The importance of locally derived reference ranges and standardized calculation of dilute Russell's viper venom time results in screening for lupus anticoagulant

2000 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1230-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Gardiner ◽  
I. J. Mackie ◽  
R. G. Malia ◽  
D. W. Jones ◽  
M. Winter ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Moore ◽  
Savita Rangarajan ◽  
Geoffrey F. Savidge

Lupus anticoagulants are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies detected by their effects on phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays. Persistent lupus anticoagulants are associated with thrombotic disease, but not all are clinically significant. Antibody heterogeneity and reagent and test variability dictate that at least 2 tests, of different types, should be used to screen lupus anticoagulants. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay detects clinically significant antibodies. Eighty-two patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 32 with systemic lupus erythematosus + positive for activated seven lupus anticoagulant and who were without thrombosis, who were positive by activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay, were investigated for lupus anticoagulants by dilute Russell's viper venom time, dilute activated partial thromboplastin time, and Taipan snake venom time, and for anticardiolipin antibodies. Fifty-seven of the APS patients were positive for lupus anticoagulants in multiple assays, 25 in activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone. Fourteen of the latter group were previously positive in other antiphospholipid antibodies assays, and 11 had only been positive for lupus anticoagulants by activated seven lupus anticoagulant. Twenty-eight had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies, 6 of whom were from the group that was positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant only. Eight of the systemic lupus erythematosus + lupus anticoagulants (without thrombosis) patients were positive for lupus anticoagulant by activated seven lupus anticoagulant alone and had only been positive in activated seven lupus anticoagulant previously, and none had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. The remaining 24 patients were lupus-anticoagulant positive in multiple assays, and 9 had elevated anticardiolipin antibodies. Dilute Russell's viper venom time and Dilute activated partial thromboplastin time are widely used to detect lupus anticoagulants and are considered to detect clinically significant antibodies. Activated seven lupus anticoagulant detected antibodies in APS patients who were positive by these assays and also lupus anticoagulants undetectable by the dilute Russell's viper venom time/dilute activated partial thromboplastin time reagents used, demonstrating its utility as a first-line or second-line assay.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (01) ◽  
pp. 022-035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Kershaw ◽  
Soma Mohammed ◽  
Giuseppe Lippi ◽  
Emmanuel Favaloro

AbstractThe activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) assay is a very common coagulation test, used for several reasons. The test is conventionally used for assessing the contact factor (intrinsic) pathway of blood coagulation, and thus for screening deficiencies in this pathway, most typically factors VIII, IX, and XI. The APTT is also sensitive to contact factor deficiencies, including factor XII, prekallikrein, and high-molecular-weight kininogen. The APTT may also be elevated in a variety of conditions, including liver disease, vitamin K deficiency, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The APTT can also be used for monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy, as well as for screening lupus anticoagulant (LA) or for assessing thrombosis risk. Which of these separate uses is important to a given laboratory or clinician depends on the laboratory and the clinical context. For example, UFH sensitivity is important in hospital-based laboratories, where UFH therapy is used, but not in hospital-based laboratories where low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is largely employed or where UFH may be assessed by anti-factor Xa testing, or in private/community laboratories not associated with a hospital system. High sensitivity to (low levels of) factors VIII, IX, and XI is generally preferred, as their deficiencies are clinically significant. Also preferred, but not usually achieved, is low sensitivity to factor XII and other contact factors, as these deficiencies are usually asymptomatic. Nevertheless, a good knowledge of factor sensitivity is usually needed, if only to help explain the reasons for a prolonged APTT in a given patient, or whether factor testing or other investigation is required. A good working knowledge of reagents sensitivity to LA is also advisable, especially when the reagent is used as part of a LA test panel, or else as a “general-purpose screening reagent.” The current report is aimed at providing some guidance around these questions, and is intended as a kind of “how to” guide, that will enable laboratories to assess APTT reagents in regard to their sensitivity to heparin, LA, and clotting factors. The report also provides some advice on generation of normal reference ranges, as well as solutions for troubleshooting prolonged APTTs, when performing factor testing or searching for inhibitors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz Tarín-Arzaga ◽  
Carlos de la Cruz-de la Cruz ◽  
Martha A. Reyes-López ◽  
Omar Cantu-Martinez ◽  
Karina Vázquez-Hernández ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolandas Gerbutavicius ◽  
Jawed Fareed ◽  
Harry L. Messmore ◽  
Omer Jqbal ◽  
William H. Wehrmacher ◽  
...  

Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
G W Moore ◽  
M Peyrafitte ◽  
C Dunois ◽  
J Amiral

