scholarly journals Uncertainty span for relative permeability and capillary pressure by varying wettability and spatial flow directions utilizing pore scale modelling

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. 01002
Author(s):  
Thomas Ramstad ◽  
Anders Kristoffersen ◽  
Einar Ebeltoft
Keyword(s):  
Continental Shelf ◽  
Pore Structure ◽  
Capillary Pressure ◽  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Pore Scale ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Scale Modelling ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves ◽  
Norwegian Continental Shelf

Relative permeability and capillary pressure are key properties within special core analysis and provide crucial information for full field simulation models. These properties are traditionally obtained by multi-phase flow experiments, however pore scale modelling has during the last decade shown to add significant information as well as being less time-consuming to obtain. Pore scale modelling has been performed by using the lattice-Boltzmann method directly on the digital rock models obtained by high resolution micro-CT images on end-trims available when plugs are prepared for traditional SCAL-experiments. These digital rock models map the pore-structure and are used for direct simulations of two-phase flow to relative permeability curves. Various types of wettability conditions are introduced by a wettability map that opens for local variations of wettability on the pore space at the pore level. Focus have been to distribute realistic wettabilities representative for the Norwegian Continental Shelf which is experiencing weakly-wetting conditions and no strong preference neither to water nor oil. Spanning a realistic wettability-map and enabling flow in three directions, a large amount of relative permeability curves is obtained. The resulting relative permeabilities hence estimate the uncertainty of the obtained flow properties on a spatial but specific pore structure with varying, but realistic wettabilities. The obtained relative permeability curves are compared with results obtained by traditional SCAL-analysis on similar core material from the Norwegian Continental Shelf. The results are also compared with the SCAL-model provided for full field simulations for the same field. The results from the pore scale simulations are within the uncertainty span of the SCAL models, mimic the traditional SCAL-experiments and shows that pore scale modelling can provide a time- and cost-effective tool to provide SCAL-models with uncertainties.

Scale Up of Pore-Network Models into Reservoir Scale: Optimization of Inflow Control Devices Placement

SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Farzad Bashtani ◽  
Mazda Irani ◽  
Apostolos Kantzas
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Capillary Pressure ◽  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Pore Network ◽  
Flow In Porous Media ◽  
Well Completion ◽  
Control Devices ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves ◽  
Capillary Pressure Curves

Summary Improvements to more advanced tools, such as inflow control devices (ICDs), create a high drawdown regime close to wellbores. Gas liberation within the formation occurs when the drawdown pressure is reduced below the bubblepoint pressure, which in turn reduces oil mobility by reducing its relative permeability, and potentially reducing oil flow. The key input in any reservoir modeling to compare the competition between gas and liquid flow toward ICDs is the relative permeability of different phases. Pore-network modeling (PNM) has been used to compute the relative permeability curves of oil, gas, and water based on the pore structure of the formation. In this paper, we explain the variability of pore structure on its relative permeability, and for a similar formation and identical permeability, we explain how other factors, such as connectivity and throat radius distribution, can vary the characteristic curves. By using a boundary element method, we also incorporate the expected relative permeability and capillary pressure curves into the modeling. The results show that such variability in the pore network has a less than 10% impact on production gas rates, but its effect on oil production can be significant. Another important finding of such modeling is that providing the PNM-created relative permeabilities may provide totally different direction on setting the operational constraints. For example, in the case studied in this paper, PNM-created relative permeability curves suggest that a reduction of flowing bottomhole pressure (FBHP) increases the oil rate, but for the case modeled with a Corey correlation, changes in FBHP will not create any uplift. The results of such work show the importance of PNM in well completion design and probabilistic analysis of the performance, and can be extended based on different factors of the reservoir in future research. Although PNM has been widely used to study the multiphase flow in porous media in academia, the application of such modeling in reservoir and production engineering is quite narrow. In this study, we develop a framework that shows the general user the importance of PNM simulation and its implementation in day-to-day modeling. With this approach, the PNM can be used not just to provide relative permeability or capillary pressure curves on a core or pore- scale, but to preform simulations at the wellbore or reservoir scale as well to optimize the current completions.

