Spreading the Word Through Letters to the Editor

ASHA Leader ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Cerquone

A letter to the editor is one way you can spread the word about your expertise and profession.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 792-792
Author(s):  
INGEBORG KRIEGER

Dr. Robbins' comments in his letter to the editor offer certainly an attractive explanation for the phenomena observed in bronchiolitis, although Engel's opinion concerning the functional significance of the bronchiolar muscles is not shared by all investigators. The fact that bronchiolitis occurs in this form, severity and rapidity only in infants may not be fully explained by the smaller size of the bronchioles in infancy, since they are in terms of ultimate size relatively large.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-344
Author(s):  
J. Routt Reigart

Drs Gellert and Wagner have made some excellent points regarding the need to devise specific, local, lead poisoning prevention programs. Although the Letters to the Editor sections of journals are not the proper forum in which to devise such programs, several general comments should be made. The Committee on Environmental Health carefully drafted its statement on childhood lead poisoning prevention to allow and encourage reasoned and reasonable discussion of screening strategies. The term "universal screening" is intentionally not used in the statement.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-506
Author(s):  
JOHN A. MANGOS

In regard to the "Letter to the Editor" by Dr. George Cassady, we feel that he has misinterpreted the opening paragraph of our article "Familial Juvenile Nephronophthisis" (Pediatrics, 34:337, 1964). We did not suggest that the excellent work of Shafer, Scriver, and Efron supported a cause and effect relationship between the described biochemical defect and the syndrome of hereditary nephritis and deafness. Our statement "recognition and study of this disease has led to the demonstration of a biochemical defect" simply intends to emphasize the importance of recognition of specific clinical syndromes which lead to the study of more cases and frequently to the discovery of important biochemical or other abnormalities in affected individuals.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1960 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-169
Author(s):  
PETER L. HURST

In their letter to the editor Talbot and Richie are attempting to demonstrate two independent equations. The first concerns the relationship between fluid requirements and the two-thirds power of weight. The second concerns the relationship between surface area and the two-thirds power of weight. Whereas, according to their Figure 1, there can be no controversy over the first relationship, controversy over the second relationship continues and is not clarified by the authors. Since their aim to calculate fluid requirements for all ages in a uniform manner is accomplished by expressing it as a function of the two-thirds power of weight, the additional concept of surface area is unnecessary and confusing.


1968 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-327

I note with interest the letter to the editor written by Duane Forsyth in the October 1967 issue of THE MATHEMATICS TEACHER, page 640, concerning a symbol for the inverse of a number.


Tempo ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 58 (228) ◽  
pp. 79-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Doran

I am grateful to Stewart R. Craggs for his kind comments (‘Letters to the Editor’, Tempo 227), and happy to say that I wholeheartedly endorse his other observations – to the extent, in fact, that I hope I may be permitted to amplify one of them.


Author(s):  
Zorica Antić

Letter to the editor is a tool offered to readers most often to react to articles published in a journal. From the standpoint of journals, this genre is very important as it prolongs the process of peer review and maintains the integrity of evidence. These letters have a specific structure often determined by the journals in terms of the number of words, authors, references, figures, and tables. With regard to the style, letters to the editor should be clear, precise and to the point, stating the purpose directly and avoiding unnecessary information. Compared to research articles, letters to the editor rarely use passive constructions and hedging, the most commonly used tense is the present simple and they are often laden with nouns and verbs belonging to the critical style and reflecting strong subjectivity. Although a tool for questioning previously validated research, letters to the editor need to be written in a respectful manner, maintaining the professional level of communication and always having in mind that the purpose is sharing and promotion of knowledge. 


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1960 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-170
Author(s):  
MALCOLM A. HOLLIDAY

A recent letter to the editor by Talbot and Ritchie, again raising certain objections to methods other than surface area as a means of estimating fluid requirements, prompts this reply. The estimation of fluid requirements from any index must be founded on a certain amount of empiricism. The desirable features of a system should include simplicity and yet incorporate means for dealing with exceptions. Ideally it should relate to the factors that actually determine the need. Body weight has long been used as an index successfully, although a sliding scale is required, for direct relation between body weight and water requirement does not exist.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
H. E. THELANDER

The Letter to the Editor by Dr. R. A. Norton in the March issue of Pediatrics must express the sentiments of many pediatricians in private practice. The American Academy of Pediatrics was started by and for the practicing pediatricians. Prior to its organization, the only society was the American Pediatric Society, which for many years limited its membership to 100. The purpose of the Academy was to give all qualified, practicing pediatricians an organization in which they would have an opportunity to exchange ideas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document