scholarly journals A necessidade de uma política nacional para a gestão de dados de pesquisa no Brasil | The need for a national policy for the management of research data in Brazil

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maíra Murrieta Costa ◽  
Murilo Bastos da Cunha
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Policy Research ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Research Data ◽  
National Information

RESUMO Este trabalho discute os conceitos e características da ciência produzida no século XXI. Traz considerações sobre a ciberinfraestrutura necessária à colaboração e compartilhamento de dados de pesquisa. Contextualiza a gestão de dados e os motivos que podem causar impacto no compartilhamento de dados, dentre eles pesquisa em temas de soberania nacional, ou mesmo pesquisas que culminaram como desenvolvimento tecnológico. São apresentados exemplos sobre o processo de compartilhamento de dados em alguns países no exterior. No contexto brasileiro, apresenta e discute o marco legal sobre dados abertos governamentais e científicos. Além disso, apresenta algumas políticas institucionais brasileiras sobre gestão de dados. Ao final do artigo é apresentado um conjunto de diretrizes que pode servir de subsídio para a elaboração de uma política nacional para a gestão de dados de pesquisa.Palavras-chave: Brasil; Gestão de dados de pesquisa; gestão de dados científicos, Informação científica; Política nacional de informação.ABSTRACT This article discusses the concepts and characteristics of science produced in the 21st century. It presents considerations about the necessary cyberinfrastructure for research data collaboration and sharing.  It contextualizes data management and the reasons that may impact data sharing, such as research on national sovereignty issues or research that culminated as technological development. Examples are given about the process of data sharing in some countries abroad. In the Brazilian context, it presents and discusses the legal framework on open governmental and scientific data. In addition, it presents some Brazilian institutional policies on data management. At the end presents a set of guidelines that can subsidy the creation of a national policy for research data management.Keywords: Brazil; National information policy; Research data management; Data scholarship, Scientific information.

scholarly journals Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Gollwitzer ◽  
Andrea Abele-Brehm ◽  
Christian Fiebach ◽  
Roland Ramthun ◽  
Anne M. Scheel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Scientific Practice ◽  
Data Access ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Data Repositories

Providing access to research data collected as part of scientific publications and publicly funded research projects is now regarded as a central aspect of an open and transparent scientific practice and is increasingly being called for by funding institutions and scientific journals. To this end, researchers should strive to comply with the so-called FAIR principles (of scientific data management), that is, research data should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Systematic data management supports these goals and, at the same time, makes it possible to achieve them efficiently. With these revised recommendations on data management and data sharing, which also draw on feedback from a 2018 survey of its members, the German Psychological Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie; DGPs) specifies important basic principles of data management in psychology. Initially, based on discipline-specific definitions of raw data, primary data, secondary data, and metadata, we provide recommendations on the degree of data processing necessary when publishing data. We then discuss data protection as well as aspects of copyright and data usage before defining the qualitative requirements for trustworthy research data repositories. This is followed by a detailed discussion of pragmatic aspects of data sharing, such as the differences between Type 1 and Type 2 data publications, restrictions on use (embargo period), the definition of "scientific use" by secondary users of shared data, and recommendations on how to resolve potential disputes. Particularly noteworthy is the new recommendation of distinct "access categories" for data, each with different requirements in terms of data protection or research ethics. These range from completely open data without usage restrictions ("access category 0") to data shared under a set of standardized conditions (e.g., reuse restricted to scientific purposes; "access category 1"), individualized usage agreements ("access category 2"), and secure data access under strictly controlled conditions (e.g., in a research data center; “access category 3"). The practical implementation of this important innovation, however, will require data repositories to provide the necessary technical functionalities. In summary, the revised recommendations aim to present pragmatic guidelines for researchers to handle psychological research data in an open and transparent manner, while addressing structural challenges to data sharing solutions that are beneficial for all involved parties.

scholarly journals An open-source GIS-enabled lookup service for Nagoya Protocol party information