A Machine Learning Methodology for Rock-Typing Using Relative Permeability Curves

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Esteban Alfonso ◽  
Frédérique Fournier ◽  
Victor Alcobia
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Capillary Pressure ◽  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Flow Curves ◽  
Rock Types ◽  
Rock Typing ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves ◽  
Permeability Data

Abstract The determination of the petrophysical rock-types often lacks the inclusion of measured multiphase flow properties as the relative permeability curves. This is either the consequence of a limited number of SCAL relative permeability experiments, or due to the difficulty of linking the relative permeability characteristics to standard rock-types stemming from porosity, permeability and capillary pressure. However, as soon as the number of relative permeability curves is significant, they can be processed under the machine learning methodology stated by this paper. The process leads to an automatic definition of relative permeability based rock-types, from a precise and objective characterization of the curve shapes, which would not be achieved with a manual process. It improves the characterization of petrophysical rock-types, prior to their use in static and dynamic modeling. The machine learning approach analyzes the shapes of curves for their automatic classification. It develops a pattern recognition process combining the use of principal component analysis with a non-supervised clustering scheme. Before this, the set of relative permeability curves are pre-processed (normalization with the integration of irreducible water and residual oil saturations for the SCAL relative permeability samples from an imbibition experiment) and integrated under fractional flow curves. Fractional flow curves proved to be an effective way to unify the relative permeability of the two fluid phases, in a unique curve that characterizes the specific poral efficiency displacement of this rock sample. The methodology has been tested in a real data set from a carbonate reservoir having a significant number of relative permeability curves available for the study, in addition to capillary pressure, porosity and permeability data. The results evidenced the successful grouping of the relative permeability samples, according to their fractional flow curves, which allowed the classification of the rocks from poor to best displacement efficiency. This demonstrates the feasibility of the machine learning process for defining automatically rock-types from relative permeability data. The fractional flow rock-types were compared to rock-types obtained from capillary pressure analysis. The results indicated a lack of correspondence between the two series of rock-types, which testifies the additional information brought by the relative permeability data in a rock-typing study. Our results also expose the importance of having good quality SCAL experiments, with an accurate characterization of the saturation end-points, which are used for the normalization of the curves, and a consistent sampling for both capillary pressure and relative permeability measurements.

Formation Characterization and Production Forecast of Tight Sandstone Formations in Daqing Oilfield Through Digital Rock Technology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danhua Leslie Zhang ◽  
Xiaodong Shi ◽  
Chunyan Qi ◽  
Jianfei Zhan ◽  
Xue Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Capillary Pressure ◽  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Surfactant Solution ◽  
Fluid Models ◽  
Pore Scale ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Digital Rock ◽  
Small Pore ◽  
Sem Imaging

