scholarly journals Neurobiology of the stress response early in life: evolution of a concept and the role of corticotropin releasing hormone

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
K L Brunson ◽  
S Avishai-Eliner ◽  
C G Hatalski ◽  
T Z Baram
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-223
Author(s):  
E. V. Sukhareva

Stress is an essential part of everyday life. The neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH, also called CRF and corticoliberin) plays a key role in the integration of neuroendocrine, autonomic and behavioral responses to stress. The activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis) by neurons of the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (PVN), the primary site of synthesis CRH, triggers stress reactions. In addition to the hypothalamus, CRH is widespread in extrahypothalamic brain structures, where it functions as a neuromodulator for coordination and interaction between the humoral and behavioral aspects of a stress response. The axons of neurons expressing CRH are directed to various structures of the brain, where the neuropeptide interacts with specific receptors (CRHR1, CRHR2) and can affect various mediator systems that work together to transmit signals to different brain regions to cause many reactions to stress. Moreover, the effect of stress on brain functions varies from behavioral adaptation to increased survival and increased risk of developing mental disorders. Disturbances of the CRH system regulation are directly related to such disorders: mental pathologies (depression, anxiety, addictions), deviations of neuroendocrinological functions, inflammation, as well as the onset and development of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, the role of CRH as a regulator of the neurons structure in the areas of the developing and mature brain has been established. To date, studies have been conducted in which CRHR1 is a target for antidepressants, which are, in fact, antagonists of this receptor. In this regard, the study of the participation of the CRH system and its receptors in negative effects on hormone-dependent systems, as well as the possibility of preventing them, is a promising task of modern physiological genetics. In this review, attention will be paid to the role of CRH in the regulation of response to stress, as well as to the involvement of extrahypothalamic CRH in pathophysiology and the correction of mental disorders.


2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Lerche ◽  
M Willem ◽  
K Kleinknecht ◽  
C Romberg ◽  
U Konietzko ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Pearl La Marca-Ghaemmaghami ◽  
Sara M. Dainese ◽  
Roberto La Marca ◽  
Roland Zimmermann ◽  
Ulrike Ehlert

Neoplasma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Qin Yi ◽  
Jia-Xing An ◽  
Cheng-Cheng Liao ◽  
Sha Lei ◽  
Hai Jin ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 368-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Webster ◽  
I J Elenkov ◽  
G P Chrousos

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A115-A116
Author(s):  
B C Satterfield ◽  
I Anlap ◽  
S L Esbit ◽  
W D Killgore

Abstract Introduction Dynamic decision processes requiring flexible updating of information are impaired by stress and sleep loss, both of which activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) stress response. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) initiates the HPA pathway. The CRH receptor (CRHR1) gene contains a single nucleotide polymorphism that modulates this response. We investigated whether cognitive flexibility is affected by CRHR1 polymorphism following a night of acute stress and total sleep deprivation (TSD). Methods N=46 healthy, young adults (21.8±3.4y; 21 females) participated in an in-laboratory 31h sleep deprivation study. Beginning at 19:30 until 07:30, the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) was administered every 4h. The MAST alternates a cold pressor task with an oral subtraction task five times in a single bout. At 29h wakefulness, subjects performed a novel go/no-go reversal learning task. Stimulus-response rules were presented at the beginning of the task, and subjects were asked to either respond or withhold a response to the presented stimuli while receiving accuracy feedback. Halfway through the task, the stimulus-response rules were reversed. Performance was assessed by discriminability index (d’), hit rate (HR), and false alarm rate (FAR). Saliva samples were collected immediately prior, immediately after, and 30min after each MAST and assayed for cortisol. One saliva sample from each subject was assayed for CRHR1 genotype. Results CRHR1 genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ 2=2.97, p=0.08). Mixed effects ANOVA with fixed effects of CRHR1 genotype, pre/post-reversal, and their interaction found a significant CRHR1 by reversal interaction for d’ (F2,319=3.88, p=0.022) and HR (F2,319=3.16, p=0.044) following a night of stress and TSD. No such interaction was found at well-rested baseline (d’: F2,319=2.51, p=0.083; HR: F2,319=1.55, p=0.213). Subjects homozygous for the T allele had higher mean post-MAST cortisol levels (0.40±0.06 µg/dL) with better pre-reversal performance, but worse post-reversal performance compared to heterozygous and homozygous G allele carriers. Conclusion CRHR1 genotype modulates dynamic decision making following a night of acute stress and TSD. A higher cortisol stress response (T/T genotype) is beneficial to maintaining task relevant information (stability), but significantly impairs the ability to update task-relevant information following a change in situational demands (flexibility). Support CDMRP grant W81XWH-17-C-0088


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document