Database ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrikje Seifert ◽  
Marc Weber ◽  
Frank Oliver Glöckner ◽  
Ivaylo Kostadinov
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Genetic Resources ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Benefit Sharing ◽  
Cloud Infrastructure ◽  
Clearing House ◽  
Access And Benefit Sharing ◽  
Nagoya Protocol

Abstract The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing is a transparent legal framework, which governs the access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization. Complying with the Nagoya regulations ensures legal use and re-use of data from genetic resources. Providing detailed provenance information and clear re-usage conditions plays a key role in ensuring the re-usability of research data according to the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and re-usable) Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Even with the framework provided by the ABS (access and benefit sharing) Clearing House and the support of the National Focal Points, establishing a direct link between the research data from genetic resources and the relevant Nagoya information remains a challenge. This is particularly true for re-using publicly available data. The Nagoya Lookup Service was developed for stakeholders in biological sciences with the aim at facilitating the legal and FAIR data management, specifically for data publication and re-use. The service provides up-to-date information on the Nagoya party status for a geolocation provided by GPS coordinates, directing the user to the relevant local authorities for further information. It integrates open data from the ABS Clearing House, Marine Regions, GeoNames and Wikidata. The service is accessible through a REST API and a user-friendly web form. Stakeholders include data librarians, data brokers, scientists and data archivists who may use this service before, during and after data acquisition or publication to check whether legal documents need to be prepared, considered or verified. The service allows researchers to estimate whether genetic data they plan to produce or re-use might fall under Nagoya regulations or not, within the limits of the technology and without constituting legal advice. It is implemented using portable Docker containers and can easily be deployed locally or on a cloud infrastructure. The source code for building the service is available under an open-source license on GitHub, with a functional image on Docker Hub and can be used by anyone free of charge.

Towards a Specialized Environmental Data Portal: Challenges and Opportunities

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ionut Iosifescu-Enescu ◽  
Gian-Kasper Plattner ◽  
Dominik Haas-Artho ◽  
David Hanimann ◽  
Konrad Steffen
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Central Element ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Environmental Data ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Environmental Domain ◽  
Federal Institute ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Data Portal

<p>EnviDat – www.envidat.ch – is the institutional Environmental Data portal of the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL. Launched in 2012 as a small project to explore possible solutions for a generic WSL-wide data portal, it has since evolved into a strategic initiative at the institutional level tackling issues in the broad areas of Open Research Data and Research Data Management. EnviDat demonstrates our commitment to accessible research data in order to advance environmental science.</p><p>EnviDat actively implements the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability) principles. Core EnviDat research data management services include the registration, integration and hosting of quality-controlled, publication-ready data from a wide range of terrestrial environmental systems, in order to provide unified access to WSL’s environmental monitoring and research data. The registration of research data in EnviDat results in the formal publication with permanent identifiers (EnviDat own PIDs as well as DOIs) and the assignment of appropriate citation information.</p><p>Innovative EnviDat features that contribute to the global system of modern documentation and exchange of scientific information include: (i) a DataCRediT mechanism designed for specifying data authorship (Collection, Validation, Curation, Software, Publication, Supervision), (ii) the ability to enhance published research data with additional resources, such as model codes and software, (iii) in-depth documentation of data provenance, e.g., through a dataset description as well as related publications and datasets, (iv) unambiguous and persistent identifiers for authors (ORCIDs) and, in the medium-term, (v) a decentralized “peer-review” data publication process for safeguarding the quality of available datasets in EnviDat.</p><p>More recently, the EnviDat development has been moving beyond the set of core features expected from a research data management portal with a built-in publishing repository. This evolution is driven by the diverse set of researchers’ requirements for a specialized environmental data portal that formally cuts across the five WSL research themes forest, landscape, biodiversity, natural hazards, and snow and ice, and that concerns all research units and central IT services.</p><p>Examples of such recent requirements for EnviDat include: (i) immediate access to data collected by automatic measurements stations, (ii) metadata and data visualization on charts and maps, with geoservices for large geodatasets, and (iii) progress towards linked open data (LOD) with curated vocabularies and semantics for the environmental domain.</p><p>There are many challenges associated with the developments mentioned above. However, they also represent opportunities for further improving the exchange of scientific information in the environmental domain. Especially geospatial technologies have the potential to become a central element for any specialized environmental data portal, triggering the convergence between publishing repositories and geoportals. Ultimately, these new requirements demonstrate the raised expectations that institutions and researchers have towards the future capabilities of research data portals and repositories in the environmental domain. With EnviDat, we are ready to take up these challenges over the years to come.</p>

