scholarly journals Conformational H-bonding modulation of the iron active site cysteine ligand of superoxide reductase: absorption and resonance Raman studies

Author(s):  
Alain Desbois ◽  
Julien Valton ◽  
Yohann Moreau ◽  
Stéphane Torelli ◽  
Vincent Nivière

Superoxide reductase Asn117 residue, by making hydrogen bonds with neighboring residues, enables fine-tuning of the Fe–S(Cys116) bond strength.

2007 ◽  
Vol 282 (30) ◽  
pp. 22207-22216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Mathé ◽  
Claire O. Weill ◽  
Tony A. Mattioli ◽  
Catherine Berthomieu ◽  
Chantal Houée-Levin ◽  
...  

Biochemistry ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (31) ◽  
pp. 9833-9841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Clay ◽  
Francis E. Jenney ◽  
Hak Joon Noh ◽  
Peter L. Hagedoorn ◽  
Michael W. W. Adams ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (08) ◽  
pp. 1341002 ◽  
Author(s):  
XIN ZHANG ◽  
MING LEI

The deamination process of isoxanthopterin catalyzed by isoxanthopterin deaminase was determined using the combined QM(PM3)/MM molecular dynamics simulations. In this paper, the updated PM3 parameters were employed for zinc ions and the initial model was built up based on the crystal structure. Proton transfer and following steps have been investigated in two paths: Asp336 and His285 serve as the proton shuttle, respectively. Our simulations showed that His285 is more effective than Aap336 in proton transfer for deamination of isoxanthopterin. As hydrogen bonds between the substrate and surrounding residues play a key role in nucleophilic attack, we suggested mutating Thr195 to glutamic acid, which could enhance the hydrogen bonds and help isoxanthopterin get close to the active site. The simulations which change the substrate to pterin 6-carboxylate also performed for comparison. Our results provide reference for understanding of the mechanism of deaminase and for enhancing the deamination rate of isoxanthopterin deaminase.


1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 934-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. L. Erve ◽  
Elisabeth Barofsky ◽  
Douglas F. Barofsky ◽  
Max L. Deinzer ◽  
Donald J. Reed

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solveig Gaarn Olesen ◽  
Steen Hammerum

It is generally expected that the hydrogen bond strength in a D–H•••A adduct is predicted by the difference between the proton affinities (Δ PA) of D and A, measured by the adduct stabilization, and demonstrated by the infrared (IR) redshift of the D–H bond stretching vibrational frequency. These criteria do not always yield consistent predictions, as illustrated by the hydrogen bonds formed by the E and Z OH groups of protonated carboxylic acids. The Δ PA and the stabilization of a series of hydrogen bonded adducts indicate that the E OH group forms the stronger hydrogen bonds, whereas the bond length changes and the redshift favor the Z OH group, matching the results of NBO and AIM calculations. This reflects that the thermochemistry of adduct formation is not a good measure of the hydrogen bond strength in charged adducts, and that the ionic interactions in the E and Z adducts of protonated carboxylic acids are different. The OH bond length and IR redshift afford the better measure of hydrogen bond strength.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document