Loss of heterozygosity in sporadic parathyroid tumours: involvement of chromosome 1 and the MEN1 gene locus in 11q13.

2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha Dwight ◽  
Stephen Twigg ◽  
Leigh Delbridge ◽  
Fung-Ki Wong ◽  
Filip Farnebo ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 796-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Asteria ◽  
M. Anagni ◽  
L. Persani ◽  
Paolo Beck-Peccoz

2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 443-447
Author(s):  
S. Depasquale ◽  
G. Lambert-Messerlian ◽  
M. R. Quddus ◽  
I. Campbell ◽  
M. Steinhoff ◽  
...  

Inhibin A (α-βA) and activin A (βA-βA) are biochemically similar proteins that generally have opposite biologic functions. For example, while inhibin (α subunit) is proposed to be a tumor suppressor in some types of ovarian cancer, activin appears to stimulate tumor development. Previous reports suggest that a loss of α inhibin subunit expression and elevated serum activin levels are associated with human epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our objective was to examine the α inhibin subunit gene locus on chromosome 2q for evidence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in cases of EOC and to correlate these results with serum activin A levels measured in the same patients. Ovarian tumor and matched healthy tissue samples were collected from 22 women with EOC. DNA was extracted and subjected to PCR analysis using 10 primers, seven from chromosome 2q (α inhibin subunit locus) and, as a control, three from chromosome 7p (inhibin/activin βA subunit). In addition, each patient had a preoperative serum activin A measurement using an ELISA assay. One (1/22) case of EOC demonstrated LOH for one microsatellite marker at the α inhibin gene locus. Thirty-six percent (8/22) of patients had an activin A level that was increased above the normal range.We conclude that loss of heterozygosity at the inhibin/activin α subunit locus is not frequently associated with EOC. More direct molecular analyses of the inhibin and activin genes are warranted to rule out mutations in cases of epithelial ovarian cancer.


2000 ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Miedlich ◽  
K Krohn ◽  
P Lamesch ◽  
A Muller ◽  
R Paschke

OBJECTIVES: Investigation of small numbers of parathyroid tumours by X-chromosome inactivation analysis suggests that the majority of them are monoclonal lesions most likely caused by a somatic mutation. Somatic mutations in the MEN1 gene located on chromosome 11q13 have recently been identified in 12-17% of solitary parathyroid tumours in patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism, and they may be the precipitating genetic defect leading to monoclonal cell proliferation in these tumours. DESIGN: To determine the prevalence of MEN1 gene mutations in monoclonal parathyroid neoplasias we investigated 33 parathyroid tumours of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism for clonality and mutations in the MEN1 gene. METHODS: X-chromosome inactivation analysis was used to assess the clonal status of the tumours, direct sequencing of the complete coding region was applied to identify mutations in the MEN1 gene. RESULTS: Twenty-eight female patients (26 patients with solitary adenoma, 2 patients with hyperplasia) were informative for the polymorphism of the androgen receptor on the X-chromosome and could be tested for inactivation pattern. Nineteen of twenty-six (73%) solitary adenomas were monoclonal. Somatic mutations in the MEN1 gene were identified in nine cases. Six of them were found in the relatively large second exon of the MEN1 gene (A49D, 193del36, 402delC, 482del22, 547delT, W126X). One was found in exon 5 (904del9), one in exon 7 (Y327X) and one in exon 9 (R415X). Of the monoclonal tumours, 5 out of 19 (26%) harboured a somatic MEN1 gene mutation. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, 73% of the solitary parathyroid adenomas were monoclonal. In 26% of the monoclonal tumours a somatic MEN1 gene mutation has been identified. However, for 74% of monoclonal tumours of the parathyroids the underlying genetic defects are still not known.