scholarly journals Perceptions and Attitudes toward Data Sharing among Dental Researchers

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Spallek ◽  
S.M. Weinberg ◽  
M. Manz ◽  
S. Nanayakkara ◽  
X. Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
International Association ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
Use Of Data ◽  
Share Data ◽  
Past Experiences

Introduction: Increasing attention is being given to the roles of data management and data sharing in the advancement of research. This study was undertaken to explore opinions and past experiences of established dental researchers as related to data sharing and data management. Methods: Researchers were recruited from the International Association for Dental Research scientific groups to complete a survey consisting of Likert-type, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions. Results: All 42 respondents indicated that data sharing should be promoted and facilitated, but many indicated reservations or concerns about the proper use of data and the protection of research subjects. Many had used data from data repositories and received requests for data originating from their studies. Opinions varied regarding restrictions such as requirements to share data and the time limits of investigator rights to keep data. Respondents also varied in their methods of data management and storage, with younger respondents and those with higher direct costs of their research tending to use dedicated experts to manage their data. Discussion: The expressed respondent support for research data sharing, with the noted concerns, complements the idea of developing managed data clearinghouses capable of promoting, managing, and overseeing the data-sharing process. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Researchers can use the results of this study to evaluate and improve management and sharing of research data. By encouraging and facilitating the data-sharing process, research can advance more efficiently, and research findings can be implemented into practice more rapidly to improve patient care and the overall oral health of populations.

scholarly journals Research Data Management - Current status and future challenges for German non-university research institutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mareike Petersen ◽  
Bianca Pramann ◽  
Ralf Toepfer ◽  
Janna Neumann ◽  
Harry Enke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Research Data ◽  
University Research ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
World Cafe ◽  
Future Challenges ◽  
Scientific Fields

This report describes the results of a workshop on research data management (RDM) that took place in June 2019. More than 50 experts from 46 different non-university institutes covering all Leibniz Sections participated. The aim of the workshop was the intra- and transdisciplinary exchange among RDM experts of different institutions and sections within the Leibniz Association on current questions and challenges but also on experiences and activities with respect to RDM. The event was structured in inspiring talks, a World Café to discuss ideas and solutions related to RDM and an exchange of experts following their affiliation to the different Leibniz sections. The workshop revealed that most institutions, independent of scientific fields, face similar overarching problems with respect to RDM, e.g. missing incentives and no awareness of the benefits that would arise from a proper RDM and data sharing. The event also endorsed that the Research Data Working Group of the Leibniz Association (AK Forschungsdaten) is a place for the exchange of all topics around RDM and enables discussions on how to refine RDM at all institutions and in all scientific fields.

scholarly journals A gestão dos dados de pesquisa no âmbito da comunidade dos pesquisadores vinculados aos programas de pós-graduação brasileiros na área da Ciência da Informação: desvendando as práticas e percepções associadas ao uso e reuso de dados | The management of research data within the community of researchers linked to Brazilian post-graduate programs in the area of Information Science: unveiling the practices and perceptions associated with the use and reuse of data

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Ataíde Dias ◽  
Renata Lemos Dos Anjos ◽  
Débora Gomes De Araújo
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Graduate Programs ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Formal Control ◽  
Community Of Researchers ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Science Information

