scholarly journals Modulation of amyloid-β aggregation by metal complexes with a dual binding mode and their delivery across the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Vilar ◽  
Tiffany G Chan ◽  
Carmen Ruehl ◽  
Sophie Morse ◽  
Michelle Simon ◽  
...  

One of the key hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease is the aggregation of the amyloid-β peptide to form fibrils. Consequently, there has been great interest in studying molecules that can disrupt...

2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 303-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmina B Mackic ◽  
James Bading ◽  
Jorge Ghiso ◽  
Larry Walker ◽  
Thomas Wisniewski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
So Hee Park ◽  
Kyoungwon Baik ◽  
Seun Jeon ◽  
Won Seok Chang ◽  
Byoung Seok Ye ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Focused ultrasound (FUS)-mediated blood–brain barrier (BBB) opening has shown efficacy in removal of amyloid plaque and improvement of cognitive functions in preclinical studies, but this is rarely reported in clinical studies. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety, feasibility and potential benefits of repeated extensive BBB opening. Methods In this open-label, prospective study, six patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were enrolled at Severance Hospital in Korea between August 2020 and September 2020. Five of them completed the study. FUS-mediated BBB opening, targeting the bilateral frontal lobe regions over 20 cm3, was performed twice at three-month intervals. Magnetic resonance imaging, 18F-Florbetaben (FBB) positron emission tomography, Caregiver-Administered Neuropsychiatric Inventory (CGA-NPI) and comprehensive neuropsychological tests were performed before and after the procedures. Results FUS targeted a mean volume of 21.1 ± 2.7 cm3 and BBB opening was confirmed at 95.7% ± 9.4% of the targeted volume. The frontal-to-other cortical region FBB standardized uptake value ratio at 3 months after the procedure showed a slight decrease, which was statistically significant, compared to the pre-procedure value (− 1.6%, 0.986 vs1.002, P = 0.043). The CGA-NPI score at 2 weeks after the second procedure significantly decreased compared to baseline (2.2 ± 3.0 vs 8.6 ± 6.0, P = 0.042), but recovered after 3 months (5.2 ± 5.8 vs 8.6 ± 6.0, P = 0.89). No adverse effects were observed. Conclusions The repeated and extensive BBB opening in the frontal lobe is safe and feasible for patients with AD. In addition, the BBB opening is potentially beneficial for amyloid removal in AD patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wang ◽  
Fanglian Chen ◽  
Zhaoli Han ◽  
Zhenyu Yin ◽  
Xintong Ge ◽  
...  

Amyloid-β (Aβ) is the predominant pathologic protein in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The production and deposition of Aβ are important factors affecting AD progression and prognosis. The deposition of neurotoxic Aβ contributes to damage of the blood–brain barrier. However, the BBB is also crucial in maintaining the normal metabolism of Aβ, and dysfunction of the BBB aggravates Aβ deposition. This review characterizes Aβ deposition and BBB damage in AD, summarizes their interactions, and details their respective mechanisms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-493
Author(s):  
Madelaine Lynch ◽  
Stefan Heinen ◽  
Kelly Markham-Coultes ◽  
Meaghan O'Reilly ◽  
Paul Van Slyke ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 214 (11) ◽  
pp. 3151-3169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Montagne ◽  
Zhen Zhao ◽  
Berislav V. Zlokovic

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) keeps neurotoxic plasma-derived components, cells, and pathogens out of the brain. An early BBB breakdown and/or dysfunction have been shown in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) before dementia, neurodegeneration and/or brain atrophy occur. However, the role of BBB breakdown in neurodegenerative disorders is still not fully understood. Here, we examine BBB breakdown in animal models frequently used to study the pathophysiology of AD, including transgenic mice expressing human amyloid-β precursor protein, presenilin 1, and tau mutations, and apolipoprotein E, the strongest genetic risk factor for AD. We discuss the role of BBB breakdown and dysfunction in neurodegenerative process, pitfalls in BBB measurements, and how targeting the BBB can influence the course of neurological disorder. Finally, we comment on future approaches and models to better define, at the cellular and molecular level, the underlying mechanisms between BBB breakdown and neurodegeneration as a basis for developing new therapies for BBB repair to control neurodegeneration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document