Generation of a histidine-tagged antibotulinum toxin antibody fragment in E. coli : effects of post-induction temperature on yield and IMAC binding-affinity

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
W E Bentley ◽  
R D Madurawe ◽  
R T Gill ◽  
M Shiloach ◽  
T E Chase ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystyna Ślaska-Kiss ◽  
Nikolett Zsibrita ◽  
Mihály Koncz ◽  
Pál Albert ◽  
Ákos Csábrádi ◽  
...  

AbstractTargeted DNA methylation is a technique that aims to methylate cytosines in selected genomic loci. In the most widely used approach a CG-specific DNA methyltransferase (MTase) is fused to a sequence specific DNA binding protein, which binds in the vicinity of the targeted CG site(s). Although the technique has high potential for studying the role of DNA methylation in higher eukaryotes, its usefulness is hampered by insufficient methylation specificity. One of the approaches proposed to suppress methylation at unwanted sites is to use MTase variants with reduced DNA binding affinity. In this work we investigated how methylation specificity of chimeric MTases containing variants of the CG-specific prokaryotic MTase M.SssI fused to zinc finger or dCas9 targeting domains is influenced by mutations affecting catalytic activity and/or DNA binding affinity of the MTase domain. Specificity of targeted DNA methylation was assayed in E. coli harboring a plasmid with the target site. Digestions of the isolated plasmids with methylation sensitive restriction enzymes revealed that specificity of targeted DNA methylation was dependent on the activity but not on the DNA binding affinity of the MTase. These results have implications for the design of strategies of targeted DNA methylation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1918-1925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso J. C. Soler Bistué ◽  
Hongphuc Ha ◽  
Renee Sarno ◽  
Michelle Don ◽  
Angeles Zorreguieta ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The dissemination of AAC(6′)-I-type acetyltransferases have rendered amikacin and other aminoglycosides all but useless in some parts of the world. Antisense technologies could be an alternative to extend the life of these antibiotics. External guide sequences are short antisense oligoribonucleotides that induce RNase P-mediated cleavage of a target RNA by forming a precursor tRNA-like complex. Thirteen-nucleotide external guide sequences complementary to locations within five regions accessible for interaction with antisense oligonucleotides in the mRNA that encodes AAC(6′)-Ib were analyzed. While small variations in the location targeted by different external guide sequences resulted in big changes in efficiency of binding to native aac(6′)-Ib mRNA, most of them induced high levels of RNase P-mediated cleavage in vitro. Recombinant plasmids coding for selected external guide sequences were introduced into Escherichia coli harboring aac(6′)-Ib, and the transformant strains were tested to determine their resistance to amikacin. The two external guide sequences that showed the strongest binding efficiency to the mRNA in vitro, EGSC3 and EGSA2, interfered with expression of the resistance phenotype at different degrees. Growth curve experiments showed that E. coli cells harboring a plasmid coding for EGSC3, the external guide sequence with the highest mRNA binding affinity in vitro, did not grow for at least 300 min in the presence of 15 μg of amikacin/ml. EGSA2, which had a lower mRNA-binding affinity in vitro than EGSC3, inhibited the expression of amikacin resistance at a lesser level; growth of E. coli harboring a plasmid coding for EGSA2, in the presence of 15 μg of amikacin/ml was undetectable for 200 min but reached an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5 after 5 h of incubation. Our results indicate that the use of external guide sequences could be a viable strategy to preserve the efficacy of amikacin.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1157-1157
Author(s):  
Tao Zhen ◽  
Tongyi Dou ◽  
Yun Chen ◽  
Wei Yang ◽  
Jiansen Jiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Inversion of chromosome 16 is a consistent finding in patients with acute myeloid leukemia subtype M4 with eosinophilia (AML M4Eo), which generates a CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene. We recently showed that RUNX1 is indispensable for Cbfb-MYH11-induced leukemogenesis in a mouse model. We found that RUNX1 interacted with CBFβ-SMMHC, the fusion protein encoded by CBFB-MYH11, to directly regulate critical genes for leukemogenesis (Zhen et al., Blood, 2020). However, our current understanding of the interaction between CBFβ-SMMHC and RUNX1 does not provide adequate explanation on how the RUNX1-CBFβ-SMMHC complex forms and how the complex interacts with DNA for leukemogenesis as CBFβ-SMMHC without the RUNX1 high-affinity-binding-domain (CBFβ-SMMHC-ΔHABD) is also able to induce leukemia while CBFβ-SMMHC with mutations in the C-terminal multimerization domain (CBFβ-SMMHC-mDE) is not able to induce leukemia in mice. To address this question, we used RHD domain of RUNX1, CBFβ, CBFβ-SMMHC, CBFβ-SMMHC-ΔHABD and CBFβ-SMMHC-mDE proteins, which were purified from E. coli overexpressing these proteins, to explore how the HABD and DE domains affect the interactions between CBFβ-SMMHC, RHD and RUNX1-target DNA Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) and negative staining. As expected, deletion of the HABD domain significantly reduced CBFβ-SMMHC's binding affinity to RHD by BLI assay. Interestingly, differences in binding affinity between RHD and different versions of CBFβ-SMMHC did not correlate with their leukemogenic capability. On the other hand, the binding affinity between RHD and its target oligo was more significantly enhanced by CBFβ-SMMHC and CBFβ-SMMHC-ΔHABD that can induce leukemia than CBFβ-SMMHC-DE, which cannot. We also found that both CBFβ-SMMHC and CBFβ-SMMHC-ΔHABD, but not CBFβ-SMMHC-mDE, could form a filament structure by negative staining, suggesting the filament formation ability is important for leukemogenesis by CBFβ-SMMHC. In addition, RHD reduces filament formation by CBFβ-SMMHC, which was overcome when target oligo was added. In contrast, RHD could not inhibit filament formation by CBFβ-SMMHC-ΔHABD, suggesting that HABD interaction is required for RHD to disrupt filament formation by CBFβ-SMMHC. Overall, we found that leukemogenic capability of CBFβ-SMMHC correlates with its ability to enhance binding between RHD and its target DNA and to form multimerized filaments. The results also suggest that HABD and DE domains of CBFβ-SMMHC are required for the formation of the RUNX1-CBFβ-SMMHC complex with higher binding affinity to target DNA. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matías Gutiérrez-González ◽  
Camila Farías ◽  
Samantha Tello ◽  
Diana Pérez-Etcheverry ◽  
Alfonso Romero ◽  
...  