RESUMO A pesquisa investigou as práticas e percepções associadas com a gestão de dados pelos pesquisadores na pós-graduação brasileira na área da Ciência da Informação (CI). O instrumento de pesquisa utilizado foi um questionário semiestruturado, enviado por e-mail para 341 pesquisadores vinculados aos programas de pós-graduação brasileiros em CI. Os dados obtidos foram analisados através de técnicas de estatística descritiva e análise temática. Verificou-se que as práticas de gestão de dados conduzidas pelos pesquisadores precisam ser aprimoradas e que eles possuem postura favorável com relação ao compartilhamento de dados, desde que exista algum controle formal sobre os mesmos.Palavras-chave: Dados de Pesquisa; Compartilhamento de Dados de Pesquisa; Ciência da Informação; Tecnologia da Informação.ABSTRACT The research investigated the practices and perceptions associated with data management by researchers in Brazilian postgraduate programs in the Information Science (IC) area. A semi-structured survey was used as the research instrument, it was sent by e-mail to 341 researchers linked to the Brazilian postgraduate programs in CI. The data was analyzed through descriptive statistics techniques and thematic analysis. It was found that the data management practices conducted by the researchers need to be improved and that they have a favorable approach regarding data sharing, provided there is some formal control over them.Keywords: Research Data; Research Data Sharing; Information Science; Information Technology.

scholarly journals A collective challenge: Open Science from the perspective of Science Europe

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 424-430
Author(s):  
Marie Timmermann
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Major Research ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
Management Policies ◽  
Good Research ◽  
Quality Of Research

Open Science aims to enhance the quality of research by making research and its outputs openly available, reproducible and accessible. Science Europe, the association of major Research Funding Organisations and Research Performing Organisations, advocates data sharing as one of the core aspects of Open Science and promotes a more harmonised approach to data sharing policies. Good research data management is a prerequisite for Open Science and data management policies should be aligned as much as possible, while taking into account discipline-specific differences. Research data management is a broad and complex field with many actors involved. It needs collective efforts by all actors to work towards aligned policies that foster Open Science.

scholarly journals The History, Advocacy and Efficacy of Data Management Plans

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Smale ◽  
Kathryn Unsworth ◽  
Gareth Denyer ◽  
Daniel Barr
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Research Management ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Multiple Use ◽  
Funding Body ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Recent Developments

AbstractData management plans (DMPs) have increasingly been encouraged as a key component of institutional and funding body policy. Although DMPs necessarily place administrative burden on researchers, proponents claim that DMPs have myriad benefits, including enhanced research data quality, increased rates of data sharing, and institutional planning and compliance benefits.In this manuscript, we explore the international history of DMPs and describe institutional and funding body DMP policy. We find that economic and societal benefits from presumed increased rates of data sharing was the original driver of mandating DMPs by funding bodies. Today, 86% of UK Research Councils and 63% of US funding bodies require submission of a DMP with funding applications. Given that no major Australian funding bodies require DMP submission, it is of note that 37% of Australian universities have taken the initiative to internally mandate DMPs.Institutions both within Australia and internationally frequently promote the professional benefits of DMP use, and endorse DMPs as ‘best practice’. We analyse one such typical DMP implementation at a major Australian institution, finding that DMPs have low levels of apparent translational value. Indeed, an extensive literature review suggests there is very limited published systematic evidence that DMP use has any tangible benefit for researchers, institutions or funding bodies.We are therefore led to question why DMPs have become the go-to tool for research data professionals and advocates of good data practice. By delineating multiple use-cases and highlighting the need for DMPs to be fit for intended purpose, we question the view that a good DMP is necessarily that which encompasses the entire data lifecycle of a project. Finally, we summarise recent developments in the DMP landscape, and note a positive shift towards evidence-based research management through more researcher-centric, educative, and integrated DMP services.

scholarly journals Archaeological Analysis in the Information Age: Guidelines for Maximizing the Reach, Comprehensiveness, and Longevity of Data

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah W. Kansa ◽  
Levent Atici ◽  
Eric C. Kansa ◽  
Richard H. Meadow
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Information Age ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Reproducible Research ◽  
Research Data Management ◽  
The Past ◽  
Archaeological Analysis ◽  
The Web

ABSTRACTWith the advent of the Web, increased emphasis on “research data management,” and innovations in reproducible research practices, scholars have more incentives and opportunities to document and disseminate their primary data. This article seeks to guide archaeologists in data sharing by highlighting recurring challenges in reusing archived data gleaned from observations on workflows and reanalysis efforts involving datasets published over the past 15 years by Open Context. Based on our findings, we propose specific guidelines to improve data management, documentation, and publishing practices so that primary data can be more efficiently discovered, understood, aggregated, and synthesized by wider research communities.

