scholarly journals Nutrition and health claims in Europe: oils & fats related claims, regulatory and labeling challenges

OCL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Bucchini
Keyword(s):  
Fatty Acids ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Health Claims ◽  
The Novel ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Omega 3 ◽  
Nutrition And Health ◽  
Novel Food ◽  
Nutrition And Health Claims ◽  
The Eu

In the European Union, fats and oils in foods are regulated by laws mainly set at the Union level. EU rules on nutrition and health claims are particularly relevant for some fatty acids. Contrary to structure-function claims in the US, in the EU, such claims have to be authorized before use; in the case of omega-3, along with a nutrition claim, a remarkable number of health claims have been authorised based on the essentiality of such fatty acids. Claims related to environmental, social or ethical concerns are not regulated in detail at the EU level. While claims are voluntary information, mandatory rules on labelling also apply to fatty acids, and sometimes create challenges for food businesses. Another piece of legislation, the novel food regulation, is important for new sources of oils and fats. Its scope includes determining the novel food status of foods, and, if required, submitting an application in order to obtain authorisation. Several sources of fatty acids have been authorized as novel foods. Benefits of a novel food application include legal certainty and protection of data, while costs and particularly the length of the process are the main barriers. An assessment of novel food status should also concern new technologies, such as new delivery mechanisms. While several provisions of EU law concern oils and fats, a 2019 regulation not only imposes a 2 g limit (per 100 g of fat) for trans fats not naturally occurring in animal fats, but also creates an obligation to transfer information in the supply chain.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Credibility of Nutrition and Health Claims: Policy Implications from a Case Study of Mongolian Food Labels

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (20) ◽  
pp. 7456
Author(s):  
Nyamragchaa Chimedtseren ◽  
Bridget Kelly ◽  
Anne-Therese McMahon ◽  
Heather Yeatman
Keyword(s):  
Claim Data ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Health Claims ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Nutrition And Health ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nutrition Claims ◽  
Nutrition And Health Claims ◽  
The Eu

Nutrition and health claims should be truthful and not misleading. We aimed to determine the use of nutrition and health claims in packaged foods sold in Mongolia and examine their credibility. A cross-sectional study examined the label information of 1723 products sold in marketplaces in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. The claim data were analysed descriptively. In the absence of national regulations, the credibility of the nutrition claims was examined by using the Codex Alimentarius guidelines, while the credibility of the health claims was assessed by using the European Union (EU) Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006. Nutritional quality of products bearing claims was determined by nutrient profiling. Approximately 10% (n = 175) of products carried at least one health claim and 9% (n = 149) carried nutrition claims. The credibility of nutrition and health claims was very low. One-third of nutrition claims (33.7%, n = 97) were deemed credible, by having complete and accurate information on the content of the claimed nutrient/s. Only a few claims would be permitted in the EU countries by complying with the EU regulations. Approximately half of the products with nutrition claims and 40% of products with health claims were classified as less healthy products. The majority of nutrition and health claims on food products sold in Mongolia were judged as non-credible, and many of these claims were on unhealthy products. Rigorous and clear regulations are needed to prevent negative impacts of claims on food choices and consumption, and nutrition transition in Mongolia.

scholarly journals Fifteen Years of Regulating Nutrition and Health Claims in Europe: The Past, the Present and the Future

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1725
Author(s):  
Alie de Boer
Keyword(s):  
Health Claims ◽  
Nutrition And Health ◽  
Playing Field ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
The Future ◽  
Scientific Substantiation ◽  
Nutrient Profiles ◽  
Infants And Young Children ◽  
Nutrition And Health Claims ◽  
The Eu

Suggestions that a food contains healthy ingredients or that it can provide beneficial effects upon consumption have been regulated in the EU since 2006. This paper describes the analysis of how this nutrition and health claim regulation has resulted in over 300 authorised claims and how the authorisation requirements and processes have affected the use of claims on foods. Five challenges are identified that negatively affect the current legislation dealing with nutrition and health claims: non-reviewed botanical claims (as well as on hold claims for infants and young children), the lack of nutrient profiles and the focus of claims on single ingredients, consumer understanding, research into health effects of nutrition and finally, enforcement. These challenges are shown to influence the goals of the regulation: protecting consumers from false and misleading claims and stimulating the development of a level playing field in the EU, to foster innovation. Tackling these political and scientific substantiation questions for health claims, together with continuously analysing the understanding and usage of claims by consumers and operators will ensure that the NHCR will stay effective, today and in the future.

