scholarly journals Data as a research infrastructure CDS, the Virtual Observatory, astronomy, and beyond

2018 ◽  
Vol 186 ◽  
pp. 01001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise Genova

The situation of data sharing in astronomy is positioned in the current general context of a political push towards, and rapid development of, scientific data sharing. Data is already one of the major infrastructures of astronomy, thanks to the data and service providers and to the International Virtual Observatory Alliance (IVOA). Other disciplines are moving on in the same direction. International organisations, in particular the Research Data Alliance (RDA), are developing building blocks and bridges to enable scientific data sharing across borders. The liaisons between RDA and astronomy, and RDA activities relevant to the librarian community, are discussed.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Smith ◽  
Andrew Hufton

<p>Researchers are increasingly expected by funders and journals to make their data available for reuse as a condition of publication. At Springer Nature, we feel that publishers must support researchers in meeting these additional requirements, and must recognise the distinct opportunities data holds as a research output. Here, we outline some of the varied ways that Springer Nature supports research data sharing and report on key outcomes.</p><p>Our staff and journals are closely involved with community-led efforts, like the Enabling FAIR Data initiative and the COPDESS 2014 Statement of Commitment <sup>1-4</sup>. The Enabling FAIR Data initiative, which was endorsed in January 2019 by <em>Nature</em> and <em>Scientific Data</em>, and by <em>Nature Geoscience</em> in January 2020, establishes a clear expectation that Earth and environmental sciences data should be deposited in FAIR<sup>5</sup> Data-aligned community repositories, when available (and in general purpose repositories otherwise). In support of this endorsement, <em>Nature</em> and <em>Nature Geoscience</em> require authors to share and deposit their Earth and environmental science data, and <em>Scientific Data</em> has committed to progressively updating its list of recommended data repositories to help authors comply with this mandate.</p><p>In addition, we offer a range of research data services, with various levels of support available to researchers in terms of data curation, expert guidance on repositories and linking research data and publications.</p><p>We appreciate that researchers face potentially challenging requirements in terms of the ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘how’ of sharing research data. This can be particularly difficult for researchers to negotiate given that huge diversity of policies across different journals. We have therefore developed a series of standardised data policies, which have now been adopted by more than 1,600 Springer Nature journals. </p><p>We believe that these initiatives make important strides in challenging the current replication crisis and addressing the economic<sup>6</sup> and societal consequences of data unavailability. They also offer an opportunity to drive change in how academic credit is measured, through the recognition of a wider range of research outputs than articles and their citations alone. As signatories of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment<sup>7</sup>, Nature Research is committed to improving the methods of evaluating scholarly research. Research data in this context offers new mechanisms to measure the impact of all research outputs. To this end, Springer Nature supports the publication of peer-reviewed data papers through journals like <em>Scientific Data</em>. Analysis of citation patterns demonstrate that data papers can be well-cited, and offer a viable way for researchers to receive credit for data sharing through traditional citation metrics. Springer Nature is also working hard to improve support for direct data citation. In 2018 a data citation roadmap developed by the Publishers Early Adopters Expert Group was published in <em>Scientific Data</em><sup>8</sup>, outlining practical steps for publishers to work with data citations and associated benefits in transparency and credit for researchers. Using examples from this roadmap, its implementation and supporting services, we outline how a FAIR-led data approach from publishers can help researchers in the Earth and environmental sciences to capitalise on new expectations around data sharing.</p><p>__</p><ol><li>https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00075-3</li> <li>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0506-4</li> <li>https://copdess.org/enabling-fair-data-project/commitment-statement-in-the-earth-space-and-environmental-sciences/</li> <li>https://copdess.org/statement-of-commitment/</li> <li>https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples</li> <li>https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d375368c-1a0a-11e9-8d04-01aa75ed71a1</li> <li>https://sfdora.org/read/</li> <li>https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.259</li> </ol>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Gollwitzer ◽  
Andrea Abele-Brehm ◽  
Christian Fiebach ◽  
Roland Ramthun ◽  
Anne M. Scheel ◽  
...  