AbstractRecombinant protein expression for structural and therapeutic applications requires the use of systems with high expression yields. Escherichia coli is considered the workhorse for this purpose, given its fast growth rate and feasible manipulation. However, bacterial inclusion body formation remains a challenge for further protein purification. We analyzed and optimized the expression conditions for three different proteins: an anti-MICA scFv, MICA, and p19 subunit of IL-23. We used a response surface methodology based on a three-level Box-Behnken design, which included three factors: post-induction temperature, post-induction time and IPTG concentration. Comparing this information with soluble protein data in a principal component analysis revealed that insoluble and soluble proteins have different optimal conditions for post-induction temperature, post-induction time, IPTG concentration and in amino acid sequence features. Finally, we optimized the refolding conditions of the least expressed protein, anti-MICA scFv, using a fast dilution protocol with different additives, obtaining soluble and active scFv for binding assays. These results allowed us to obtain higher yields of proteins expressed in inclusion bodies. Further studies using the system proposed in this study may lead to the identification of optimal environmental factors for a given protein sequence, favoring the acceleration of bioprocess development and structural studies.


1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1025-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clark E. Hartsock ◽  
Jeffrey K. Lewis ◽  
Ian Leslie ◽  
Joseph A. Pope ◽  
Larry B. Tsai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document