Background Dilute Russell’s viper venom time (dRVVT) is indispensible in lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection yet commercial reagents from different suppliers perform variably, no gold standard assays exist and therapeutic anticoagulation interference is problematic. Objective The objective of this study was to compare a new formulation dRVVT with two currently available dRVVTs. Materials and methods Life Diagnostics (LD) dRVVT and Stago PTT-LA were routinely used for lupus anticoagulant detection, plus Taipan snake venom time/ecarin time (TSVT/ET) for patients on warfarin or rivaroxaban. Siemens dRVVT and the new HYPHEN BioMed (HBM) dRVVT were tested with 193 patient samples. Group 1, 59 non-anticoagulated patients (NAPs) LA-positive in LD dRVVT; Group 2, 15 PTT-LA-positive/dRVVT-negative NAPs; Group 3, 24 LA-positive warfarinized patients; Group 4, 13 patients on rivaroxaban; Group 5, 62 LA-negative thrombotic NAPs; Group 6, 20 warfarinized, non-antiphospholipid syndrome patients. Results Accepting that the Life Diagnostics reagents were acting as a pseudo-gold standard, Siemens dRVVT detected 56/59, (95%) Group 1 LA and HBM dRVVT 46/59, (76%), one each from Group 2, and Siemens dRVVT detected one in Group 5. The lower HBM dRVVT detection rate mainly concerned weaker LA, where between-reagent concordance is problematic. All Group 3 patients appeared LA-positive in undiluted plasma with Siemens dRVVT, as did 16/24 (67%) with HBM dRVVT but the fewer LA-positives in mixing tests better mapped to clear LA-positives with LD dRVVT. LD and Siemens dRVVTs exhibited 87% and 95% false-positivity for Group 6 whilst HBM dRVVT had none. Increasing the cut-off improved accuracy. Applying higher cut-offs improved accuracy in Group 4 patients. Conclusion HBM dRVVT exhibited improved specificity, mainly due to less interference by anticoagulation, but reduced sensitivity, compared to the other dRVVTs employed.


Lupus ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Galli ◽  
T Barbui

Prothrombin is a common antigenic target of antiphospholipid antibodies, since anti-prothrombin antibodies are detected in about 50-90% of the patients. To allow proper immune recognition, prothrombin must be adsorbed on suitable anionic surfaces. The epitope(s) have not yet been identified: the majority of anti-prothrombin antibodies appear to be of poly- or oligoclonal nature. Anti-prothrombin antibodies, either alone or in combination with anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, are responsible for the lupus anticoagulant activity of about 75% of the cases of phospholipid-dependent inhibitors of coagulation. The two antibodies may be discriminated by means of specific coagulation profiles generated by the comparison of the ratio of the Kaolin Clotting Time (KCT) and the dilute Russell's Viper Venom Time (dRVVT): the KCT profile, which mainly reflects the presence of anti-prothrombin antibodies and the dRVVT profile, which is mostly associated with anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. This distinction, although somewhat artificial, may be clinically useful, since the KCT profile identifies patients at low risk to develop thrombosis. Similarly, most of the studies that measured anti-prothrombin antibodies by ELISA failed to find a significant association with thrombosis. In conclusion, the clinical relevance of these antibodies has not yet been established.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1289-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daimon P. Simmons ◽  
Adrianna Z. Herskovits ◽  
Elisabeth M. Battinelli ◽  
Peter H. Schur ◽  
Susan J. Lemire ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is characterized by laboratory evidence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) [e.g. lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (ACL), and/or antiβ2-glycoprotein I (aB2GPI)] in a clinical setting of thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommends two different testing modalities to detect LA. To evaluate these recommendations in a clinical setting, our hospital, a tertiary care center with a specialized coagulation laboratory, added the dilute Russell’s viper venom time to be performed in parallel with the PTT-lupus anticoagulant to detect LA.Methods:Results of aPL testing were collected on all patients who had LA testing for one year. Chart review was performed to correlate LA results with ACL, aB2GPI, and clinical history.Results:Patients who were initially LA positive by both PTT-lupus anticoagulant and dilute Russell’s viper venom time were more likely to be persistently positive. Patients who were positive for ACL and aB2GPI were likely to be positive by both LA methodologies. No single method was absolutely sensitive, as cases of APS were detected by PTTLA only, DRVVT only, and both methods.Conclusions:The addition of a second testing method for LA provides additional diagnostic information and may be helpful in stratifying risk of thrombosis.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4122-4122
Author(s):  
Celso A. Roprigues ◽  
Aline A. Martinez ◽  
Vania M. Morelli ◽  
Raniely C. Silveira ◽  
Maria Aparecida E. Noguti ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: To rule out the presence of LA antibodies, two or more assays that are sensitive to these antibodies must be negative. The dilute Russell’s Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) and the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) using sensitive reagents have been employed to detect LA. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance level of aPTT using Platelin LS and dRVVT as screening tests to identify LA in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: 94 patients (58 women, 62%) with VTE were evaluated. The detection of circulating inhibitor with Platelin LS and dRVVT was based on a prolonged clotting time and a prolonged 1:1 mixture of sample plasma and normal pooled plasma. The confirmation of the phospholipid dependency was performed only with dRVVT. RESULTS: Among the 94 patients, an abnormal test was found in 24 patients (26%) with aPTT and in 61 patients (65%) using dRVVT. After mixing tests, aPTT ratio remained long in 25% of patients with abnormal aPTT, and in 9.8% with long dRVVT. Five patients had a prolonged mixing study identified by both tests, which resulted in a substantial agreement between the two tests (Kappa= 0.78). Confirmatory tests for LA were positive in 5 out of the 6 patients with long dRVVT mixture, resulting in a prevalence of LA detected by dRVVT of 5.3%. The 5 patients with LA detected by dRVVT also had prolonged mixture with aPTT. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that aPTT with Platelin LS is highly associated with the presence of LA detected by dRVVT and may be suitable as a screening test for LA in patients with VTE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document