1994 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gen Tamura ◽  
Chihaya Maesawa ◽  
Yasushi Suzuki ◽  
Masahiro Kashiwaba ◽  
Motoo Ishida ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5105-5105
Author(s):  
Signy Chow ◽  
Jacob M Pendergrast ◽  
Gorka Ochoa-Garay ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Muhammad Ejaz Munir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Spontaneous loss of RHD expression is unusual and may present on routine RHD typing with new “mixed field” (separate positive and negative subpopulation) reactions. Its detection has practical and mechanistic implications for underlying pathology, and such events have been associated with the development or progression of malignant disorders. Case A 49-year-old gentleman with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) underwent standard induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin, achieving a remission. He moved from Saudi Arabia to Canada and presented to our center with an infected central venous catheter, whereupon a repeat marrow was performed, confirming remission (myeloblasts <5%) without peripheral blood count recovery. Review of the original diagnostic bone marrow revealed a predominance of promonocytes and monocytes, raising suspicions of pre-existing chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), while the presence of splenomegaly prompted investigation for a myeloproliferative neoplasm, wherein JAK2 and BCR-ABL testing ultimately proved negative. No cytogenetic abnormalities were noted at diagnosis or post-induction. His presenting transfusion laboratory sample typed as O, RHD-positive with a negative red cell antibody screen, and stable repeat grouping for two months. Platelet transfusion refractoriness developed (PRA 99%), and he qualified for HLA-matched platelets. Six months after dignosis, eleven weeks after last red cell transfusion (pRBC), and 44 days after the last blood bank sample, his AML relapsed and he was then found to have mixed field reactions on RHD grouping, with two distinct populations of O+ and O- cells. Cytogenetic re-analysis of marrow did not demonstrate any abnormalities by G-banding. Methods Relapse versus post-re-induction bone marrow specimens with buccal mucosa serving as the non-hematopoeitic control were assessed by RH genotyping and chromosome 1p microsatellite mapping to deduce the basis for leukemia-associated loss of RHD expression. Results Genotyping analysis of peripheral blood demonstrated the RH genotype ccEe with D (R2r), although the ratio of e/E was out of the usual range for heterozygosity, with e predominant over E. Repeat testing with alternative sequencing primers ruled out unequal amplification of allele-specific polymorphisms at primer sites, while the absence of other out–of-range data for other antigens excluded chimerism. With the mixed field reactions indicating loss of the RHD, this suggested a specific deletion of an entire DcE (R2) allele at a clonal pre-erythroid level. Microsatellite analysis on DNA extracted from non-myeloid tissue (buccal mucosa) compared to DNA extracted from bone marrow sample at relapse demonstrated loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at four of six informative loci, allowing for mapping of a putative chromosomal region of deletion (Figure 2). Conclusions LOH on chromosome 1 has been shown to be an important mechanism of RHD loss.[1] While such loss may be benign, the role of LOH in leukemogenesis has also been demonstrated,[2] as in this case. Alteration in RH expression may be either a surrogate for relapsed malignancy or the effect of an ongoing clonal evolutionary process. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. [1] Kormoczi GF, Dauber EM, Haas OA, Legler TJ, Clausen FB, Fritsch G, Raderer M, Buchta C, Petzer AL, Schonitzer D, Mayr WR, Gassner C. Mosaicism due to myeloid lineage restricted loss of heterozygosity as cause of spontaneous Rh phenotype splitting. Blood 2007;110: 2148-57. [2] Lahortiga I, Vazquez I, Belloni E, Roman JP, Gasparini P, Novo FJ, Zudaire I, Pelicci PG, Hernandez JM, Calasanz MJ, Odero MD. FISH analysis of hematological neoplasias with 1p36 rearrangements allows the definition of a cluster of 2.5 Mb included in the minimal region deleted in 1p36 deletion syndrome. Hum Genet 2005;116: 476-85 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. SWALLOW ◽  
S. GENDLER ◽  
B. GRIFFITHS ◽  
A. KEARNEY ◽  
S. POVEY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 510-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tak-Hong Cheung ◽  
Keith Wing-Kit Lo ◽  
So-Fan Yim ◽  
Cho-sun Poon ◽  
Albert Yu-Kiu Cheung ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gudrun Schleiermacher ◽  
Olivier Delattre ◽  
Martine Peter ◽  
Véronique Mosseri ◽  
Pascale Delonlay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document