scholarly journals Session 4: Challenges facing the food industry in innovating for health Regulatory challenges and opportunities for food innovation

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nino Binns
Keyword(s):  
Health Claims ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Nutrition And Health ◽  
Challenges And Opportunities ◽  
Food Legislation ◽  
Nutrient Profiles ◽  
Initial List ◽  
Nutrition And Health Claims ◽  
The Eu

The primary role of the extensive and complex modern food legislation is to protect the consumer. Providing a framework for industry and enabling free trade are secondary aims. In the EU the 2006 Regulation on nutrition and health claims made on foods was adopted in December 2006. This Regulation defines detailed lists of permitted claims with precise conditions, requires foods making claims to meet specific nutrient profiles and requires the submission of a dossier for approval of new health claims. Nutrient profiles and an initial list of existing health claims will not be agreed until January 2009 and January 2010 respectively. The uncertainty about profiles and the initial list of claims as well as the prescriptive nature of the Regulation will have a major impact, some negative but some positive, on food innovation. Worldwide legislation on nutrition and health claims continues to develop. The current paper also provides an outline of some other key pieces of European legislation that affect food innovation. However, currently, all this legislation remains in development and up-to-date information can be sought from the reference material provided.

scholarly journals Scientific substantiation of health claims in the EU

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Flynn
Keyword(s):  
Health Claims ◽  
Nutrition And Health ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
New Directions ◽  
Scientific Substantiation ◽  
Specific Health ◽  
Nutrition And Health Claims ◽  
The Eu

EU legislation on nutrition and health claims made on foods (Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006) specifies that health claims should be only authorised for use in the Community after a scientific assessment of the highest possible standard is carried out by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). This paper focuses on the scientific substantiation of health claims within the context of the EU Regulation. The evaluation of the substantiation of health claims is carried out by the EFSA Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). The EFSA has published extensive guidance to assist applicants in the preparation of applications for authorisations of health claims. This guidance summarises the general principles applied by the NDA Panel in the evaluation of health claims, including the scientific criteria for substantiation, as well as the scientific requirements for the substantiation of specific health claims. To date, the EFSA NDA Panel has concluded that a wide range of health claims has been substantiated. These include claims for many well-established functions of nutrients, as well as beneficial effects of foods and food constituents on a range of body functions. In addition, claims have been substantiated on the role of nutrients in growth and development of children and on the effects of nutrients and food constituents on reduction of risk factors for disease. EFSA evaluations and guidance have made an important contribution to the understanding of the scientific substantiation of health claims which will help to set new directions for research and will guide future innovation.

scholarly journals European Health Claims for Small and Medium-Sized Companies – Utopian Dream or Future Reality?

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Brandenburger ◽  
Marc Birringer
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Health Claims ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Nutrition And Health ◽  
European Health ◽  
Food And Drink ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Nutrition And Health Claims

Background: In December 2007, the European Regulation (EC) 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims came into force. The European Union wanted to regulate the use of health claims on products. An online survey was carried out to evaluate the situation, particularly of small and medium-sized companies, dealing with the new regulation.Methods: The online survey on health claims was conducted with 16 enterprises. To underline the findings a SWOT (Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis was made of the nutrition and health claims regulation regarding small and medium-sized companies in the European food and drink market.Results: The findings of this study indicated that the European Union did a step in the right direction. Most companies defined the decent competition, the simplified trade within the inner-European market, and the consumer protection as positive aspects. The biggest threat is seen in false investment conditioned by the limited research and development budgets, especially of small and medium-sized enterprises, and the cost intensive scientific evaluation to reach an authorized health claim.Conclusions: Overall, there are several strengths and opportunities speaking for SMEs and health claims in the near future. The most promising ones are the publishing of the new European Union Register of Nutrition and Health Claims and the learning effects that will occur. The biggest threat is, and will remain to be, false investment and the possible loss of a lot of money. Nevertheless, health claims for small and medium-sized enterprises will inevitably be the future to keep the European food and drink market competitive.Keywords: health claims, European Legislation, SME

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document