scholarly journals Research on GPR image recognition based on deep learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 309 ◽  
pp. 03027
Author(s):  
Zhimin Gong ◽  
Huaiqing Zhang

It is difficult for traditional image recognition methods to accurately identify ground penetrating radar (GPR) images. This paper proposes a deep-learning based Faster R-CNN algorithm for the automatic classification and recognition of GPR images. Firstly, GPR images with different features were obtained by using gprMax, a professional GPR simulation software. Then, the feature of the target in the image was taken as the recognition object and the data set was made. Finally, Faster R-CNN’s recognition ability of GPR images was analyzed from various accuracy, average accuracy and other indicators. The results showed that Faster R-CNN could successfully identify GPR images and accurately classify them, with an average accuracy rate of 93.9%.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Jian ◽  
Xiaoyang Dong ◽  
Liang Jian

Abstract Based on deep learning, this study combined sparse autoencoder (SAE) with extreme learning machine (ELM) to design an SAE-ELM method to reduce the dimension of data features and realize the classification of different types of data. Experiments were carried out on NSL-KDD and UNSW-NB2015 data sets. The results showed that, compared with the K-means algorithm and the SVM algorithm, the proposed method had higher performance. On the NSL-KDD data set, the average accuracy rate of the SAE-ELM method was 98.93%, the false alarm rate was 0.17%, and the missing report rate was 5.36%. On the UNSW-NB2015 data set, the accuracy rate of the SAE-ELM method was 98.88%, the false alarm rate was 0.12%, and the missing report rate was 4.31%. The results show that the SAE-ELM method is effective in the detection and recognition of abnormal data and can be popularized and applied.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Jie ◽  
Song Fubin ◽  
Zhang Pengli ◽  
Wang Jiaming ◽  
Cui Chao

Author(s):  
Siyu Chen ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Zheng Fang ◽  
Zhensheng Shi ◽  
Anxue Zhang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Aolin Che ◽  
Yalin Liu ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Ke Zhang ◽  
...  

In the past decades, due to the low design cost and easy maintenance, text-based CAPTCHAs have been extensively used in constructing security mechanisms for user authentications. With the recent advances in machine/deep learning in recognizing CAPTCHA images, growing attack methods are presented to break text-based CAPTCHAs. These machine learning/deep learning-based attacks often rely on training models on massive volumes of training data. The poorly constructed CAPTCHA data also leads to low accuracy of attacks. To investigate this issue, we propose a simple, generic, and effective preprocessing approach to filter and enhance the original CAPTCHA data set so as to improve the accuracy of the previous attack methods. In particular, the proposed preprocessing approach consists of a data selector and a data augmentor. The data selector can automatically filter out a training data set with training significance. Meanwhile, the data augmentor uses four different image noises to generate different CAPTCHA images. The well-constructed CAPTCHA data set can better train deep learning models to further improve the accuracy rate. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the accuracy rates of five commonly used attack methods after combining our preprocessing approach are 2.62% to 8.31% higher than those without preprocessing approach. Moreover, we also discuss potential research directions for future work.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 405
Author(s):  
Xuan Feng ◽  
Haoqiu Zhou ◽  
Cai Liu ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Wenjing Liang ◽  
...  

The subsurface target classification of ground penetrating radar (GPR) is a popular topic in the field of geophysics. Among the existing classification methods, geometrical features and polarimetric attributes of targets are primarily used. As polarimetric attributes contain more information of targets, polarimetric decomposition methods, such as H-Alpha decomposition, have been developed for target classification of GPR in recent years. However, the classification template used in H-Alpha classification is preset depending on the experience of synthetic aperture radar (SAR); therefore, it may not be suitable for GPR. Moreover, many existing classification methods require excessive human operation, particularly when outliers exist in the sample (the data set containing the features of targets); therefore, they are not efficient or intelligent. We herein propose a new machine learning method based on sample centers, i.e., particle center supported plane (PCSP). The sample center is defined as the point with the smallest sum of distances from all points in the same sample, which is considered as a better representation of the sample without significant effect of the outliers. In this proposed method, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is performed to obtain the sample centers; the new criterion for subsurface target classification is achieved. We applied this algorithm to full polarimetric GPR data measured in the laboratory and outdoors. The results indicate that, comparing with support vector machine (SVM) and classical H-Alpha classification, this new method is more efficient and the accuracy is relatively high.


Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. WA119-WA129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Rutishauser ◽  
Hansruedi Maurer ◽  
Andreas Bauder

On the basis of a large data set, comprising approximately 1200 km of profile lines acquired with different helicopter-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) systems over temperate glaciers in the western Swiss Alps, we have analyzed the possibilities and limitations of using helicopter-borne GPR surveying to map the ice-bedrock interface. We have considered data from three different acquisition systems including (1) a low-frequency pulsed system hanging below the helicopter (BGR), (2) a stepped frequency system hanging below the helicopter (Radar Systemtechnik GmbH [RST]), and (3) a commercial system mounted directly on the helicopter skids (Geophysical Survey Systems Incorporated [GSSI]). The systems showed considerable differences in their performance. The best results were achieved with the BGR system. On average, the RST and GSSI systems yielded comparable results, but we observed significant site-specific differences. A comparison with ground-based GPR data found that the quality of helicopter-borne data is inferior, but the compelling advantages of airborne surveying still make helicopter-borne data acquisition an attractive option. Statistical analyses concerning the bedrock detectability revealed not only large differences between the different acquisition systems but also between different regions within our investigation area. The percentage of bedrock reflections identified (with respect to the overall profile length within a particular region) varied from 11.7% to 68.9%. Obvious factors for missing the bedrock reflections included large bedrock depths and steeply dipping bedrock interfaces, but we also observed that internal features within the ice body may obscure bedrock reflections. In particular, we identified a conspicuous “internal reflection band” in many profiles acquired with the GSSI system. We attribute this feature to abrupt changes of the water content within the ice, but more research is required for a better understanding of the nature of this internal reflection band.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document