Abstract With the decline of conventional resources, the tight oil reserves in the Daqing oilfield are becoming increasingly important, but measuring relative permeability and determining production forecasts through laboratory core flow tests for tight formations are both difficult and time consuming. Results of laboratory testing are questionable due to the very small pore volume and low permeability of the reservoir rock, and there are challenges in controlling critical parameters during the special core analysis (SCAL) tests. In this paper, the protocol and workflow of a digital rock study for tight sandstones of the Daqing oilfield are discussed. The workflow includes 1) using a combination of various imaging methods to build rock models that are representative of reservoir rocks, 2) constructing digital fluid models of reservoir fluids and injectants, 3) applying laboratory measured wettability index data to define rock-fluid interaction in digital rock models, 4) performing pore-scale modelling to accelerate reservoir characterization and reduce the uncertainty, and 5) performing digital enhanced oil recovery (EOR) tests to analyze potential benefits of different scenarios. The target formations are tight (0.01 to 5 md range) sandstones that have a combination of large grain sizes juxtaposed against small pore openings which makes it challenging to select an appropriate set of imaging tools. To overcome the wide range of pore and grain scales, the imaging tools selected for the study included high resolution microCT imaging on core plugs and mini-plugs sampled from original plugs, overview scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging, mineralogical mapping, and high-resolution SEM imaging on the mini-plugs. High resolution digital rock models were constructed and subsequently upscaled to the plug level to differentiate bedding and other features could be differentiated. Permeability and porosity of digital rock models were benchmarked against laboratory measurements to confirm representativeness. The laboratory measured Amott-Harvey wettability index of restored core plugs was honored and applied to the digital rock models. Digital fluid models were built using the fluid PVT data. A Direct HydroDynamic (DHD) pore-scale flow simulator based on density functional hydrodynamics was used to model multiphase flow in the digital experiments. Capillary pressure, water-oil, surfactant solution-oil, and CO2-oil relative permeability were computed, as well as primary depletion followed with three-cycle CO2 huff-n-puff, and primary depletion followed with three-cycle surfactant solution huff-n-puff processes. Recovery factors were obtained for each method and resulting values were compared to establish most effective field development scenarios. The workflow developed in this paper provides fast and reliable means of obtaining critical data for field development design. Capillary pressure and relative permeability data obtained through digital experiments provide key input parameters for reservoir simulation; production scenario forecasts help evaluate various EOR methods. Digital simulations allow the different scenarios to be run on identical rock samples numerous times, which is not possible in the laboratory.

Use of Transient Data To Calculate Absolute Permeability and Average Fluid Saturations

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Medhat M. Kamal ◽  
Yan Pan
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Reservoir Simulation ◽  
Surface Flow ◽  
Absolute Permeability ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Simulation Studies ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Reservoir Performance ◽  
Transient Data ◽  
Relative Permeability Curves

Summary A new well-testing-analysis method is presented. The method allows for calculating the absolute permeability of the formation in the area influenced by the test and the average saturations in this area. Traditional pressure-transient-analysis methods have been developed and are completely adequate for single-phase flow in the reservoir. The proposed method is not intended for these conditions. The method applies to two-phase flow in the reservoir (oil and water or oil and gas). Future expansion to three-phase flow is possible. Current analysis methods yield only the effective permeability for the dominant flowing phase and the "total mobility" of all phases. The new method uses the surface-flow rates and fluid properties of the flowing phases and the same relative permeability relations used in characterizing the reservoir and predicting its future performance. The method has been verified by comparing the results from analyzing several synthetic tests that were produced by a numerical simulator with the input values. Use of the method with field data is also described. The new method could be applied wherever values of absolute permeability or fluid saturations are used in predicting well and reservoir performance. Probably, the major impact would be in reservoir simulation studies in which the need to transform welltesting permeability to simulator input values is eliminated and additional parameters (fluids saturations) become available to help history match the reservoir performance. This work will also help in predicting well flow rates and in situations in which absolute permeability changes with time (e.g., from compaction). Results showed that the values of absolute permeability in water/oil cases could be reproduced within 3% of the correct values and within 5% of the correct values in gas/oil cases. Errors in calculating the fluid saturations were even lower. One of the main advantages of this method is that the relative permeability curves used in calculating the absolute permeability and average saturations, and later on in numerical reservoir simulation studies, are the same, ensuring a consistent process. The proposed method does not address the question of which set of relative permeability curves should be used. This question should be answered by the engineer performing the reservoir engineering/simulation study. The proposed method mainly is meant to provide consistent results for predicting the reservoir performance using whatever relative permeability relations that are being used in the reservoir simulation model. The method does not induce any additional errors in determining the average saturation or absolute permeability over what may result from using these specific relative permeability curves in the reservoir simulation study. The impact of this study will be to expand the use of information already contained in transient data and surface flow rates of all phases. The results will provide engineers with additional parameters to improve and speed up history matching and the prediction of well and reservoir performances in just about all studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document