Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 553-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J. SHAINI ◽  
A.C.C. SHORTALL ◽  
P.M. MARQUIS
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boniek Borges ◽  
Giovanna de FA da Costa ◽  
Isauremi V de Assunção

ABSTRACT Aim To investigate the longevity of ceramic laminates with minimally invasive preparations. Materials and methods The research was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, using the keywords “dental veneers” or “dental porcelain” or “dental laminates” and survival or survivorship or longevity or “follow-up studies” and Kaplan-Meier. The studies selected for analysis were clinical trials where the ceramic laminates were made with anywhere from no cavity preparation to minimum preparation with a 1 mm maximum depth. Results Of 197 citations identified, five studies were included. Conclusion The survival of the ceramic laminates with minimal preparation is satisfactory, which leads us to conclude that the technique has longevity for 10 years. How to cite this article de FA da Costa G, Borges BCD, de Assunção IV. Clinical Performance of Porcelain Laminate Veneers with Minimal Preparation: A Systematic Review. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2016;5(1):56-59.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 13p
Author(s):  
Hayat Elbanna ◽  
Mohammed Labib Zamzam ◽  
Jylan Fouad El-Guindy ◽  
Ahmed Soliman Idris

Objective: To evaluate fracture resistance and survival rate of IPS Empress CAD versus Polished Celtra Duo ceramic laminate veneers. Material and Methods: Thirty-six ceramic laminate veneers were fabricated for maxillary anterior teeth. The patients were divided into two groups according to the material Group 1(control group) fabricated from IPS Empress CAD laminate veneers and group 2(intervention group) fabricated from Polished Celtra Duo laminate veneers. Standardized the same preparation with butt joint design and chamfer finish line located supra gingival were performed for all the teeth. The fabrication of the veneers was performed using Cad\Cam (Ceramill motion) machine, with software (Exocad). The veneers surfaces were treated and silanated according to the manufacture instruction of each ceramic and enamel surfaces were etched where total etch adhesive protocol was obeyed using BISCO. Follow up sessions were done every two months up to one year for each patient using dental probe and operator vision to evaluate the fracture, survival rate, marginal adaptation, sensitivity and caries. according to USPHS criteria (United States Public Health Service). This was performed by an experienced, blinded investigator. Results: Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, caries and sensitivity were evaluated according to the criteria of USPHS and we found there is no significant difference as both groups scaled zero score. Conclusion: Both IPS Empress Cad and Polished Celtra Duo laminate veneers revealed successful clinical performance in terms of fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, retention, and sensitivity after one year follow up period.   Keywords Ceramic laminate veneers; IPS Empress CAD; Celtra DUO; Clinical performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 36-53
Author(s):  
Yara Sayed Attia ◽  
Rana Mahmoud Sherif ◽  
Hanaa Hassan Zaghloul

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of laminate veneers constructed using a recent polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material following the aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary (APT) technique of tooth preparation in comparison to traditional technique. Six patients received 54 laminate veneers. They were divided into two equal groups (n=27) according to the technique of tooth preparation: group T: traditional technique and group A: aesthetic pre-evaluative temporary technique. VITA ENAMIC material was used for CAD/CAM construction of laminate veneers. Cementation was performed using a light cured resin cement. The laminate veneers were evaluated at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteriea. The data was collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed. Secondary caries, endodontic complications, cracks and loss of retention were not noted in any laminate veneer. Extensive fractures were not detected in both study groups through the study period. There was a statistically significant decrease of color match criteria between the two groups at the 6 and 12 months recalls. Based on this study, both preparation techniques resulted in successful clinical performance. After 12 months, all the veneers in both groups showed no post-operative sensitivity and all patients were highly satisfied regarding their veneers. However, there was a deterioration in color match criteria through the study period in both study groups.


1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 342-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Nordbø ◽  
N. Rygh-Thoresen ◽  
T. Henaug

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 122-127
Author(s):  
Nimet Ünlü ◽  
Nurdan Altınbilek ◽  
Mehmet Semih Velioğlu

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints (FRSs) and adhesive bridges (FRBs) in treating anterior single-tooth defects. Methodology: Sixty-five patients who received FRSs and FRBs from 2001 to 2012 were recalled and evaluated clinically. The FRS and FRB restorations of the patients were clinically evaluated in terms of anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal coloration, secondary caries, and retention, according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The current restoration statuses of the patients from 5 to 10 years post-treatment were photographed and recorded. Patient satisfaction level was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and periodontal pocket depth was measured. Clinical follow-up data were obtained and analyzed with the Chi-squared test (p<0.05). Results: When each of the modified USPHS criteria was compared with the baseline values, statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. There were statistically significant differences when the categories were evaluated according to initial values (p<0.05). When the clinical evaluation criteria were compared with each other, no statistically significant differences were found (p>0.05). While the most successful results were obtained in the FRB group, most of the restoration losses and repairs occurred in the FRS group. According to the data obtained, 38% of restorations were lost and all restorations had been intact for at least 5 years. All lost restorations were in FGS restorations. The recall rate was 49% (n=32). Twenty (62.5%) of 32 patients rated their satisfaction with the restorations as being between 90 and 100, 8 (25%) as being between 80 and 90, and 4 (12.5%) as being between 70 and 80 on the VAS scale. The pocket depths of the patients at 5- and 10-years post-restoration were 2.3–3.8 mm and 2.4–5.2 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Fiber-reinforced restorations performed due to the loss of anterior single teeth and periodontal tissue can serve patients clinically for at least 5 years. FGK and FGS restorations can be considered alternative treatments that can further delay the more expensive implant and prosthetic treatment options for years.   How to cite this article: Ünlü N, Altınbilek N, Velioğlu MS. Retrospective evaluation of fiber-reinforced periodontal splints and resin bridges in the anterior region. Int Dent Res 2021;11(Suppl.1):122-7. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.suppl1.19   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.


2017 ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby

Ceramic inlays, composite inlay-onlays and porcelain or zircon laminate veneers relay to a great extent on the acceptable clinical performance of adhesive luting as it considered the weakest point of the indirect restoration. Although most authors augment the opinion that bonding to enamel is more predictable and has better bond strength than bonding to dentin substrate, but it cannot completely depend on good enamel bond as a process of success of luting adhesive. An additional dentin bond is important not only for improvement the over-all bond strength but also to decrease postoperative hypersensitivities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document