp. S187-S194 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A M van Wayenburg ◽  
F A van de Laar ◽  
M W M de Waal ◽  
I M Okkes ◽  
M van den Akker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Nutritional Deficiency ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Primary Care Data

scholarly journals Mental Illness in Primary Care Settings

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Social Security ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Primary Care Settings

A Conference on the above topic took place at the Institute of Psychiatry, London, on 17 and 18 July 1984. The Conference was sponsored by the Department of Health and Social Security and was organized by the General Practice Research Unit. Over 100 invited clinicians, research workers and policy-makers took part. The majority of the participants were either psychiatrists or general practitioners, but representatives of all relevant disciplines attended.

scholarly journals Forthcoming Events

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-60
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Future Trends ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Research And Policy

The Department of Health and Social Security is sponsoring a conference on ‘Mental Illness in Primary Care Settings’ which will be held at the Institute of Psychiatry on 17 and 18 July 1984. The conference is being organized by the General Practice Research Unit. Topics will include classification, screening, treatment effectiveness, patterns of collaboration, international developments and future trends for research and policy. Although attendance will be by invitation only, limited places may be available. Those interested should contact Dr D. G. Wilkinson, General Practice Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ, from whom further information is available.

scholarly journals Do GPs accurately record date of death? A UK observational analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e24-e24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Harshfield ◽  
Gary A Abel ◽  
Stephen Barclay ◽  
Rupert A Payne
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
National Statistics ◽  
Primary Care Data ◽  
National Mortality ◽  
General Practices

ObjectiveTo examine the concordance between dates of death recorded in UK primary care and national mortality records.MethodsUK primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink were linked to Office for National Statistics (ONS) data, for 118 571 patients who died between September 2010 and September 2015. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with discrepancy in death dates between data sets.ResultsDeath dates matched in 76.8% of cases with primary care dates preceding ONS date in 2.9%, and following in 20.3% of cases; 92.2% of cases differed by <2 weeks. Primary care date was >4 weeks later than ONS in 1.5% of cases and occurred more frequently with deaths categorised as ‘external’ (15.8% vs 0.8% for cancer), and in younger patients (15.9% vs 1% for 18–29 and 80–89 years, respectively). General practices with the greatest discrepancies (97.5th percentile) had around 200 times higher odds of recording substantially discordant dates than practices with the lowest discrepancies (2.5th percentile).ConclusionDates of death in primary care records often disagree with national records and should be treated with caution. There is marked variation between practices, and studies involving young patients, unexplained deaths and where precise date of death is important are particularly vulnerable to these issues.

A Review of the Use of Routine Data on CHD in General Practice Research in Scotland

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
G McLean
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Routine Data ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Primary Care Research ◽  
Care Research ◽  
Extensive Range

Background: The primary aim of the Platform Project is to maximise the use of routine data for-primary care research in Scotland. Aims: To assess the extent to which routine data ts available and has been used in studies on CHD in General Practice research in Scotland. To assess the advantages and limitations of using routine data in this setting Methods: Literature review using a variety of databases catalogues and websites, bibliographies of articles retrieved and searching through journals by hand not available electronically. Results: This review has found that the use of routine data in CHD studies in General Practice research in Scotland remains small. There has been little work undertaken which has combined the use of routine data with other research methods. Limitations with routine data exist particularly with regard to risk factors and ethnicity. However, despite such limitations there exists an increasingly extensive range of data, which exists to help explain tends in CHD, which so far has been largely underused.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document