Providing access to research data collected as part of scientific publications and publicly funded research projects is now regarded as a central aspect of an open and transparent scientific practice and is increasingly being called for by funding institutions and scientific journals. To this end, researchers should strive to comply with the so-called FAIR principles (of scientific data management), that is, research data should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Systematic data management supports these goals and, at the same time, makes it possible to achieve them efficiently. With these revised recommendations on data management and data sharing, which also draw on feedback from a 2018 survey of its members, the German Psychological Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie; DGPs) specifies important basic principles of data management in psychology. Initially, based on discipline-specific definitions of raw data, primary data, secondary data, and metadata, we provide recommendations on the degree of data processing necessary when publishing data. We then discuss data protection as well as aspects of copyright and data usage before defining the qualitative requirements for trustworthy research data repositories. This is followed by a detailed discussion of pragmatic aspects of data sharing, such as the differences between Type 1 and Type 2 data publications, restrictions on use (embargo period), the definition of "scientific use" by secondary users of shared data, and recommendations on how to resolve potential disputes. Particularly noteworthy is the new recommendation of distinct "access categories" for data, each with different requirements in terms of data protection or research ethics. These range from completely open data without usage restrictions ("access category 0") to data shared under a set of standardized conditions (e.g., reuse restricted to scientific purposes; "access category 1"), individualized usage agreements ("access category 2"), and secure data access under strictly controlled conditions (e.g., in a research data center; “access category 3"). The practical implementation of this important innovation, however, will require data repositories to provide the necessary technical functionalities. In summary, the revised recommendations aim to present pragmatic guidelines for researchers to handle psychological research data in an open and transparent manner, while addressing structural challenges to data sharing solutions that are beneficial for all involved parties.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-25
Author(s):  
Deka Anggawira ◽  
Nina Mayesti

AbstractThis study discusses the sharing of research data through the Repositori Ilmiah Nasional, the Indonesian national scientific repository, which is managed by the Center for Scientific Data and Documentation, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Ilmiah, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, known by the abbreviation PDDI-LIPI). The purpose of this study is to describe the process of research data sharing and identify supporting factors and obstacles faced in that process. This study uses a qualitative approach, with a case study method. Data collection techniques included field observations and observations on the repository system; semi-structured interviews with several informants, including researchers as well as development and librarian teams; and, analysis of policy documents and guidelines. Through these investigations, we discovered that while the Center has developed a new DataVerse repository system to enable research data sharing, there are still several issues that impede the repository from meeting institutional goals for increased data access. There is a need for additional training and socialization of researchers, to encourage and motivate them to share their research data through this service. Additionally, staff members need to gain competence in the management and curation of data. Researchers and librarians involved in research data sharing activities still face various obstacles in the areas of policy, service visibility, and promotion. This research is expected to increase the awareness of researchers, librarians, and repository development teams about each other’s needs and to aid them in collaborating with each other to optimize the sharing of research of data through the repository.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maíra Murrieta Costa ◽  
Murilo Bastos da Cunha

RESUMO Este trabalho discute os conceitos e características da ciência produzida no século XXI. Traz considerações sobre a ciberinfraestrutura necessária à colaboração e compartilhamento de dados de pesquisa. Contextualiza a gestão de dados e os motivos que podem causar impacto no compartilhamento de dados, dentre eles pesquisa em temas de soberania nacional, ou mesmo pesquisas que culminaram como desenvolvimento tecnológico. São apresentados exemplos sobre o processo de compartilhamento de dados em alguns países no exterior. No contexto brasileiro, apresenta e discute o marco legal sobre dados abertos governamentais e científicos. Além disso, apresenta algumas políticas institucionais brasileiras sobre gestão de dados. Ao final do artigo é apresentado um conjunto de diretrizes que pode servir de subsídio para a elaboração de uma política nacional para a gestão de dados de pesquisa.Palavras-chave: Brasil; Gestão de dados de pesquisa; gestão de dados científicos, Informação científica; Política nacional de informação.ABSTRACT This article discusses the concepts and characteristics of science produced in the 21st century. It presents considerations about the necessary cyberinfrastructure for research data collaboration and sharing.  It contextualizes data management and the reasons that may impact data sharing, such as research on national sovereignty issues or research that culminated as technological development. Examples are given about the process of data sharing in some countries abroad. In the Brazilian context, it presents and discusses the legal framework on open governmental and scientific data. In addition, it presents some Brazilian institutional policies on data management. At the end presents a set of guidelines that can subsidy the creation of a national policy for research data management.Keywords: Brazil; National information policy; Research data management; Data scholarship, Scientific information.


2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunqiang ZHU ◽  
Jiulin SUN ◽  
Shunbao LIAO ◽  
Yapeng YANG ◽  
Huazhong ZHU ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunqiang ZHU ◽  
Min FENG ◽  
Jia SONG ◽  
Runda LIU

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document