Beyond article publishing - support and opportunities for researchers in FAIR data sharing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Smith ◽  
Andrew Hufton
Keyword(s):  
Data Sharing ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Research Assessment ◽  
Environmental Sciences ◽  
Data Repositories ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
The Impact

<p>Researchers are increasingly expected by funders and journals to make their data available for reuse as a condition of publication. At Springer Nature, we feel that publishers must support researchers in meeting these additional requirements, and must recognise the distinct opportunities data holds as a research output. Here, we outline some of the varied ways that Springer Nature supports research data sharing and report on key outcomes.</p><p>Our staff and journals are closely involved with community-led efforts, like the Enabling FAIR Data initiative and the COPDESS 2014 Statement of Commitment <sup>1-4</sup>. The Enabling FAIR Data initiative, which was endorsed in January 2019 by <em>Nature</em> and <em>Scientific Data</em>, and by <em>Nature Geoscience</em> in January 2020, establishes a clear expectation that Earth and environmental sciences data should be deposited in FAIR<sup>5</sup> Data-aligned community repositories, when available (and in general purpose repositories otherwise). In support of this endorsement, <em>Nature</em> and <em>Nature Geoscience</em> require authors to share and deposit their Earth and environmental science data, and <em>Scientific Data</em> has committed to progressively updating its list of recommended data repositories to help authors comply with this mandate.</p><p>In addition, we offer a range of research data services, with various levels of support available to researchers in terms of data curation, expert guidance on repositories and linking research data and publications.</p><p>We appreciate that researchers face potentially challenging requirements in terms of the ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘how’ of sharing research data. This can be particularly difficult for researchers to negotiate given that huge diversity of policies across different journals. We have therefore developed a series of standardised data policies, which have now been adopted by more than 1,600 Springer Nature journals. </p><p>We believe that these initiatives make important strides in challenging the current replication crisis and addressing the economic<sup>6</sup> and societal consequences of data unavailability. They also offer an opportunity to drive change in how academic credit is measured, through the recognition of a wider range of research outputs than articles and their citations alone. As signatories of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment<sup>7</sup>, Nature Research is committed to improving the methods of evaluating scholarly research. Research data in this context offers new mechanisms to measure the impact of all research outputs. To this end, Springer Nature supports the publication of peer-reviewed data papers through journals like <em>Scientific Data</em>. Analysis of citation patterns demonstrate that data papers can be well-cited, and offer a viable way for researchers to receive credit for data sharing through traditional citation metrics. Springer Nature is also working hard to improve support for direct data citation. In 2018 a data citation roadmap developed by the Publishers Early Adopters Expert Group was published in <em>Scientific Data</em><sup>8</sup>, outlining practical steps for publishers to work with data citations and associated benefits in transparency and credit for researchers. Using examples from this roadmap, its implementation and supporting services, we outline how a FAIR-led data approach from publishers can help researchers in the Earth and environmental sciences to capitalise on new expectations around data sharing.</p><p>__</p><ol><li>https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00075-3</li> <li>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0506-4</li> <li>https://copdess.org/enabling-fair-data-project/commitment-statement-in-the-earth-space-and-environmental-sciences/</li> <li>https://copdess.org/statement-of-commitment/</li> <li>https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples</li> <li>https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d375368c-1a0a-11e9-8d04-01aa75ed71a1</li> <li>https://sfdora.org/read/</li> <li>https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.259</li> </ol>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document