A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, duration-finding study of oral terbinafine and open-label, high-dose griseofulvin in children with tinea capitis due to Microsporum species

2002 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 816-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lipozencic ◽  
M. Skerlev ◽  
R. Orofino-Costa ◽  
V.C. Zaitz ◽  
A. Horvath ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 602-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. F. Friedlander ◽  
R. Aly ◽  
B. Krafchik ◽  
J. Blumer ◽  
P. Honig ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (35) ◽  
pp. 4337-4343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Mariani ◽  
Joëlle Blumberg ◽  
Alain Landau ◽  
Daniela Lebrun-Jezekova ◽  
Estelle Botton ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate the somatostatin analog lanreotide as symptomatic treatment for inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis. Patients and Methods In all, 80 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, inoperable malignant digestive obstruction, and two or more vomiting episodes per day or nasogastric tube (NGT) who were previously treated with intravenous corticosteroids and proton pump inhibitors were randomly assigned to one 30-mg injection of lanreotide microparticles (n = 43) or placebo (n = 37) in a 10-day, double-blind, parallel-group phase. The primary end point was the proportion of patients responding on day 7 (one or fewer episodes of vomiting per day or no vomiting recurrence after NGT removal [for ≥ 3 consecutive days in both cases]). Vomiting frequency/NGT secretion volumes, nausea, abdominal pain, well-being, and safety were also assessed. Patients could then enter an open-label lanreotide-only phase. The study was conducted at 22 European hospitals. Results More patients receiving lanreotide than placebo were responders; this difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population on the basis of diary cards (primary analysis; 41.9% [18 of 43] v 29.7% [11 of 37], respectively; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.49; P = .24) but was statistically significant for the corresponding supportive per protocol analysis (57.7% [15 of 26] v 30.4% [seven of 23]; P < .05) and ITT analysis, on the basis of investigators' assessments (50.0% [19 of 38] v 28.6% [10 of 35]; P < .05). Improvements in well-being were significantly greater with lanreotide on days 3, 6, and 7. No significant differences were observed for other secondary end points. Only two (mild/moderate) treatment-emergent adverse events were considered related to lanreotide. Conclusion These results show that lanreotide has some efficacy and is safe in the symptomatic treatment of patients with inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 45-47
Author(s):  
L W Liu ◽  
M Syrzycka ◽  
P Janiszewski ◽  
L Kemps ◽  
B Degeronimo

Abstract Background Diabetic gastroparesis(DG) is a serious, chronic complication of type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus(DM) presenting with a delay in gastric emptying(GE). An estimated 3 million Canadians have been diagnosed with DM; up to 5% of these patients may develop DG. DG can result in poor glycemic control, recurrent nausea and vomiting, often resulting in hospitalization. To date, no effective treatments are available. A phase 2 study showed that relamorelin (RLM), a synthetic ghrelin agonist, was safe and effective in treating DG. Investigators across Canada are participating in a set of phase 3 international trials of RLM in the treatment of DG. Aims To report the Canadian involvement in the international effort to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RLM in the treatment of DG. PLEDGE is a set of 5 trials: two identical 12-week studies, a 46-week extension study, a 52-week exposure study, and an open-label extension study. Collectively, the data from these studies will help to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RLM, a novel treatment for Canadian patients living with DG. Methods Four global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies compare the efficacy of RLM with placebo in participants with DG using composite endpoints of nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, bloating. Participants are randomized to RLM 10μg or placebo subcutaneously (SC) twice daily groups. The open-label continuation of treatment will follow participants until RLM becomes commercially available to provide long-term safety information to support the safe use of RLM as a chronic treatment of DG. As seen in Figure 1, participants from the two 12-week studies will rollover into the third study that will continue for 46 weeks. The fourth study will enroll participants that were not randomized in the first two studies because their symptoms were less severe and will also accept new participants. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to RLM 10μg or placebo SC twice daily groups. Participants from the third and fourth studies have the option to enroll in the open-label study. Results Target enrollment is approx. 1800 participants for the 4 global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies and 1000 participants for the open label study. 700 sites are expected to participate globally; 15 Canadian sites in 6 provinces are participating. Conclusions Canadian centers are actively involved in the PLEDGE trials to help determine the efficacy and safety of RLM, a potential new treatment for DG. This publication increases awareness of the Canadian gastroenterology community, providing an option to refer interested patients to PLEDGE study centers. PLEDGE Studies (NCT03285308, NCT03426345, NCT03420781, NCT03383146, NCT03786380): Placebo-controlled, randomized RLM-MD-01/02/03/04 and open-label study 3071-305-020 to study the safety and efficacy of relamorelin for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis Funding Agencies None


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
giuseppe marazzi ◽  
francesco pelliccia ◽  
maurizio volterrani ◽  
giuseppe campolongo ◽  
salvatore rosanio ◽  
...  

Background: Several trials have shown that in patients (pts) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, reduction of LDL-C level with statin is associated with significant reductions in mortality and cardiovascular events. In clinical practice, however, high dose statin (HDS) treatment is often discontinued by pts due to side effects. Indeed, in statin intolerant pts alternative therapies such as nutraceuticals are available. Purpose: The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and tollerability of low dose statin (LDS) therapy vs the association between a LDS and a nutraceuticals in HDS intollerant pts with CAD deemed to be at high risk. Methods: A randomised, prospective, parallel group, double blind trial was designed. The inclusion criteria were pts with CAD that underwent to PCI and that do not achieved at least a 50% reduction in LDL C and were HDS intolerant in treatment with LDS. These pts were randomized 1:1 in 2 groups: group NS received an association with LDS and a commercially available nutraceutical pill (1 tablet/day containing red yeast rice 200 mg, policosanol 10 mg and berberine 500 mg) and group S continued LDS (10 to 20 mg/day of simvastatin or 5 to 10 mg/day atorvastatin or 5 mg/day rosuvastatin). At baseline and after 3 months all pts underwent to clinical evaluation and blood exams. Results: 100 pts were consecutively enrolled. Baseline clinical features and lipid profiles were similar between groups. At the 3° month, the 2 groups significantly differed for LDL-C, total cholesterol and triglycerides, with lower levels in the NS group than in the S group; also, the 2 groups differed for HDL-C values but not significantly, with higher levels in the NS group than in the S group (Table 1). Morever, in both group the treatment tolerance was high: in each groups only 3 pts discontinued therapy. Conclusion: In pts with CAD and HDS intolerant, a treatment with LDS and Nutraceuticals can be a reliable treatment option. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02001883)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document